Wednesday, April 30, 2008

A Look Inside the IAF

Bob Simon of 60 Minutes examines the Israeli Air Force. As one officer says, if Israel loses just one war it will cease to exist. A mostly positive profile except the part where Simon makes an idiotic remark to a pilot saying that he doesn't look like a killer and then briefly touches on civilians who have inadvertently been killed by the IAF. The segment also discusses the IAF's role in the six day war and the bombing of Iraq's Osirak nuclear reactor and whether Israel intends to take out Iran's nukes and the complications involved if they should make that decision.

Obama's Communist Friends

Hussein Obama has run a deceptive campaign masquerading as a moderate all the while surrounding himself with black nationalists, islamists, communists and terrorists. Though recently his veneer has started to wear off. He has been praised by Nicaragua's Daniel Ortega who says his presidential bid is "laying the foundations for a revolutionary change." Documents captured from the Columbian terrorist group FARC showed that it has been in touch with people connected to the Obama campaign. Hussein Obama has been endorsed by hamas, and Gazans were making computer generated phone calls to Americans urging them to vote for Hussein Obama. And of course there's his association with Wright, the weather underground terrorists Ayers and Dohrn, rashid khalidi who believes the founding of Israel was a catastrophe and other assorted anti-American, anti-Israel radicals, including his foreign policy advisors. It is simply impossible to believe that someone who consistently surrounds himself with radicals, does not share these views, yet his supporters insist it is playing dirty politics to even mention the people with who he associates with, let alone suggest he shares their radicalism and hatred of America.

American Thinker reveals a couple of other Marxist friends of Obama. Frank Marshall Davis, a dear friend and mentor of Obama, was a member of the Communist party USA. And there's Sam Graham-Felsen, who runs Obama's blog. He is a former writer for The Nation magazine and a contributor to the Socialist Viewpoint and is an admirer of Noam Chomsky. Here is what Felsen writes in the Socialist Viewpoint:
The capitalist ruling class of the United States exercises a virtual dictatorship not only over American society, but also over the entire world. This capitalist class rule is the basic cause of the poverty, wars and the degradation of the natural environment.

After being expelled from Socialist Action in 1999, we formed Socialist Workers Organization in an attempt to carry on the project of building a nucleus of a revolutionary party true to the historic teachings and program of Marx, Engels, Lenin and Trotsky.

Here is some of what Felsen says about Chomsky:
For me, hearing Chomsky speak for the first time was a life-changing experience. His ability to take preconceptions and destroy them-to completely remodel one's understanding of reality with cold, hard facts-blew me away. When I left what was then the ARCO Forum last fall, I felt as though I had been through the Matrix and back. Chomsky really has this effect because he bombards you with evidence and logic, not empty rhetoric. It is nearly impossible to hear him or read him-once you've actually checked his facts yourself (he even cites page numbers in public addresses)-and deny what he's saying.

And of course there is the views of Chomsky himself:
"The terrorist attacks were major atrocities. In scale they may not reach the level of many others, for example, Clinton's bombing of the Sudan with no credible pretext, destroying half its pharmaceutical supplies and killing unknown numbers of people."

"If the Nuremberg laws were applied today, then every Post-War American president would have to be hanged."
"Propaganda is to a democracy what the bludgeon is to a totalitarian state."
"Any dictator would admire the uniformity and obedience of the U.S. media."

"The United States is unusual among the industrial democracies in the rigidity of the system of ideological control - "indoctrination," we might say - exercised through the mass media. "

"Everybody's worried about stopping terrorism. Well, there's a really easy way: stop participating in it."

"I have often thought that if a rational Fascist dictatorship were to exist, then it would choose the American system."
Hat tip Israpundit

Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Dhimmitude at Michigan State

In another installment of Frontpage Mag's series on subversive islamic activities on campus, this one deals with Michigan State, where in April 2006, MSA-MSU held a rally protesting the Danish mohamed cartoons calling them "hate speech". And in response, Michigan State professor Indrek Wichman sent an e-mail to MSA-MSU explaining what he found more offensive than cartoons:
“Dear Muslim Association: As a professor of Mechanical Engineering here at MSU, I intend to protest your protest. I am offended not by cartoons, but by more mundane things like beheadings of civilians, cowardly attacks on public buildings, suicide murders, murders of Catholic priests (the latest in Turkey!), burnings of Christian churches, the continued persecution of Coptic Christians in Egypt, the imposition of Sharia law on non-Muslims, the rapes of Scandinavian girls and women (called ‘whores’ in your culture), the murder of film directors in Holland, and the rioting and looting in Paris France….If you do not like the values of the West -- see the 1st Amendment -- you are free to leave. I hope for God’s sake that most of you choose that option. Please return to your ancestral homelands and build them up yourselves instead of troubling Americans.”

In response to the e-mail, MSA-MSU along with 12 other student groups demanded Wichman be reprimanded and for the university institute mandatory diversity training for faculty and a seminar on hate and discrimination for freshmen. Given the nature of islamic teachings, of course it makes far more sense to institute mandatory diversity training and hate and discrimination seminars to muslim students. But in the topsy-turvey Orwellian world of leftist universities, critics of islamic intolerance and hatred are the ones who must be "taught" to tolerate diversity. Eventually MSU acquieced to CAIR and MSA bullying and instituted non-mandatory diversity training, including an islamic awareness workshop, as if we are not aware of islam. What it really is I'm sure, is a brainwashing and indoctrination course on the evils of America, Israel, the west and the inherent goodness and victimization of muslims.

In August of 2007, MSA-MSU again bullied Michigan State into spending $25,000 to install foot baths for muslim students in campus restrooms so they are able to practice their ritual washing of feet, hands, face and forearms before praying, which I'm also sure the university has accommodated muslims to do five times daily. No religion other than islamosupremacism is accommodated to such an extent on campus. Can you imagine Christians, Jews or others demanding accommodation for their religious practices in muslim countries? What do you think would be the response? We in the west are charitable to a fault, much to our own detriment. We should not be tolerating the intolerant.

Western Elites Submitting to Islam

With the insanity of political correctness, multiculturalism and fear, is it any wonder that muslim jihadists are certain they can demoralize and defeat the west from within. Increasingly western elites in the media, government, academia, the arts and so forth are choosing to submit to, rather than fight islamosupremacists.

It enrages me how morally bankrupt the west has become. Those such as the late Pim Fortuyn, who warn about the danger of the islamization of Europe, get condemned as being a threat and compared to hitler, instead of the islamists who actually resemble the nazis. When an imam advocates death for homosexuals, the BBC is more concerned about how his remark will reflect upon muslims rather than the evil he advocates. And that same BBC aires a documentary portraying fears about radical islam as overblown.

Among the things which make my blood boil are when artists who depict islam in a negative light, instead of being defended by their nations leaders, are blamed for the violent response of muslims and are forced to grovel and apologize to a roomfull of imams. And ambassadors from muslim nations interfere with the sovereign authority of western nations, demanding limits on free speech. And this is done with the acquiecence of pusillanimous western governments. When other artists who have no problem regularly attacking Christianity acknowledge they are too afraid to take on islam for fear of having their throats slashed. When polls which study the attitudes of muslims in the west skew the results to claim muslims reject extremism and terrorism, when the polls actually say a large percentage supports it. When the press reports on non-existent violence against muslims in order to shift focus away from actual violence perpetrated by muslims. When radical imams who justify suicide bombings are portrayed in newspaper profiles as harmless moderates and when someone like Daniel Pipes points out the truth about said imam, he gets depicted as the extremist. When Hollywood, under pressure from CAIR refuses to depict terrorists as muslims. What also gets me riled up is when Christian leaders and academics promote sharia law as being compatible and even superior to our own. When a media outlet gets repremanded by the British police for stirring up racial hatred by exposing the hatred of muslim preachers calling for the beating of wives and daughters, gays and apostates. When even our own American military prohibits uttering the word "jihad" and provides the staffs of military leaders with books sugarcoating the nature of islam. What's especially infuriating is when a German judge, sworn to uphold the laws of his nation, instead of protecting a muslim woman being brutally abused by her husband, rejects her request for a divorce because the Koran allows a husband to beat his wife. And the most dispicable expression of cowardice on the part of authorities of all, is when gangs of savage muslims are allowed to get away with raping 12 year old white girls because British authorities are fearful of upsetting race relations! This is how far the west has sunk into depravity that a government is refusing to protect little girls from predators. And it shows how far into the depths of depravity those who dare call themselves "liberals" or "progressives" have sunk when they stand in solidarity with those who murder women and gays. While in the west today, it is conservatives which defend liberal values and the human rights of gays and women.
Islam divides the world into two parts. The part governed by sharia, or Islamic law, is called the Dar al-Islam, or House of Submission. Everything else is the Dar al-Harb, or House of War, so called because it will take war—holy war, jihad—to bring it into the House of Submission. Over the centuries, this jihad has taken a variety of forms. Two centuries ago, for instance, Muslim pirates from North Africa captured ships and enslaved their crews, leading the U.S. to fight the Barbary Wars of 1801–05 and 1815. In recent decades, the jihadists’ weapon of choice has usually been the terrorist’s bomb; the use of planes as missiles on 9/11 was a variant of this method.

What has not been widely recognized is that the Ayatollah Khomeini’s 1989 fatwa against Satanic Verses author Salman Rushdie introduced a new kind of jihad. Instead of assaulting Western ships or buildings, Kho├émeini took aim at a fundamental Western freedom: freedom of speech. In recent years, other Islamists have joined this crusade, seeking to undermine Western societies’ basic liberties and extend sharia within those societies.

The cultural jihadists have enjoyed disturbing success. Two events in particular—the 2004 assassination in Amsterdam of Theo van Gogh in retaliation for his film about Islam’s oppression of women, and the global wave of riots, murders, and vandalism that followed a Danish newspaper’s 2005 publication of cartoons satirizing Mohammed—have had a massive ripple effect throughout the West. Motivated variously, and doubtless sometimes simultaneously, by fear, misguided sympathy, and multicultural ideology—which teaches us to belittle our freedoms and to genuflect to non-Western cultures, however repressive—people at every level of Western society, but especially elites, have allowed concerns about what fundamentalist Muslims will feel, think, or do to influence their actions and expressions. These Westerners have begun, in other words, to internalize the strictures of sharia, and thus implicitly to accept the deferential status of dhimmis—infidels living in Muslim societies.

Call it a cultural surrender. The House of War is slowly—or not so slowly, in Europe’s case—being absorbed into the House of Submission.
Continue reading

Foul Opinion Piece

I have a very low opinion of those who inhabit the media elite. They are among the lowest forms of life. Unfortunately these wretched, reprehensible creatures have the power to form the public's understanding and opinions of politics and national and world events, which are often skewed by the bias and even sometimes the evil agendas of reporters and opinion columnists who lie and spin in order to shape public opinion into mirroring their own warped vision of the world. This especially holds true when it comes to Middle East reporting, and the British media have been about the absolute worst as they so often portray the twisted view of Israel as villain and her terrorist enemies as victim.

One such British columnist for the Independent, Johann Hari, chose to honor Israel's 60th birthday by comparing Israel to excrement, an apt description of the writer himself, and by falsely accusing Israel of ethnic cleansing on the basis of an invented quote he claims was uttered by David Ben-Gurion.
"Whenever I try to mouth these words [of reassurance for Israel], a remembered smell fills my nostrils. It is the smell of shit."

Hari relies upon the notorious anti-Zionist historian Ilan Pappe, who openly acknowledges that he is not objective and cares little about factual accuracy, readily admitting that ideology drives his historical writings and statements.

Using Pappe's accusations of a systematic plan of "ethnic cleansing" of Palestinians to create the Israeli state, Hari quotes Israeli PM David Ben-Gurion: "The Arabs will have to go, but one needs an opportune moment for making it happen, such as a war."

Having previously employed this particular quote in a November 2006 op-ed, it is surprising that Hari has repeated it as "revisionist" historian and critic of Israel, Benny Morris, wrote in a letter at the time to The Independent, addressing the charge of "ethnic cleansing" and referring to the above quote as:

an invention, pure and simple, either by Hari or by whomever he is quoting (Ilan Pappe?)....

Neither Ben-Gurion nor the Zionist movement 'planned' the displacement of the 700,000-odd Arabs who moved or were removed from their homes in 1948. There was no such plan or blanket policy. Transfer was never adopted by the Zionist movement as part of its platform; on the contrary, the movement always accepted that the Jewish state that arose would contain a sizeable Arab minority.

He also questions the very legitimacy of Israel by ignoring 3000 years of Jewish history in the land and claims Arabs were there first.
"It [Palestine] was already inhabited by people who loved the land, and saw it as theirs."

And then he makes this utterly absurd analogy:
"How would we react if the 30m stateless, persecuted Kurds in the world sent armies and settlers into this country to seize everything in England below Leeds, and swiftly established a free Kurdistan from which we were expelled?"

Of course Kurds have no historical connection to England whereas Jews have 3000 years of historical links to Israel as proven through archeological findings.

He goes on to blame Israel for sewage problems in Judea and Samaria, complaining that the IDF restricts the entry of pipes through checkpoints, while failing to mention the reason why Israel restricts them, because hamas is using sewer pipes to manufacture qassam rockets. Read the rest of Honestreporting's critique of Hari's column.

Monday, April 28, 2008

Obama Pays Off Campaign Contributor

It would appear that hussein obama paid off a campaign contributor with a state grant. While Hussein obama was serving as an Illinois state senator, Chicago entrepreneur Robert Blackwell Jr. was paying obama an $8,000 a month retainer to give legal advice to his firm Electronic Knowledge Interchange. In return obama sent a letter requesting of Illinois officials to provide a $50,000 tourism promotion grant to another one of Blackwell's companies, Killerspin, which specializes in running table tennis tournaments. So much for his claiming to represent a new kind of politics. What Hussein Obama really represents is more of the old style gangsterism and cronism of Chicago Daley politics. It seems that the rest of the msm is covering up this story as they have done with Rezko.
After an unsuccessful campaign for Congress in 2000, Illinois state Sen. Barack Obama faced serious financial pressure: numerous debts, limited cash and a law practice he had neglected for a year. Help arrived in early 2001 from a significant new legal client — a longtime political supporter.

Chicago entrepreneur Robert Blackwell Jr. paid Obama an $8,000-a-month retainer to give legal advice to his growing technology firm, Electronic Knowledge Interchange. It allowed Obama to supplement his $58,000 part-time state Senate salary for over a year with regular payments from Blackwell’s firm that eventually totaled $112,000.

A few months after receiving his final payment from EKI, Obama sent a request on state Senate letterhead urging Illinois officials to provide a $50,000 tourism promotion grant to another Blackwell company, Killerspin.

Killerspin specializes in table tennis, running tournaments nationwide and selling its own line of equipment and apparel and DVD recordings of the competitions. With support from Obama, other state officials and an Obama aide who went to work part time for Killerspin, the company eventually obtained $320,000 in state grants between 2002 and 2004 to subsidize its tournaments.

Obama’s staff said the senator advocated only for the first year’s grant — which ended up being $20,000, not $50,000. The day after Obama wrote his letter urging the awarding of the state funds, Obama’s U.S. Senate campaign received a $1,000 donation from Blackwell.
Hat tip Hotair

Cultural Jihad in Florida Public School

The United American Committee Exposes a cultural jihad at a high school in Seminole county Florida. The class was called family dynamics, yet what actually occured during class was attempted islamic indoctrination under the guise of "cultural diversity". Parents rightfully complained that this is a violation of religion and state. Students say they didn't have a choice about whether they wanted to be involved. Thank God for groups like the UAC who are vigilant and stand as obstacles to the islamic jihadi fascists and are fighting for our American values and culture.

Another Terrorist Linked to Obama

A while back I had said that I believed Hussein Obama was likely receiving campaign money from terrorists. He has been able to raise more money than either Clinton or McCain and I've been wondering whether much of it is coming from the Middle East. Now my hunch has been confirmed by LGF. Terrorist fundraiser Hatem El-Hady who was chairman of the Islamic faux "charity" Kindhearts, a hamas front group, which has since been shut-down by the U.S. government for terror financing, is now raising money for the Hussein Obama campaign. He had a webpage over at Hussein's official website and there were three friends listed on that page and one of them was Michelle Obama. Not only was Michelle's name scrubbed from the page but now the entire page has been scrubbed. Little Green Footballs captured the screenshots. America needs to wake up. I don't know what more evidence needs to emerge proving Hussein Obama is a dangerous radical who should never get to the White House. There is a pattern here which can not continue to be dismissed by his defenders.

Sunday, April 27, 2008

Obama Advisor Wants to Disarm Israel of its Nukes

The pattern of far left anti-Israel foreign policy advisors chosen by Obama continues unabated. This particular top advisor Joseph Cirincione, blames Israel for nuclear proliferation in the Middle East and believes that Israel should be disarmed of its nuclear weapons so that other countries in the region would supposedly be willing to forgo their own nuclear ambitions. He claims that the pursuit of nuclear weapons by Middle Eastern countries only came about as a response to Israel's nuclear weapons. But as the article points out, there are reasons other than Israel that these countries desire nuclear weapons, such as monetary and geopolitical reasons. In the cases of Pakistan and North Korea, they are making billions selling nuclear technology. Iran wants to be the hegmonic power in the region as well as having theological reasons for developing nuclear weapons, like ahmadenijad's belief that the destruction of the world will usher in the return of the shiite hidden imam.

After Israel's strike on Syria's nuclear facility last September, Cirincione wrote that the idea that this facility was a North Korean built and designed plutonium reactor was a lie and he said Israel was attempting to thwart any dialogue between the US and Syria:
Who was behind this nefarious manipulation? It appears, wrote Circincione, “to be the work of a small group of officials leaking cherry-picked, unvetted ‘intelligence’ to key reporters in order to promote a preexisting political agenda.” What exactly was that political agenda? “[I]t appears aimed at derailing the U.S.-North Korean agreement that administration hardliners think is appeasement.” There was also a dose of Zionist mischief thrown in: “Some Israelis want to thwart any dialogue between the U.S. and Syria.”

But as we witnessed this past week, intelligence officials briefing Congress showed incontrovertable proof that indeed the Israeli bombed facility WAS a plutonium producing reactor meant for the production of material for nuclear weapons.

In 2006, Cirincione absurdly declared that Israel's bombing of Iraq's Osirak nuclear plant in 1981, was a failure because it lead to saddam hussein speeding up Iraq's nuclear program and led to a more devoted effort to secretly build nuclear weapons capabilities. Yet this contradicts Cirincione's own claim that Iraq did not have nuclear weapons at the time of the U.S. invasion, and that therefore America should not have gone to war with Iraq. He of course opposes any military strike against Iran's nuclear weapons program.

Cirincione wrote in 2005 that Israel has never been more secure from external threats and has less need for nuclear weapons than any time in its history and calls for an even-handed approach toward nuclear weapons programs. But nuclear weapons are precisely the reason Israel is secure from external threats. What would prevent Israel's far larger enemies from launching an attack with conventional or even chemical or biological weapons with the knowledge that Israel has been disarmed of nuclear weapons, the only deterrent Israel has from its genocidal enemies.

America does not need a president who has such a morally skewed view of the world in which he believes that Israel's possession of nuclear weapons are the real threat to the world, and her enemies desire to obtain nukes is merely a defensive measure against Israel! And therefore it is Israel who should be disarmed of its nukes in the naive belief that Iran will be encouraged to forgo its desire for nuclear weapons. I am being generous in suggesting that Cirincione is merely being naive, when it might just be that he and Obama have much more nefarious reasons for wanting to strip Israel of its nukes. I don't want a president with an "even-handed" approach between Israel and its enemies. This is morally bankrupt. I am assuming this is the belief of Hussein Obama since he has hired Joseph Cirincione as an advisor on the Middle East.
Commentary Magazine's Gabriel Schoenfeld has noted that another Obama adviser, Joseph Cirincione, seems to have anti-Israel views. His senior aide on nuclear non-proliferation had denounced reports that North Korea had been helping Syria build a nuclear reactor and said such reports were nonsense and were, in part, promoted so as to derail talks with Syria.

Cirincione had written after Israel's strike against the suspected Syrian nuclear plant that stories about it being a North-Korean designed and built plutonium reactor were a lie -- a fiction being spread just as reports had been spread before the Iraq War that misled the press regarding Iraq's program. Shcoenfeld writes:
Who was behind this nefarious manipulation? It appears, wrote Circincione, “to be the work of a small group of officials leaking cherry-picked, unvetted ‘intelligence’ to key reporters in order to promote a preexisting political agenda.” What exactly was that political agenda? “[I]t appears aimed at derailing the U.S.-North Korean agreement that administration hardliners think is appeasement.” There was also a dose of Zionist mischief thrown in: “Some Israelis want to thwart any dialogue between the U.S. and Syria.”

Based on evidence shown to Congress yesterday, there is now incontrovertible proof that the building bombed by Israel was a plutonium-producing reactor that was geared toward the production of material for nuclear weapons -- exactly what Cirincionne had previously dismissed as lies, in part, cooked up by Israelis trying to influence America's foreign policy.
This tendency to blame and castigate Israel was not the first time phenomenon for Joseph Cirincione. He seems to have a penchant for targeting Israel for opprobrium.

In 2002, he wrote that Israel's possession of three diesel nuclear power submarines that can launch nuclear missiles complicates American efforts to restrain a nuclear arms race. He also claimed that the US Navy monitored the Israeli testing of a new cruise missile from a submarine in 2002 off of Sri Lanka, according to unnamed "former Pentagon officials".

There is no verifiable proof that Israel launched such missiles, just a claim by Cirincione. He also blamed Israel for stoking an arms race that is creating a difficult situation not just for the United States, but also for preventing other nations that have signed the nuclear non-proliferation treaty from breaking away.
Continue reading

Black Liberation Theology and Obama

Here is Glen Beck of CNN explaining "black liberation theology", the belief doctrine held by Hussein Obama's pastor and spiritual mentor Jeremiah Wright, and his church TUCC. Wright looks up to James Cone and has praised his book Black Power and Black Theology. Here is Cone explaining the meaning of black liberation theology:
Black theology refuses to accept a God who is not identified totally with the goals of the black community. If God is not for us and against white people, then he is a murderer. And we had better kill him. The task of black theology is to kill Gods who do not belong to the black community. Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy. What we need is the divine love as expressed in black power. Which is the power of black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal. Unless God is participating in this holy activity, we must reject His love.
Very sick shit. And this is who Jeremiah Wright has as his role model. Does Obama share these views? We certainly have the right to examine that. If not, why has he been a member of this church and sat listening to these toxic sermons for twenty years? We have the right to ask such questions of someone running for president of the United States. Hussein Obama of course thinks discussing such matters amounts to playing dirty politics, but it is perfectly legitimate to examine the extremist, hateful views of someone he himself considers family and has been involved with for twenty years. His campaign and supporters attempt to twist things around by labeling as "racist" anyone who finds Obama's own racist ties offensive and fair game in this election.

Columbia U Intifada

Here's another installment of Frontpage Mag's series on islamic anti-American and antisemitic activities on American campuses. This segment deals with the Muslim Student Association of Columbia University, which among other nefarious activities, attempts to quash free expression. In 2006 MSA-CU was among 52 muslim groups who signed a press release denouncing the Danish cartoons which stated:“We are protesting the newspapers’ insult to Islam. … Freedom of expression is not absolute.”

The notorious self-loathing Jew, hezbollah supporter and holocaust denier, Norman Finkelstein, was invited by the MSA-CU to deliver a speech in March 2006 called “Israel and Palestine: Misuse of Anti-Semitism, Abuse of History.” In the speech he accused Columbia president Lee Bollinger of "intellectual terrorism" for refusing to support a divestment campaign against Israel and refusing to label Israel as an "apartheid" state.

During the October 2007 Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week, MSU-CU Vice President Amreen Vora complained because David Horowitz correctly characterized the word "jihad" as meaning "holy war", which Vora claims really means a spiritual struggle, a false canard that islamists frequently tell gullible westerners in order for us to lower our guard and make us easy prey. Then Horowitz asked Vora if she would publicly denounce the terror group hamas, but she and the MSU refused to do so.

Saturday, April 26, 2008

Obama's Terrorist Friends

Hussein Obama considers it "dirty politics" for anyone to bring up the legitimate issue of his own CHOICE to befriend radicals and terrorists such as the Weather Underground's Bill Ayers, and Bernadine Dohrn, who was a member of Students for a Democratic Society and publicly approved of the Charles Manson murders.

In 1995, retiring Illinois state Senator Alice Palmer handpicked obama to be her successor and held a function at the home of Ayers and Dohrn in order to introduce obama to influential liberals in her district.

Hussein says because he was only eight years old at the time Ayers was committing acts of terrorism with the Weathermen, the issue is irrelevant and he considers it out-of-bounds to make his friendship with them a campaign issue. However in 2001, Ayers wrote an op-ed in the NYTimes, which was published, of all days, on September 11, where he said he didn't regret attempting to murder soldiers and policemen and that he only regrets that he hadn't planted more bombs. And as recently as 2007, Ayers and Dohrn attended a reunion of Students for a Democratic Society. And also here is what Ayers had to say about America in 2007:
Empire resurrected and unapologetic, war without end, and undefined enemy that's supposed to be a rallying point for a new, energized, jingoistic patriotism. Unprecedented and unapologetic military expansion, white supremacy changing its form, but essentially in tact. Attacks on women and girls, violent attacks, growing surveillance in every sphere of our lives and on and on and on and the targeting of gay and lesbian people as a kind of scapegoating gesture to keep our minds off what's really happening

Of course the irony is that violence against women and girls and the targeting of gay and lesbian people are being perpetrated by the very islamofascists we are fighting and who people like Ayers are defending.

For her part, Dohrn, at the same 2007 event called America a "monster"
And it was an incredible thing for him to say, the greatest purveyor of violence on this Earth is my own country. There were certainly other purveyors of violence. I think that's still true today. If we think its true today, and has incredible implications for all of us right now, we who are, as we used to say, "in the belly of the beast", it again means, not that its the only purveyor of violence in the world, but that we have an extraordinary, special responsibility, not neccessarily the most enviable one, of how to act here, inside the heart of the monster.

These are the unrepentent radicals, terrorists and haters of America who Hussein Obama has a pattern of CHOOSING to associate with. Yet along with his supporters, lashes out in anger against those who dare to dredge up these friendships, accusing them of engaging in dirty politics. Yet how could it not be legitimate to question either the judgement or militant political persuasion of someone running for president of the United States? It is time Barack Hussein Obama took responsibility for his actions and explained to America his penchant for gravitating towards such unsavory characters. Either he agrees with their anti-American views or he is so hungry for power that he was willing to associate with anyone in Chicago who could help him further his political ambitions. In either case, it bodes ill for obama's character and proves he is unfit and untrustworthy to serve in the highest office in the land. Hat tip Powerline

Sacrificing Israel to Appease Islamic Jihadists

President Bush's meeting with Abbas.
PRESIDENT BUSH: Thanks for coming. Mr. President, I appreciate a chance to talk about peace. I assured the President that a Palestinian state is a high priority for me and my administration -- a viable state, a state that doesn't look like Swiss cheese, a state that provides hope. It's in -- I believe it's in Israel's interest and the Palestinian people's interest to have leaders willing to work toward the achievement of that state.

Of course there cannot be a contiguous palestinian state without cutting Israel in half given that the two territories are on opposite sides of Israel. One has to ask why a palestinian state must be contiguous in order to be viable but it is perfectly acceptable to chop Israel in half? The west, including the US has every intention of offering up Israel as a sacrificial lamb to appease the muslim world. There is no possibility of creating a palestinian state, especially one that is contiguous, without destroying Israel.

The people that can deliver that state, that vision, to the Palestinian people were sitting right here in the Oval Office, led by the President. The President is a man of peace. He's a man of vision. He rejects the idea of using violence to achieve objectives, which distinguishes him from other people in the region. I'm confident we can achieve the definition of a state. I'm also confident it's going to require hard work.

Abbas has never rejected the use of violence and he isn't a man of peace. In fact Abbas has said he would not rule out renewing terror attacks against Israel if Israel does not give in to all of his demands. Just recently Abbas intended to give the Al Kuds mark of honor, the PA's highest award, to two female terrorists who aided in the murder of Israelis. Ahlam Tamimi drove the suicide bomber who exploded himself in the Sbarro restaurant and Amra Muna seduced Ophir Rahum over the internet and lured him to Ramallah where he was murdered. Under pressure however, Abbas withdrew the awards. But the fact that he considered giving them in the first place proves he is no moderate. Abbas' fatah is responsible for recent murders of Israelis, such as the Yeshiva massacre, the murder of two Israeli security guards near Netanya. Hat tip Israpundit

U.S. Reneging On Deal With Israel?

Olmert is saying that Bush's 2004 letter to PM Sharon gave permission to expand major communities in Judea and Samaria but the U.S. is denying any such agreement exists and Rice is even criticizing expansion of communities on the outskirts of Jerusalem.
..."It was clear from day one to Abbas, Rice and Bush that construction would continue in population concentrations -- the areas mentioned in Bush's 2004 letter," Olmert declared in an interview with the Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth, published Sunday. "I say this again today: Beitar Illit will be built, Gush Etzion will be built; there will be construction in Pisgat Ze'ev and in the Jewish neighborhoods in Jerusalem," referring to new settlement expansion plans. "It's clear that these areas will remain under Israeli control in any future settlement."

In a key sentence in Bush's 2004 letter, the president stated, "In light of new realities on the ground, including already existing major Israeli populations centers, it is unrealistic to expect that the outcome of final status negotiations will be a full and complete return to the armistice lines of 1949."

In a companion letter to "reconfirm" U.S.-Israeli understandings, Weissglas wrote Rice that restrictions on the growth of settlements would be made "within the agreed principles of settlement activities," which would include "a better definition of the construction line of settlements" on the West Bank. A joint U.S.-Israeli team would "jointly define the construction line of each of the settlements."

Weissglas said that the letter built upon a prior understanding between then-Foreign Minister Shimon Peres and then-Secretary of State Colin L. Powell, which would allow Israel to build up settlements within existing construction lines. But Powell denied that. "I never agreed to it," he said in an e-mail.

Daniel Kurtzer, then the U.S. ambassador to Israel, said he argued at the time against accepting the Weissglas letter. "I thought it was a really bad idea," he said. "It would legitimize the settlements, and it gave them a blank check." In the end, Kurtzer said the White House never followed up with the plan to define construction lines. "Washington lost interest in it when it became clear it would not be easy to do," he said.

National security adviser Stephen J. Hadley, at a news briefing in January, suggested that Bush's 2004 letter was aimed at helping Sharon win domestic approval for the Gaza withdrawal. "The president obviously still stands by that letter of April of 2004, but you need to look at it, obviously, in the context of which it was issued," he said

Essentially what Hadley is saying is that in his 2004 letter, president Bush deceived Sharon so that he would surrender Gaza and had no intention of keeping his word. Hat tip Israpundit

Friday, April 25, 2008

There Really Is A Syria, N Korea Axis of Evil

Intelligence officials confirm with a videotape and other evidence, that the facility in Syria which Israel bombed last September was indeed a nuclear reactor being built with the assistance of North Korea. It was only weeks away from being functional. So to those who mocked and snickered at the idea, there really IS an "axis of evil" consisting of N.Korea, Syria and Iran.
WASHINGTON — A Syrian nuclear reactor built with help from North Korea was weeks away from functioning, a top U.S. official said Thursday after lawmakers were briefed on the site destroyed last year by Israeli jets.

The official, who wanted anonymity, told The Associated Press that the facility was mostly completed but still needed significant testing before it could be declared operational.

Still, Syria's ambassador to the United Kingdom denied that North Korea's cooperation with Syria had any nefarious purpose.

"This has nothing to do with North Korea and Syria. They just want to exert more pressure on North Korea. This is why they are coming up with this story," Sami al-Khiyami told Reuters.

"The cooperation between North Korea and Syria has nothing to do with (building) a nuclear facility. Cooperation is mainly economic. ... This is political manipulation ahead of the talks with North Korea to exert more pressure on them," he said.

U.S. lawmakers on Thursday said the construction of a nuclear facility in Syria was a major setback to non-proliferation efforts, even as many questioned the timing of the release of the information.

The reactor was destroyed by Israeli jets in September 2007. Nonetheless, its construction indicates a real threat of the spread of nuclear weapons technology, lawmakers said.

It "is a serious proliferation issue, both for the Middle East and the countries that may be involved in Asia," said Michigan Rep. Pete Hoekstra, the ranking Republican on the House Intelligence Committee.

Intelligence officials told several House and Senate committees that the destroyed site was designed to produce a small amount of plutonium, a highly radioactive substance.
Continue Hat tip Smooth Stone

Anti-War Heckler Punches Disabled Girl

Moonbat "peace" protester heckles Laura Bush and her daughter Jenna and then punches a girl in a wheelchair after her parents had told the whackjob to shut the fuck up. Well, they didn't actually say it that way. The event had nothing whatsoever to do with Iraq. Laura and Jenna were there promoting their children's book. Peaceniks don't live up to their own lofty rhetoric of non-violence. They are some of the most angry, violent people.
A man heckling First Lady Laura Bush and daughter Jenna outside the 92nd Street Y was arrested after he punched a wheelchair-bound girl whose parents had told him to shut up, authorities said yesterday. German Talis, 22, was shouting obscenities at the Bushes, who were leaving the building Tuesday, when he crossed paths with Wendy and John Lovetro and their daughter Maureen, 18, who has cerebral palsy.

They had been in the audience to hear the Bushes talk about their children's book, "Read All About It."

"He began yelling about Iraq and Iran at Jenna Bush. She was waving at the crowd. I told the guy, 'What are you doing? Shut up. This is about a child and books,' " said John Lovetro. "He was unperturbed. I said, 'Get out of here! You're being a moron!' "

The next thing he knew, Talis was allegedly punching Maureen - a fan of the first lady since meeting her in 2004.

"I heard my daughter hysterical yelling, 'He's hitting me!' " said Wendy Lovetro.

"He punched her on the shoulder blades, but that wasn't enough," she said.

"My husband pushed the wheelchair away from him and he reached beyond my husband and began pounding my daughter in the thigh."

The two men fought as the president's family drove off. Cops broke them up and busted Talis on charges of assault and resisting arrest.

Maureen was not seriously injured.

Foggy Bottom Bans the word "Jihad"

How is it remotely possible to win the war against islamic fascism when our government is more concerned with avoiding offending the sensibilities of our enemies than defeating them? During WW2 we did not worry about offending the Germans and Japanese. Now the State Department is instituting politically correct speech codes. Robert Spencer reports that they are forbidding their officials from using the words "jihad" or "jihadist". They have bought into the nonsense that the word jihad really means peaceful inner struggle to millions of supposedly peaceful muslims, and that the terrorists are misusing the term jihad. Of course this is merely propaganda that muslims tell gullible westerners. Jihad does in fact mean "holy war". Al qaeda and the other terror groups are doing precisely what their koran instructs them to do.
...The argument, of course, is the old Streusand/Guirard claim that by using the word jihad, we're validating the jihadist claim to be waging jihad. Of course, it's ridiculous to think that the U.S. State Department carries any validating authority within the Islamic world to determine what is Islam and what isn't. This would be the first time that unbelievers have set the meaning of Islamic theology for Muslims.

Also, the claim is that by using the word "jihad," we are insulting the peaceful Muslims who are waging the daily jihad of the struggle against sin, the struggle against the dirty dishes, etc. And that's great, if that's what any Muslim actually believes is the sum and substance of jihad, but it is an understanding of jihad that is at odds with the Qur'an, the Sunnah, and all the schools of Islamic jurisprudence. Will Muslims be insulted by a reference to other Muslims using the traditional primary meaning of jihad? Answer: probably. But that doesn't negate the traditional status of that meaning, or the influence of that traditional view in the Islamic world.

Thursday, April 24, 2008

The Government Should Be Seeking Real Enemies

Regarding the sudden suspicious arrest of 85 year old retired American Jew, Ben-Ami Kadish, for passing secrets to Israel more than two decades ago, Jerry Gordon of Israpundit wonders whether David Szady, Associate Director of the FBI for counterintelligence, is behind it. For a bit of background on Szady, he was at the center of the AIPAC case as well as Jewish CIA employee Adam Ciralsky who was accused of dual loyalty to Israel and lacking candor in disclosing his contacts with foreign nationals. He was grilled about every Israeli he had ever met from the time he was Bar Mitzvah'ed. Anyway, Szady is an antisemite who is obsessed with persecuting and hounding Jewish employees of the CIA because he believes them all to have "dual loyalties" to Israel. Here are some excerpts about Szady's Jew-baiting from Ken Timmerman's book Shadow Warriors:
“While at the CIA, Szady hounded an entry-level Jewish lawyer named Adam Ciralsky, apparently on no other ground than his religion. Just days after Ciralsky joined the CIA, Agency security officers opened a special file on his Jewish background. They included a classified four page “Jewish resume” of Ciralsky that identified teenage trips to Israel and work as a Jewish camp counselor as indicators of possible disloyalty.

Like many of his former colleagues at the CIA and in Division 5 of the FBI, the counterintelligence section, David Szady believed that Israel had a high-placed intelligence asset in the U.S. government, whom they sometimes referred to as “Mr. X.”

It’s no longer just our traditional adversaries who want to steal our secrets but sometimes our allies,” Szady said.” The threat is incredibly serious”. It was Szady who fired up the AIPAC investigations, soon after he was called back from forced retirement by FBI director Robert Mueller in early 2002.”

‘When I asked Richard Perle his opinion of David Szady and his reported hunt for traitorous Jews, he just shrugged. “David Szady is a nutcase,” Perle said. “He brought in as a consultant this guy Stephen Green from Vermont who believes there’s a Jonathan Pollard under every bed. It’s like bringing in a Holocaust denier. It’s just not serious.”

Green , sixty-four, a former UN official claimed to be an ‘investigator’ of secret isareli networks in the US. He had just penned a vicious article in a left wing webzine that dredged up well known accusations against top neo-cons in the Bush administration and accused them of ‘dual loyalty’ to Israel. It was that article that apparently caught David Szady’s attention and prompted him to use Green as an “expert” on AIPAC.

When questioned about Szady’s motivation, on FBI spokesman denied that Szady ever been driven by anti-Semitism.

This behavior is a throwback to the days of McCarthy. Meanwhile as the CIA and FBI look under every bed for “dual loyaltist” Jews, they are welcoming with open arms, America’s real enemies into our midst, muslim jihadists, who are actively being recruited into these agencies through extremist muslim groups and even advertising on radical Arab websites. And these people cannot even be categorized as “duel loyalists” because they have no loyalty to America. The CIA and FBI better get its priorities straight and weed out the real enemies within its midst.

Another Low-Life Endorses Obama

Another unsavory character who has endorsed Hussein Obama for president is the guy who referred to the terrorists in Iraq slaughtering our soldiers as well as innocent children, "minutemen", and gleefully predicted a jihadi victory over America. Recall Michael Moore's repulsive words as posted on his website:
The Iraqis who have risen up against the occupation are not “insurgents” or “terrorists” or “The Enemy.” They are the REVOLUTION, the Minutemen, and their numbers will grow — and they will win. Get it, Mr. Bush?

And here is an excerpt of his endorsement of Hussein:

I don’t get to vote for President this primary season. I live in Michigan. The party leaders (both here and in D.C.) couldn’t get their act together, and thus our votes will not be counted.
So, if you live in Pennsylvania, can you do me a favor? Will you please cast my vote — and yours — on Tuesday for Senator Barack Obama?

…I guess the debate last week was the final straw. I’ve watched Senator Clinton and her husband play this game of appealing to the worst side of white people, but last Wednesday, when she hurled the name “Farrakhan” out of nowhere, well that’s when the silly season came to an early end for me. She said the “F” word to scare white people, pure and simple. Of course, Obama has no connection to Farrakhan. But, according to Senator Clinton, Obama’s pastor does — AND the “church bulletin” once included a Los Angeles Times op-ed from some guy with Hamas! No, not the church bulletin!

As typical of his cult followers, Hussein Obama is not to be held responsible for his CHOICE in being a member of a church which believes in black liberation theology and black nationalism. He is also not to be held accountable for choosing to associate with various other haters of America, including terrorists. Though hussein obama may not have a direct connection to farrakhan, the fact that he remained a member of a church even after they honored him is indeed a relevant issue, something leftists like moore would be excoriating any white candidate if said candidate were a long time member of a racist church which honored a white supremacist. And doesn't this church appeal to the worst side of black people? I'm tired of the double standard when it comes to racism. And while Hussein and his sychophants whine that dirty tactics are being used against him, remember that he was schooled in the political gangsterism of Chicago politics. During his run for the Illinois state senate, Hussein Obama sued to have all of this opponents removed from the ballot and succeeded. And then in the US senate primary race, Obama at one point was trailing his opponent in the race when suddenly his opponent's divorce records were released to the public. And of course there was the race-baiting this year in the SC primary after hussein trailed Hillary Clinton even amongst blacks. So, Hussein is no stranger to fighting dirty. Therefore his campaign and supporters ought to stop portraying him as poor put upon victim. Hat tip Israpundit.

Dutch Gays Voting Conservative

As gays in Holland are routinely beaten up by hordes of young savage muslim immigrants, they are increasingly turning to conservative parties. How ironic it is that gays, at least in Holland, are finding themselves more comfortable and safe in right wing parties while "liberals" present the true danger to gays and women because of their appeasement of, and often alliance with islamic fascists.
If only homosexuals were to vote, Proud of the Netherlands (TON) would be the biggest party in the Lower House. Conservative parties are more favoured among them than progressive ones, a poll by TV programme NOVA reveals.

NOVA carried out the survey in cooperation with gay publications Gaykrant and TON pulled in the votes of 19 percent of the readers of Gaykrant. From, the party of Rita Verdonk won as much as 33 percent. Among all of the Dutch, 13 percent would vote for TON, according to NOVA.
- - - - - - - - -
The centre-left D66 party scored best with Gaykrant readers: 22 percent. With, it scored 14 percent. Together, this makes D66 the second party for homosexuals. Among all of the Dutch, only 3 percent would vote D66.

NOVA said this was the first time a survey has been carried out on such a large scale of the gay vote. It did say that compared with a Gaykrant survey from 1997, leftwing parties have dropped out of favour. TON and the Party for Freedom (PVV) of anti-Islam champion Geert Wilders have prompted strong growth towards the right.

In 2007, the Socialist Party (SP), Labour (PvdA) and the leftwing Greens (GroenLinks) together captured 40 percent of the gay vote, compared with just 25 percent now. Together with TON and PVV, the conservatives (VVD) and Christian democrats (CDA) would now win a combined 45 percent, up from 35 percent in 1997. TON’s Verdonk and Wilders’ PVV have emerged from the VVD.

In the NOVA poll, PvdA scores 7 percent on average among the gays. GroenLinks does better with 10 percent, while the SP gets 7 percent of the gay vote. The VVD would win 9 percent of the votes and PVV, 8 percent. CDA, the biggest Lower House party, traditionally has a very low score among homosexuals (4 percent).

Wednesday, April 23, 2008

Alternative Mideast Plan

An alternative plan written by Rachel Neuwirth and Bertram Cohen to finally resolve the Arab-Israeli conflict, proposes to relocate the palestinians to Saudi Arabia, where there is an abundance of land, rather than carve out a palestinian state from the already miniscule state of Israel, which constitutes merely 0.2% of land in the Middle East, and in which the Arabs have no historic right to a sovereign state there. Rather than result in peaceful coexistence, the creation of a palestinian state in Judea, Samaria and Gaza would simply be just another terror state hostile to Israel and cause more war and instability in the region. Western leaders surely know this, yet they persist in this endeavor, forcing Israel to retreat to ever shrinking borders.

The P.A.I.R. Initiative is divided into five parts. Each part contains multiple topics arranged in modular form. Where details are too extensive to be contained within the main body of the text, readers are then referred to a corresponding entry in the Appendixes.

Part I of the plan presents a brief summary of the actual historical background of the conflict between Jews, Arabs and Muslims over the country called the Land of Israel by Jews and Palestine by others. Although well documented, this history has been obscured and even suppressed by decades of distorted, misleading and even completely false propaganda. We present this brief historical summary as the first section of our initiative because we believe that peace is not possible without a knowledge of, and acknowledgment of, the truth.

Part II of the plan argues that the present approaches to an Arab-Israeli settlement are fatally flawed and cannot bring peace. It demonstrates why the current Roadmap proposal, backed by the “Quartet” of powers (The United States, The European Union, Russia, and the United Nations) cannot work and is bad for both Arabs and Jews.

The currently dominant approaches to peace are inherently impractical, illogical and small minded. It is essential that this old thinking first be discarded in order to open the way for consideration of fresh ideas and a true win-win solution. What is needed is fresh thinking that is bold, optimistic and even visionary, so that the descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob will be able ultimately to reconcile with the descendants of Abraham, Ishmael and Esau. Nothing less can succeed.

Part III outlines our plan for resolving the conflict between Israel and the Arab-Muslim world, and for solving the problems of the Palestinian Arabs who have been without a state of their own. Central to this plan are:
a) A complete suppression of all terrorist organizations.

b) The freezing and confiscation of these organizations’ assets, and their reallocation towards solving the legitimate needs and aspirations of the Palestinian Arab people.

c) A Reeducation for Peace plan that would involve a course of instruction for all Palestinian Arabs and all of the peoples of the Middle East in the actual facts of Jewish and Israeli history, the actual character of the Jewish religion and its relationship to Islam and Christianity, and related matters. This reeducation program is essential to correct the misconceptions and outright lies about Israel and Jews that have been implanted in the Arab and Muslim peoples by decades of war propaganda in both schools and the mass media.

d) A phased, peaceful, long-term resettlement solution. It demands full recognition for Jewish rights while preserving legitimate Arab rights. The Palestinian Arabs would be offered a far better future, including a much larger independent state of their own, than under any competing plan.

One glance at the map of the Middle East virtually shouts out the logical solution. Twenty one Arab states already have more than 99% of the land in the region between The Atlantic coast of Morocco and the western border of Iran, and can easily accommodate resettlement of their Palestinian Arab brethren with ample land for them on which to live and thrive in their own independent state. And Saudi Arabia is a prime candidate to offer 35,000 square miles, comprising only 4% of its vast territory, for a Palestinian Arab State which would be 15 times the size of the West Bank and Gaza combined. It is now time for the Saudi rulers themselves to ‘take a risk for peace’

The Jewish people, with only 0.2% of the land between Morocco and Iran, need the entire original territory set aside for the Jewish National Home by the League of Nations Mandate for Palestine, together with the Golan Heights, consisting in total of only10, 300 square miles (roughly the size of the state of New Hampshire), free of hostile terrorists, so that they too can live and develop securely in a State of Israel that can permanently maintain its Jewish character.

This is an excellent plan, which is precisely why it will never be accomplished. If the Arab-muslim world were actually concerned for the plight of these people they call Palestinians, they would support such an initiative. But for the Arab and muslim world, the palestinians are merely political pawns to be used to destroy Israel, they have no interest whatsoever in their well-being or in peaceful coexistence. So this idea is merely a pipe-dream. Hat tip Israpundit.

Tuesday, April 22, 2008

We Musn't Call Muslim Terrorists "Islamic"

The Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) doesn't want John McCain to refer to muslims who commit terrorism in the name of islam, as "islamic".
A coalition of American Muslim groups is demanding that Sen. John McCain stop using the adjective "Islamic" to describe terrorists and extremist enemies of the United States.

Muneer Fareed, who heads the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), told The Washington Times that his group is beginning a campaign to persuade Mr. McCain to rephrase his descriptions of the enemy.

"We've tried to contact his office, contact his spokesperson to have them rethink word usage that is more acceptable to the Muslim community," Mr. Fareed said. "If it's not our intent to paint everyone with the same brush, then certainly we should think seriously about just characterizing them as criminals, because that is what they are."

An aide to Mr. McCain, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee who is counting on his pro-Iraq war stance to attract conservative voters, said the senator from Arizona will not drop the word.

Steve Schmidt, a former Bush White House aide who is now a McCain media strategist, told The Times that the use of the word is appropriate and that the candidate will continue to define the enemy that way.

"Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda represent a perverted strain of Islam at odds with the great many peaceful Muslims who practice their great faith peacefully," Mr. Schmidt said. "But the reality is, the hateful ideology which underpins bin Ladenism is properly described as radical Islamic extremism. Senator McCain refers to it that way because that is what it is."

Mr. McCain often uses the term "Islamic" to describe terrorist enemies. The two remaining Democrats in the presidential field, Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois and Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York, generally shun such word usage.

President Bush also avoids the term, prompting criticism from some conservative pundits, who say the White-House-coined phrase "war on terror" does not sufficiently identify the enemy. Mr. Bush used the term "Islamic fascists" several times in 2006 and was criticized by Muslims.

How do you fight a war when you fear even identifying who the enemy actually is?

ISNA promotes itself as a voice of moderation that seeks Muslim-Jewish reconciliation and campaigns against what it calls "Islamophobia."

There's nothing moderate about ISNA. It was founded by the Saudi funded Muslim Students Association with the help of sami al-arian who supports suicide bombings against Israel and raised money for hamas. He currently is serving a brief prison sentence for conspiracy to provide services to the islamic jihad. ISNA provides wahhabi theological indoctrination materials to mosques throughout North America. ISNA convenes annual conferences where radical muslims are given a platform to incite hatred and violence. One such speaker was PLO official Yusuf Al-Qaradhawi who supports al qaeda. ISNA has also held fundraisers for terrorists such as hamas' mousa marzook. This is just a small sample of ISNA's radical activities. Read more about ISNA here.

Carter is Deluded

Just when I think former president Jimmy Carter can't get anymore reprehensible, he outdoes himself. He must think we are as gullible as he pretends to be when it comes to enemies of Israel. He says that hamas is prepared to accept the right of Israel to "live as a neighbor next door in peace." To Carter's twisted way of thinking, the fault for the lack of peace lies not with the hamas terrorists and their Syrian sponsors, but instead he blames the US and Israel for isolating hamas and Syria. At no time does he condemn the rocket attacks or Syria and Iran's arming, funding and training of terrorists. Nor does he have anything to say about the incitement of hatred and violence in mosques, media and schools. As far as Carter is concerned, the onus for peace lies with the US and Israel. Even the normally Arabist State Department dismissed Carter's interpretation of the situation.
..."They (Hamas) said that they would accept a Palestinian state on the 1967 borders, if approved by Palestinians and that they would accept the right of Israel to live as a neighbor next door in peace," Carter said.

The borders he referred to were the frontiers that existed before Israel captured large swaths of Arab lands in the 1967 Mideast war — including the West Bank, east Jerusalem and Gaza.

In the past, Hamas officials have said they would establish a "peace in stages" if Israel were to withdraw to the borders it held before 1967. But it has been evasive about how it sees the final borders of a Palestinian state and has not abandoned its official call for Israel's destruction.

Israel, which evacuated Gaza in 2005, has accepted the idea of a Palestinian state there and in much of the West Bank. But it has resisted Palestinian demands that it return to its 1967 frontiers.

Carter urged Israel to engage in direct negotiations with Hamas, saying failure to do so was hampering peace efforts.

"We do not believe that peace is likely and certainly that peace is not sustainable unless a way is found to bring Hamas into the discussions in some way," he said. "The present strategy of excluding Hamas and excluding Syria is just not working."

Israel considers Hamas to be a terrorist group and has shunned Carter because of his meetings with Hamas' supreme chief, Khaled Mashaal, and other Hamas figures. Hamas has been behind dozens of suicide bombings and other attacks that have killed some 250 Israelis.

Syria harbors Hamas' exiled leadership in its capital, Damascus, and supports the Lebanese Hezbollah guerrillas who warred with Israel in the summer of 2006. The U.S. considers both Hamas and Hezbollah terrorist organizations.

In Washington, the State Department dismissed Carter's assessment of his meetings, saying there was no indication Hamas wanted peace with Israel.

"What is clear to us is that there certainly is no change in Hamas' position," said deputy spokesman Tom Casey. "It does not recognize Israel's right to exist, it has not eschewed or walked away from terrorism and violence, nor has it said it will honor any of the previous agreements that have been made with the Israeli government."

Though the State Department said it advised Carter not to meet with Hamas, Casey said it was open to hearing from him about his talks. "I am sure if he would like to offer any thoughts to us we would certainly be happy to hear them," Casey said.

Carter said Hamas promised it wouldn't undermine Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas' efforts to reach a peace deal with Israel, as long as the Palestinian people approved it in a referendum. In such a scenario, he said Hamas would not oppose a Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza.

Carter said Hamas officials, including Mashaal, agreed to this in a written statement.

"Let me read exactly what they accepted verbatim. This is their language: 'If President Abbas succeeds in negotiating a final status agreement with Israel, Hamas will accept the decision made by the Palestinian people and their will in a referendum monitored by international observers ... even if Hamas is opposed to the agreement,'" Carter said.

But Hamas spokesman Sami Abu Zuhri in Gaza said Hamas' readiness to put a peace deal to a referendum "does not mean that Hamas is going to accept the result of the referendum."

Such a referendum, he said, would have to be voted on by Palestinians living all over the world. They number about 9.3 million, including some 4 million living in the West Bank, Gaza and east Jerusalem.

Israel says Carter's talks embolden Palestinian extremists and hurt Palestinian moderates as they try to make peace with the Jewish state. Abbas, who rules only the West Bank, is in a bitter rivalry with Hamas.

"The problem is not that I met with Hamas in Syria," Carter said Monday. "The problem is that Israel and the United States refuse to meet with someone who must be involved."

Carter said Israeli-Palestinian peacemaking has "regressed" since a U.S.-hosted Mideast conference in November. He faulted Israel for continuing to build on disputed land the Palestinians want for a future state and for its network of roadblocks that severely hamper Palestinians traveling in the West Bank.

"The prison around Gaza has been tightened," he said, referring to Israel's blockade of the territory since the Hamas takeover...

UK Academics Torment Israel

Pro-terror UK academics are considering a boycott of Israeli academic institutions. How about boycotting the Arab-muslim world until it recognizes Israel? I won't hold my breath.
The UK's University and College Union (UCU) will again consider a boycott of Israeli academic institutions, as reported by The Jerusalem Post last month. Last week, the trade union for academics, lecturers, researchers and academic-related staff published the draft motions for next month's conference in Manchester, which will discuss the issue.

Campaigners hoped the union would adhere to a legal ruling last year in which UCU lawyers deemed that a boycott was "unlawful" and "could not be implemented." This led to the decision to consider a boycott of Israeli academia that last year's conference voted in favor of being thrown out. Despite repeated requests, the union has refused to make public the legal advice it received, and the Stop the Boycott campaign has confirmed it will now instruct lawyers to obtain an opinion on the legality of this boycott motion.

"The attitude of the UCU leadership is utterly irresponsible," Stop the Boycott's Jeremy Newmark said. "The president and general secretary have allowed a situation to emerge in which UCU's policy is decided by the Central Committee of the Socialist Workers Party. In the face of its own legal advice, it is shameful that UCU would press ahead with a discredited and discriminatory policy.

"We are now seeking legal advice on this new boycott move, to empower regular UCU members in their attempt to force the union to abandon this destructive course of action," he added.

Three motions relating to Israel will be discussed at the conference, one of which will be presented for the first time by the National Executive Committee (NEC), the union's executive body, as the Post reported last month.

The NEC motion calls on the Histadrut Labor Federation to pay money allegedly owed to the Palestinian General Federation of Trade Unions (PGFTU). According to the details of the motion, the Histadrut has owed the PGFTU €2.5 million since 1995, a number the NEC says represents "Fifty percent of the official organizational dues of Palestinian workers working in Israel," under the terms of the Framework Agreement of March 1995 following the Oslo Accords.

It calls on the Histadrut to pay the money owed and calls for an end to the "siege of Gaza" and for an end to the "occupation of Palestinian and Syrian territory."
Now it's the Golan they are harrassing Israel about. So even if a palestinian state were created, the demands on Israel would not cease. I'm so sick and tired of these hypocritical bastards. Israel does not occupy Syrian territory. Syria started a war with Israel and fired upon Israeli farmers from the Golan Heights. Israel won the territory in a war of self-defense and is not obliged to hand it back to a country which still threatens it and sponsors terror against it. For that matter there is no occupation by Israel of so-called "palestinian" territory. There never existed a sovereign state of Palestine. Why does Israel allow these myths to persist? The whole palestinian cause is all about destroying Israel. These communist, islamo-fascist sympathizers true cause is the annihilation of Israel. They need to be confronted and condemned for the antisemites they are.

Monday, April 21, 2008

Intifada At Berkeley

There was a time when this country had a strong sense pride, self-respect, self-worth and a sense of purpose. In times past we never would have allowed enemies to come here and openly display contempt for us and our values and figuratively and literally spit on our flag or burn it. We have lost our sense of pride and self-worth as a country and culture, and nowadays we let all sorts of riff-raff enter our shores and attend our colleges and universities as well as "teach" at them, and I use that word loosely. Among these dregs of humanity are the Muslim Students Association and the Muslim Student Union . Although they have contempt for American values and freedom, they will exploit our freedom and constitutional rights which they express such contempt for, to get away with their subversive behavior. Yet at the same time act to repress anyone who dares to tell the truth about the evil of islam. The problem is not the ordinary American who still has pride and patriotism, the problem lies with the elite who run important institutions, whether it be in academia, government or the media, who are selling this country out to the enemy, in the name of multiculturalism or for money.

If it wasn't for publications like Frontpage, we would have no idea what was going on on campuses all over the country unless one has children in college. Here's another installment in its series on subversive actions taking place by islamists at colleges and universities across America. This next part deals with the MSA at Berkeley.

The MSA-UCB supports wahhabism. Berkeley faculty member Hamid Algar, is a supporter of the Ayatollah Khomeni and another faculty member Hatem Bazian calls for an "intifada" in America.

When Daniel Pipes came to speak on campus at the behest of the Israel Action Committee, MSA along with Students for Justice in Palestine kept interrupting his speech, calling him "racist" and "Zionist", as though there's something bad about being a Zionist. And since when is islam a "race"? The University police finally ejected the riff-raff from the auditorium. And in another event, the mutant Abdel Malik-Ali condemned "Zionist Jews" and referred to neo-cons as being all Zionist Jews. And in response to a newspaper article about Jewish leaders who feared the Iraq war would unleash an antisemitic backlash, malik-ali said "let the backlash begin". Why are these creatures allowed in my country to spew hatred and incite violence?

The Muslim Students Association of UC Berkeley says that its mission is to support “those who wish to understand, appreciate, and practice their Islam without compromising their morals and beliefs”; to educate non-Muslims “about the misconceptions regarding Islam and the Islamic way of life”; and to “foster a social community for Muslims.36

But MSA-UCB’s interests extend well beyond issues related to education and personal growth. Its constitution explicitly states that one of its chief objectives is to “develop activism of Muslims on campus and in the community.”37 It regards two of Berkeley’s Muslim faculty members – Hamid Algar, who is a supporter of the Ayatollah Khomeni, and Hatem Bazian, who has called for an “Intifada” in America – as role models, and its website makes special mention of both.38

Algar in particular works closely with the organization, and acknowledges its support for Wahhabism, the doctrine of jihad as holy war. In his 2000 publication, Wahhabism: A Critical Essay, he acknowledges MSA’s ties to radical Islam: “Although the MSA progressively diversified its connections with Arab states, official approval of Wahhabism remained strong.”39 Algar further notes that in 1980, MSA UCB published a translation of writings by Ibn Abd al-Wahhab, the 18th century founder of Wahhabism, which went on to become the dominant state sect in Saudi Arabia. And he calls attention to MSA’s role in the creation of the Islamic Society of North America, which Islam scholar Stephen Schwartz describes as “a branch of the Saudi religious militia operating to impose Wahhabi conformity on all of American Islam.”40

MSA-UCB has a history of hostility toward campus speakers who attempt to expose the dangers of radical Islam. For example, the Israel Action Committee and Berkeley Hillel jointly invited Islam scholar Daniel Pipes to address the Berkeley student body on February 10, 2004. On the day of Pipes’ speech to an audience of approximately 700 Berkeley students, some 50 to 70 members of MSA-UCB teamed up with the Berkeley chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine to silence him by interrupting his speech and repeatedly calling him a “racist” and a “Zionist.” University police eventually had to eject the demonstrators from the auditorium.41

In the same month, MSA UCB hosted the sixth annual MSA West Conference. The featured speaker for this event was the notoriously anti-Semitic Abdel Malik-Ali,who angrily denounced “the Zionist Jews” and asserted that “neo-cons are all Zionist Jews.”42 After reading aloud a newspaper article about Jewish leaders who feared that the Iraq War might lead to an anti-Semitic backlash, he said: “Let the backlash begin.”43

During the week of October 22-26, 2007, the David Horowitz Freedom Center held Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week (IFAW) activities at the Berkeley campus in an effort to educate students about the grave threat that radical Islam posed to the world. MSA- UCB organized a competing week of events titled “Peace Not Prejudice Week” that opened with a screening and discussion of the film Ghosts of Abu Ghraib, which depicted American military personnel as barbarians eager to brutalize defenseless Muslims for sport. By showing this film, MSA-UCB conveyed a clear message: The real threat to humanity was not Islamofascism, but America’s egregious disregard for human rights.

One of the featured speakers at Islamo Fascism Awareness Week was Nonie Darwish, the Palestinian-born author of Now they Call Me Infidel; Why I Renounced Jihad for America, Israel and the War on Terror. Darwish, whose father was the head of the fedayeen, the first terrorist group to attack Israel, was raised in a traditional Muslim home in Gaza. She described the degradation of women under Islam, that led her to renounce the faith. MSA-USB members repeatedly interrupted her speech, calling her a “racist” and a “fascist.”44 At some points, the disruption was so loud that Darwish could not speak. Campus police had to remove the unruly protesters from the auditorium.

Once again the question is, since when is islam a "race"? And it is the MSA which has displayed fascist behavior in attempting to forcibly prevent anyone that criticizes islam, from being heard. On the other hand Nonie Darwish is standing up in defense of freedom. This is typical of the islamo-fascists inverting reality.

Sunday, April 20, 2008

Hussein Obama Getting Endorsed By Hamas

Here is hamas' ahmed yousef endorsing hussein obama. One has to wonder why hussein is getting so many endorsements from America's enemies, from farrakhan to hamas, weathermen terrorists, PLO terrorists etc. Only FOX has bothered to cover hamas's endorsement of hussein. Ask yourselves if a man who associates with terrorists and various other enemies of America and belongs to a church who's pastor damns America, has the moral authority to be commander in chief of the United States armed forces and place a wreath around the tomb of the unknown soldier.

Campus Intifada

With the aid of self-hating American radical leftists in academia and many universities unprincipled and greedy eagerness to accept millions of dollars in donations from wahabbi saudi shieks, islamo-nazis hope to destroy America from within. Of course strings come attached with those large saudi donations, which comes in the form of the schools having to bring in large numbers of militant muslim "students", create islamic centers, accommodate islamic demands such as prayer rooms, separation of the sexes, conform with halal deitary laws, having the islamic call to prayer being played on loudspeakers on campus and so forth. Foreign money to American universities should be outlawed.

Here is another installment from Frontpage Magazine's series about the subversive activities of the MSA and MSU at colleges and universities across America. This one deals with the UCLA chapter of the Muslim Students Association. Among the activities the MSA-UCLA has conducted was organizing a protest in front of the Israeli consolate in LA where protesters repeatedly chanted "death to Israel" and "death to Jews". Then the president of the organization Ahmed Shama burned an Israeli flag while the crowd shouted “Khaibar, Khaibar, O Jews, the army of Mohammed is coming for you,” and “Death to Israel, victory to Islam.” Guest speaker at the rally Sohail Shakry called for the elimination of the state of Israel.

At another event sponsored by MSA-UCLA called “Shaping Our Perspective: Our Role in a Changing World”, guest speaker Abdul-Alim Musa called for the United States to be wiped out. And at an event co-sponsored by MSA-UCLA and Students for Justice in Palestine, the low-down, despicable holocaust denier, self-loathing Jew and pro-terrorist norman Finkelstein, was invited to lecture at the event and he said that palestinians suicide bombers weren't terrorists, that the real terrorists were Israeli soldiers who kill Arab terrorists.
The University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) chapter of the Muslim Students Association (MSA) operates both on campus and off – organizing events that feature militant guest speakers, co-sponsoring events and conferences with radical Islamic groups, and co-sponsoring fundraisers on behalf of the same. In addition, the organization uses its publication, Al-Talib, to disseminate its anti-Jewish, anti-American views.

On October 22, 2000 at the Israeli Consulate in Los Angeles, MSA-UCLA members Arif Shaikh and Ahmed Shama (who was then president of the organization) led a demonstration protesting “Israeli aggression” against Palestinians. At this rally, chants of “Death to Israel!” and “Death to Jews!” repeatedly emanated from the crowd. After himself shouting, “Victory to Islam! Death to the Jews!” Shama told the audience, “Our solution is simple. .… Our solution is the establishment of justice by Islamic means. That is the only solution to this Israeli apartheid.”22

Criticizing Israeli/Palestinian peace talks at Camp David, Shama added: “When we see negotiations between Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak, who is a racist Zionist, and on the other side is Yasser Arafat, who used to be a so-called ‘Arab activist,’ but is now a racist Zionist, being mediated by Bill Clinton, who is a racist Zionist. And Hosni Mubarak … the President of Egypt, who is a racist Zionist. And King Hussein II of Jordan, who is a racist Zionist. When we see that a peace process is being negotiated between Zionists, mediated by Zionists, controlled by Zionists, and being portrayed in the media by Zionists, we come and we condemn all of you. ... Because you are racist Zionists. And we will not accept their definition of peace. I will not accept their definition of Islam. We will define Islam the way that the Prophet, peace be upon him, defined it.”23

Shama also burned an Israeli flag while a jubilant crowd chanted “Khaibar, Khaibar, O Jews, the army of Mohammed is coming for you,” and “Death to Israel, victory to Islam.”24

Guest speaker Sohail Shakry, President of MSA West, stepped to the podium and quoted the following words of Hezbollah Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah: “If we look at the situation the past 52 years, the biggest impediment to peace has been the existence of the Zionist State of Israel. Since the existence of this state, we have had wars, conflicts, killings, massacres. If we really want true peace then we must see that it goes with the elimination of the Zionist entity in the middle of the Muslim world.”25

On January 21, 2001, MSA-UCLA sponsored an event titled “Shaping Our Perspective: Our Role in a Changing World.” Guest speaker Abdul-Alim Musa (Imam of Masjid al-Islam in Washington, D.C.) told the crowd: “If you were to say that the Soviet Union was wiped off the face of the earth . . . people would have thought you were crazy, right? The people of Afghanistan didn’t have the intellect or historical knowledge to know that they wasn’t supposed to wipe out the Soviet Union, is that right? . . . We saw the fall of one so-called superpower, Old Uncle Sam is next.”26

In April 2001, MSA-UCLA hosted the MSA West annual conference, which featured guest speaker Imam Muhammad al-Asi, an anti-Semitic Shiite cleric who supports the Iranian regime and the militant Islamic movement in general. Al-Asi’s speech included the following remarks: “Discrimination, if it is against a gentile, is not objectionable; but anything that happens against a Jew becomes a Holocaust…Where is the courageous Jew who can come out and say Israel is as fascist as the most fascist of Europe? Israel is as racist as Apartheid could ever be…. In the meantime, the Zionist-Israeli lobby ... is taking the United States government and the United States people to the abyss. We have a psychosis in the Jewish community that is unable to co-exist equally and brotherly sic with other human beings. You can take a Jew out of the ghetto, but you cannot take the ghetto out of the Jew.”27

In May 2006, MSA UCLA and Students for Justice in Palestine co-sponsored a week of events called “Israel and Palestine: Obstacles to Peace.” They invited the Holocaust-denying, Hezbollah-supporting academic Norman Finkelstein to lecture on this topic. 28 Attacking Israel for its characterization of Palestinian suicide bombers as terrorists, he said the real terrorists were the Israeli soldiers who kill Arab militants.

Iraqi Author Says Jews Have Historic Right to Palestine

Iraqi author Aref 'Alwan writes that Jews have an historic right to Palestine, since their presence preceded the Arab conquest. He says that the islamic historical narrative which is used to justify islamic claims on Jerusalem, Palestine and the Temple Mount, are lies. He also blames the Arab league for refusing to recognize the UN's 1947 partition plan and for starting the war to prevent its implementation. He also says the nakba is rooted in the Arab culture's refusal to recognize the rights of the other. This bigoted, intolerant, chauvinistic attitude extends to Christians, Kurds, Copts, Berbers, Assyrians etc., who's rights have been trampled upon in the Middle East.
The Nakba: A Great Lie

"When the Salafi mob in Gaza tied the hands and feet of a senior Palestinian official and hurled him, alive, from the 14th floor, I asked myself: What political or religious precepts must have been inculcated into the minds of these young people to make them treat a human life with such shocking cruelty?

"Earlier, I had watched on TV as the bodies of two Israeli soldiers were thrown from the second floor [of a building] in a Palestinian city. Whether or not it was the same Salafi mob behind that incident, [one asks oneself]: What language, [or rather,] what historic linguistic distortion could have erased from the human heart [all] moral sensibilities when dealing with a living and helpless human being?

"Arabs who are averse to such inhuman behavior must help me expose and eliminate the enormous lie that has for 60 years justified, extolled, and supported brutality. [Such behavior] is no longer limited to the expression of unconscious [impulses] by individuals, but constitutes a broad cultural phenomenon, which began in Lebanon, [spread to] Iraq and Palestine, and then [spread] - slowly but surely - to other Arab states as well.

"This enormous lie is what the Arabs called the Nakba - that is, the establishment of two states in Palestine: the state of Israel, which the Jews agreed to accept, and the state of Palestine, which the Arabs rejected.

"In our times, when science, with its accurate instruments, can predict climatic changes that will lead to drought or the movement of tectonic plates that causes earthquakes, it is inconceivable that a modern man can, without making a laughingstock of himself, attribute the destruction of cities ancient or modern to the wrath of Allah. Nevertheless, today, 80% of Arabs claim this to be the case. They are neither embarrassed nor afraid of being laughed at.

"This high percentage includes not only the illiterates who densely populate rural areas, villages, and small and large cities, but also students, teachers, lecturers, graduates of institutions of higher education, scientists, technology experts, physicians, graduates of religious universities such as Al-Azhar, historians, and politicians who have held or are currently holding public office.

"It is those numerous educated elites who have forced the Arab mentality into a narrow, restrictive, and deficient cultural mold, spewing violence, terrorism, and zealotry, and prohibiting innovative thought... All this was done to instill a false sense of oppression in the hearts of the Arabs, and to destroy them with the infectious disease of despair and confusion.

"[This attitude] is rooted in the 1947 Arab League resolution stating that Palestine is a 'stolen' land and that none but a Muslim Arab is entitled to benefit from it as an autonomous [political entity], even if another's historic roots there predate those of the Muslims or the Arabs."

The Media Rallies to Obama's Side

Hussein obama's stalinist supporters are hyperventilating over the fact that their boy finally was forced to answer tough questions during Wednesday's debate. As a result, these insane cultists have been heaping scorn upon ABC's Charlie Gibson and George Stephanapolous, calling the station by the thousands, complaining and threatening. As far as these hussein obama cultists are concerned, their candidate should not be treated equally with the other candidates, he deserves preferential treatment. The fragile, prissy, elitist hussein obama and his supporters believe he is entitled to the presidency and should be coddled and given a free pass. Politics is a contact sport, if the punk can't play in the big leagues he should quit. Worst of all is how far the media has their collective tongues up his ass. Gibson and Stephanopolous have been condemned for their performance by other media outlets who are in the tank for obama. It wouldn't occur to these malcontents to blame hussein obama himself for his shoddy performance and his obvious inability to grasp economic and foreign policy. What truly bothers hussein and his supporters in and out of the media, is the fact that finally his lack of knowledge and experience has been exposed and that he was symbolicly castrated before all of America, so they are taking their wrath out on the moderators. They need to face the fact that he is unfit for the presidency. The only reason Hussein obama has come this far is mainly because the media up until recently has been bolstering him, coddling him, covering up his dirty laundry and refraining from asking him any tough questions which would have revealed his lack of knowledge. Hussein needs to be taken down hard and fast.
My, oh my, but weren’t those fellows from ABC News rude to Barack Obama at this week’s presidential debate.

Nothing but petty, process-oriented questions, asked in a prosecutorial tone, about the Democratic front-runner’s personal associations and his electability. Where was the substance? Where was the balance?

Where indeed. Hillary Rodham Clinton and her aides have been complaining for months about imbalance in news coverage. For the most part, the reaction to her from the political-media commentariat has been: Stop whining.

That’s still a good response now that it is Obama partisans — some of whom are showing up in distressingly inappropriate places — who are doing the whining.

The shower of indignation on Charlie Gibson and George Stephanopoulos over the last few days is the clearest evidence yet that the Clintonites are fundamentally correct in their complaint that she has been flying throughout this campaign into a headwind of media favoritism for Obama.

Last fall, when NBC’s Tim Russert hazed Clinton with a bunch of similar questions — a mix of fair and impertinent — he got lots of gripes from Clinton supporters.

But there was nothing like the piling on from journalists rushing to validate the Obama criticisms and denouncing ABC’s performance as journalistically unsound.

The response was itself a warning about a huge challenge for reporters in the 2008 cycle: preserving professional detachment in a race that will likely feature two nominees, Obama and John McCain, who so far have been beneficiaries of media cheerleading.

Saturday, April 19, 2008

Typical Hussein Obama Supporter

Many people are understandably up-in-arms over the remarks of that hideously ugly, misogynist, child-hating degenerate low-life bill maher, for calling the Pope a nazi. These are the kinds of hateful extremists who barack hussein obama attracts. People who hate America and our Christian-Judeo values. They are stalinists, islamo-fascists and their sympathizers. Maher who wouldn't dare put the nazi label on those who are actually nazis such as jeremiah wright, Iran's islamist dictator, hezbollah, hamas, al qaeda etc. Yet he sees fit to affix this label to the Pope. The nazi or fascist label has also been put to neo-cons and Israel by the left, but they won't say this about our enemies. This is how twisted and psychotic the left truly is. The very type of people who hussein obama attracts should give us enough of a reason to vote against him even if we weren't aware of his own radical left and pro-muslim leanings. Let's hope that either Hillary Clinton or John McCain pummels this motherfucker hussein into submission, and takes him down once and for all. He is the most dangerous candidate America has ever had and he must be stopped.

Friday, April 18, 2008

Obama's Identity Crisis

The last thing America needs is a president with psychological problems, one who has an indentity crisis. Because Barack Hussein Obama actually grew up priviledged in Hawaii, raised by his white mother and grandmother, his grandmother having been an affluent bank vice president and Barack having gone to an exclusive prep school, and not having the typical black American experience, he has taken to overcompensating in order to prove he is authentically black to fit in with the Chicago area he represented. He has given to hating the white part of himself and by engaging in black identity politics and ingratiating himself with radical black nationalists beginning from his youth and later by joining TUCC. All of this has helped him get the connections he needed to succeed in Chicago politics, along with, of course playing the game of Chicago gangsterism politics. At one point he dumped a white girlfriend because to marry her would cause him to lose his black identity and wind up being part of mainstream white society. In this book by Shelby Steele A Bound Man, about obama, he explains obama's search for a black indentity, which he has done by denying the white part of himself and hiding his white family from the public. Some excerpt's from Steel's book:
On the one hand, he begins life with so many strikes against a transparent black identity that it is almost inevitable that he would long for one. The absent black father, the mixed-race background, the privileged education, the geographical and cultural remoteness of Hawaii from any large black community—all this makes a kind of identity vacuum out of which one can only yearn. But on the other hand, there is the price he will have to pay for a transparent black identity. There will be parts of himself—family values, beliefs, ambitions, loves—that he will not be able to take with him into the black identity he longs for.

Here is the part about ending the relationship with his white girlfriend:
And so he began to push her away. They fought one night outside a theater after seeing an “angry” black play. She couldn’t understand why “black people were so angry all the time.” In the car afterward she cried, saying she would be black if she could, but she couldn’t. She could only be herself, and wasn’t that enough….He [Obama]confesses that when he thinks of what she said that night, “it somehow makes me ashamed….Little wonder. He rejected her because of her race.

…Obama is…the kind of man who can close down the best part of himself to belong to this black church and this black identity. This is the sort of habit that, over time, can leave a person without much of a self.

Strong convictions seem to be anathema to Barack Obama because he is a bound man. He has fit himself into the world by often taken his own experience out of account. If he takes his actual experience into account, he will lose the black identity—the cultural specificity, the sense of groundedness and belonging—that he has worked so hard to secure. So he simply cannot acknowledge the full truth of his own experience. He is bound against himself.
Hat tip River Daughter