Saturday, May 31, 2008

Hezbollah's U.S. Based Websites Collect Money For Terror

Hezbollah uses U.S. based internet service providers to host its websites, where they solicit funds for terrorist purposes. I thought that the Patriot Act made this kind of thing illegal. Although the ACLU, The Center for Democracy and Technology, as well as the media claims that shutting down these sites would be a violation of free speech, soliciting donations for terrorism and inciting acts of terrorism cannot be considered examples of freedom of speech. The government has the right, in fact the duty to shut down the websites of hezbollah and other terror groups.

We posted on the fact that Hezbollah has several websites hosted by Internet Service Providers here in the US. As this Terrorism Information article illustrates, those English and Arabic Language websites here in the US are used to raise funds for Hezbollah terrorist purposes. This Terrorism-Info article published by the Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center in Israel notes that funds are deposited at designated financial institutions in Lebanon and in Europe. That raises a few questions. Shouldn’t our US Treasury Department and Counterterrorism agencies be closing down these Hezbollah websites to stop the collection of funds for such terrorist activities? We are sure that our colleague Joseph Shahda would urge that. The funds are being used for support of Hezbollah terrorist activities in Lebanon. There is no useful intelligence to be gained from keeping the Hezbollah websites up that are hosted here in the US. That should be something for Senator Lieberman’s Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee to consider in addition to shutting al Qaeda You Tube videos engaging in instructing Jihadis on how to attack us. That is, if the ACLU and others like the New York Times would stop criticizing these internet counter terrorism actions as censorship of ‘free speech’. Note what this critic said:
Center for Democracy and Technology’s lawyer John Morris noting “to say that the ideas…that, for example, some people in this world do not like America, that those ideas are ideas that need to be censored in this country. It is anathema to what this country stands for”.

We disagree with Mr. Morris and the New York Times, Senator Lieberman should urge our Treasury Department to shut down Hezbollah websites hosted here in the US doing fund raising for a US designated terrorist organization.

Another Hateful Obama Spiritual Advisor

A testimonial from Father Pfleger on barack hussein obama's website has recently been scrubbed due to his being exposed as the latest in a long line of cranks, crackpots and hatemongers in hussein obama's nefarious circle of friends. Pfleger is a staunch advocate and supporter of louis farrakhan as well as being a spiritual advisor to hussein obama. Nice group of pals Obama has. That he can have close associations with racists, antisemites, haters of America, marxists etc., and still be a viable presidential candidate is solely due to the fact that he is black. There is no chance that a white politician, having been exposed as having such vile people in his inner circle, would ever be able to continue his career at all, let alone still be a viable presidential candidate. You are the company you keep. And it is my firm belief that barack hussein obama hates white people, hates Jews and hates America. But despite all that, hussein has his apologists in the media willing to give him a free pass at every juncture, no matter what is unearthed about him. And the fact that the democratic party would annoint this punk from Chicago to be their nominee is nothing short of an abomination. The democratic party itself has become an abomination, a disgrace to this country and a danger to our national security. Those hard-working, decent, normal, patriotic Americans who are registered democrats should leave the party en masse since it has become the party of the leftist fringe kooks and no longer a party suitable for ordinary Americans. I am certain the influx of George Soros money has much to do with this. Hat tip Israpundit.

Friday, May 30, 2008

Tutu Meets With Hamas Terror Leader

Morally depraved antisemitic bastard, Bishop Desmond Tutu, met with hamas leader ismail haniya and made a moral equivalence between hamas purposeful targeting of civilians and Israel's inadvertent killing of civilians during defensive military operations because the terrorists use them as human shields.
GAZA CITY (AFP) - Nobel peace laureate Desmond Tutu on Tuesday held talks with a senior Hamas leader in the Gaza Strip where he led a UN fact-finding mission into the killing of 19 Palestinian civilians in an 2006 Israeli artillery attack.

Tutu met Palestinian former prime minister Ismail Haniya, who was dismissed by moderate president Mahmud Abbas last June when Hamas seized control of Gaza from forces loyal to the president.

Sources close to Tutu's delegation said the Anglican former archbishop of Cape Town planned to call during the talks for an end of rocket attacks on Israel, and stress that all attacks against civilians -- whether against Palestinians or against Israelis -- should be condemned.

On Wednesday, the team led by Tutu was due to visit Beit Hanun, where the 2006 killings occurred, to interview witnesses and survivors of the attack.

They will prepare a report to present to the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, UN officials said.

The Israeli raid on Beit Hanun on November 8, 2006, was widely condemned by the international community for killing 19 civilians, including five women and eight children, in their homes.

In February, the Israeli army announced that no charges would be brought against Israeli soldiers over the attack. After conducting an internal investigation, Israel concluded that the bombing of the civilians' homes was "a rare and grave technical error of the artillery radar system."

The army said it had been aiming its artillery at an area from which Palestinian militants were firing rockets at Israel, but due to the technical problem the shells instead hit two homes.

The UN Human Rights Council had decided to send a team to Gaza to investigate the killings in 2006, but Israel refused to grant visas.

Tutu circumvented Israeli restrictions by driving to the Palestinian territory through Egypt on Tuesday.

Why won't he bother to do a fact-finding mission in Sderot?

The Plot to Destroy Israel

I somehow missed this story, revealed by China Confidential last month. That fiendish antisemite Zbignew Brzezinski is preparing an initiative to force Israel into disclosing and dismantling its nuclear arsenal. Now upon reading this, I wonder if Carter's recent disclosure of the number of nuclear weapons in Israel's possession is part of this plan. Brzezinski holds the view that the creation of Israel was a mistake and that the world would have been better off if Israel's birth had been aborted. He is among the myriad of reasons why Obama must be prevented from becoming president, given that he is one of his advisors. One has to consider that there are dark forces behind the candidacy of obama considering how has he been able to come so far in such a short period of time. And the fact that they will stop at nothing to get him to the White House. They need him in there to succeed in their plan to dismantle Israel as well as destroy America as we know it.
White House hopeful Barack Obama's foreign policy adviser, Zbigniew Brzezinski, is preparing a major, new anti-Israel initiative: an international campaign to pressure the Jewish state into disclosing and dismantling its nuclear arsenal as an inducement to Islamist Iran to permanently end its suspect uranium enrichment program.

The campaign will seek to brand democratic Israel as an American North Korea--meaning, a rogue nuclear state--in order to isolate and ultimately defeat and actually destroy the country.

Brzezinski's real goal is the dismantlement of Israel, which he and his demented former boss, the Hamas-supporting former US President, Jimmy Carter, not-so-secretly regard as a "mistake." As Israel approaches its 60th anniversary of modern independence in its historic homeland, Brzezinski, who was Carter's National Security Advisor, has taken to telling associates and acquaintances that the world would have been better off had Israel's birth been aborted. The sentiment is shared by many European politicians and intellectuals, especially left-wingers and Greens, and anti-Semitic ultra-rightists and also, naturally, by Israel-hating neo-Nazis who have aligned themselves with Iran's Holocaust-denying, Hitler-admiring maniac-in-chief, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

Iran is likely to support the Brzezinski plan for propaganda purposes and as a way to play for time while it goes about its business of developing nuclear intercontinental ballistic missiles. The monstrous mullahocracy--which Brzezinski backs--knows that Israel will never agree to a suicidal surrender of its nuclear deterrent. In fact, its importance and value are growing as missile-mad, nuclearizing Iran adds to its stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons.

Although Israel's policy has always been that it will, "Never be the first state to introduce nuclear weapons into the Middle East," the country's nuclear arsenal is estimated at 200 bombs on the low end, and 500-600 nuclear weapons on the upper end.

The Obamas Wickedness

More bile spewing forth from Hussein Obama's church, this time from father Pfleger who was also a campaign contributor to hussein when he ran for the Illinois state senate. This is consistent with the toxic, polarizing and racist nature of hussein obama's campaign. This is an individual who surrounds himself with hateful people all the while running a campaign on "hope and change" and unity. Yet amazingly enough, he gets away with it, with numerous apologists in the media rallying to his defense, apparently seeing no problem with the dichotomy of associating with hatemongers while preaching unity.

Earlier this month Michelle Obama made these astonishing remarks in a speech:
But Mrs. Obama, the star attraction, is taking no chances. Walking onstage to chants of “Yes, we can!” and “Fired up — ready to go!” she quickly gets to the heart of her message: There are forces out there who are trying to take away everything Barack has worked for. They — she doesn’t mention anyone in particular but does refer to one “brand name politician” — are trying to win this election for themselves and thereby deny Obama the opportunity to move America to the mountaintop of hope. And they must be stopped.

“We’ve learned that we’re still living in a time and in a nation where the bar is set, right?” she tells the crowd.

“That’s right.”

“They tell you all you need to do is do these things and you’ll get to the bar — ”


“So you go about the business of doing those things — ”

“Yes — ”

Her husband has been doing just that, Obama explains — raising money, building an organization, winning caucuses, winning primaries, and amassing a large number of delegates. And yet he still hasn’t won, because nothing is ever enough for those unnamed adversaries.

“You start working hard and sacrificing, and you think you’re getting closer to the bar, you’re working and you’re struggling, you get right to that bar, you’re reaching out for the bar, and then what happens?”

“They raise the bar!”

“They raise the bar. Raise the bar. Shift it to the side. Keep it just out of reach.”

So basically this bitch is implying that her husband is entitled to be president by virtue of the fact that he is black and that Hillary or anyone challenging him amounts to denying a black man, obama, what she thinks rightfully belongs to him. The obamas are truly wicked, hateful and divisive people who would tear this country apart to gain power. They have no business ever being in the White House.

Thursday, May 29, 2008

Britain's Nazi Academics

Melanie Phillips reports on the witchhunt against Jews by the Universities and Colleges Union. They are debating on a motion about whether Israeli and Jewish scholars should be singled out for discrimination. The motion not only once again singles out Israel for an academic boycott, but it also requires Israeli and Jewish academics to voice politically correct views about Israel, such as condemning Israel as an oppressive, apartheid state guilty of ethnic cleansing, as a precondition for continued employment. This applies solely to Jews and Israelis. This fascistic motion violates the UCU's own rules against harassment, prejudice and unfair discrimination on the basis of race or nationality. The left have become the modern day nazis. I think it's about time that Jews and non-Jewish supporters of Israel as well as Israel itself, boycotts British academia.
Today, the Universities and Colleges Union is discussing whether universities should single out Israeli and Jewish scholars for active discrimination.

Yes, you read that correctly. The UCU is debating a motion which not only raises the spectre yet again of an academic boycott of Israel but demands of Jewish and Israeli academics that they explain their politics as a pre-condition to normal academic contact. The motion asks colleagues

to consider the moral and political implications of educational links with Israeli institutions, and to discuss the occupation with individuals and institutions concerned, including Israeli colleagues with whom they are collaborating... the testimonies will be used to promote a wide discussion by colleagues of the appropriateness of continued educational links with Israeli academic institutions... Ariel College, an explicitly colonising institution in the West Bank, be investigated under the formal Greylisting Procedure.

The implication is that, if they don’t condemn Israel for the ‘occupation’, or practising ‘apartheid’, ‘genocide’ or any of the other manufactured crimes laid at Israel’s door by the Palestinian/Islamist/neonazi/leftwing axis, they won’t be able to work. Their continued employment will depend on their holding views which are permitted. The views they are being bludgeoned into expressing as a condition of their employment are based on lies, distortion, propaganda, gross historical ignorance, blood libels and prejudice. And this in the universities, supposedly the custodians of free thought and inquiry in the service of dispassionate scholarship.

What makes it all the more appalling is that it is Israelis and Jews alone who are being singled out for this treatment. No other group is to be barred from academic activity unless they hold ‘approved’ views; no state-run educational institution controlled by any of the world’s numerous tyrannies is to be ‘grey-listed’. The UCU’s own rules state that it

actively opposes all forms of harassment, prejudice and unfair discrimination.

Well, various Jewish groups in the Stop the Boycott campaign have obtained a legal opinion from two QCs which states that today’s motion constitutes harassment, prejudice and unfair discrimination on grounds of race or nationality. It says:

If the Motion is passed it would expose Jewish members of the Union to indirect discrimination... Additionally, the Union faces potential liability for acts of harassment on grounds of race or nationality. The substance of the Motion may also involve the Union in becoming accessories to acts of discrimination in an employment context against Israeli academics...No doubt, if such Israeli academics speak in favour of the Palestinian viewpoint they will be immune from further action; if they are against it or possibly even non-committal they and their institutions are to be considered potentially unsuitable subjects for continued association...

The Union will accordingly be adopting a provision, criterion or practice which will put Jewish members at a particular disadvantage compared to non-Jewish members. That is because Jewish members are much more likely to have links with Israeli academics and institutions than non -Jewish members. To require Jewish members to act consistently with the Motion (if passed) would be to impose a professional detriment upon them as Union members which is based on their race. If they acted inconsistently with the Motion, we infer that they would also be subject to disadvantage or sanction under the Union rules or practices -- an alternative detriment. We do not see how any such detriment would be justified as pursuing a legitimate aim. No proper Union purpose is promoted by imposing this detriment on certain members. Thus the Motion will have the effect of indirectly -- and unlawfully -- against Jewish Members of the Union.

The opinion is thus unequivocal. Today’s motion breaks the law; it breaks the UCU’s own rules; it is prejudiced, discriminatory and unjust towards Israelis and Jews. But the motion also notes

legal attempts to prevent UCU debating boycott of Israeli academic institutions; and legal advice that such debates are lawful

In other words, two fingers to the Jews. Such is the disgusting and terrifying state to which Britain’s intelligentsia has now descended.

Aussies Take a Stand Against Islamization

In the town of Camden In New South Whales, Australia, the residents there are saying no to the building of an islamic school. Between this and what occured in Verona, Italy, there does seem to be the beginnings of a backlash against islamization in the west. Ordinary citizens should reject the multiculturalism, dhimmitude, creeping sharia, the building of madrassahs and mosques being forced upon us in our communities by our feckless elites who have chosen surrender, appeasement and submission to islam. It will take ordinary citizens to put a stop to this destruction of our values and culture.
With its lace curtain bungalows and steepled Anglican church, the once tranquil town of Camden in New South Wales seems the most improbable of settings for a row that combines race and religion.

Proud of its rich history, the town promotes itself as "the birthplace of the nation's wealth", for it was here, in the early 19th Century, that the sheep and dairy industries first began to flourish.

Now the town, which lies on south-west fringes of Sydney, is confronting a very 21st Century issue: the proposal to construct an Islamic school for some 1,200 Muslim pupils.

Behind the proposal is the Sydney-based Quranic Society, which has purchased 15 acres of land on the fringes of town, and produced detailed plans and designs.

None of them reference any obvious Islamic influences. Functional and non-descript, the two-storey school could easily be a light industrial development.

Camden council is currently deciding whether to grant planning permission and allow the controversial development to go ahead.

'Wrecking Australia'

At the council's headquarters, 12 bulging ring-binders hold more than 3,200 submissions from the public. Only 100 are in favour of the development.

The council will deliver its verdict either later this month or early next.

Twice the town has managed to rebuff the fast food giant McDonald's. Now it has mobilised to block the construction of the Islamic school.

Back in November, more than 1,000 local people took part in a public meeting. Many participants expressed themselves with little regard for political correctness.

"This has to be one of the nicest places in New South Wales," said one woman, who has lived in Camden for the past nine years.

"Everywhere is being destroyed. Why don't we tell the truth. They're wrecking Australia. They're taking us over," she said.

"Why hasn't anyone got any guts? They've got terrorists amongst 'em... They want to be here so they can go and hide in all the farm houses... This town has every nationality... but Muslims do not fit in this town. We are Aussies, OK."

Some of the loudest cheers of the night greeted a speech from a local man in his late 70s.

"Can I just say this without being racist or political?" he said. "In 1983, in the streets of London a parade by Muslims chanted incessantly 'If we can take London, we can take the world'. Don't let them take Camden."

Wednesday, May 28, 2008

Iraqi Teens Forced to Become Suicide Bombers

Al qaeda in Iraq, otherwise known as Michael Moore's "minutemen", have been forcing teenage boys to train as suicide bombers against their will. The jihadists threatened to kill their families, rape their mothers and sisters, kill their fathers and destroy their houses if they did not comply.
...The boys were rounded up as part of the Mother of Two Springs operation targeting al Qaeda in Iraq in Mosul and Nineveh province. The offensive has netted the detentions of more than 1,300 suspects.

The teens had been trained in recent weeks, Khalaf said.

A Saudi national -- a suspected al Qaeda in Iraq operative -- had been one of their trainers, but he was believed to have died in a military operation, Khalaf said. It is not known where or when he was killed.

The group of teens included the son of a female physician, the son of a college professor and four youths who belonged to families of poor vendors.

All six boys were taught how to carry out suicide attacks with explosive belts and a date was fixed for each one of them, Hussein said, adding that Iraqi soldiers had questioned the boys.

Iraqi troops rounded up the teens on the same day a suicide bomber drove a motorcycle into a checkpoint manned by police and a U.S.-backed Iraqi security group in northern Iraq, killing six people and wounding 22 others, local police said.

The suicide blast occurred Monday in the Salaheddin provincial city of Tarmiya.

The bomber, carrying a Saudi Arabian identification card, attacked a checkpoint guarded by police and members of the Sons of Iraq, the American-backed citizens' group that opposes al Qaeda in Iraq, police in Tikrit said.

Police said the Saudi ID card contained the name of Sultan bin-Mohammed al-Ghamedih, 35.

The checkpoint is near the house of a local leader of the citizens' group. The dead and wounded included police, civilians and Sons of Iraq members, police said.

Sons of Iraq, or Awakening Council, groups have been targeted by al Qaeda in Iraq.

Also in Salaheddin province Monday, a U.S. soldier was killed and two others wounded when a roadside bomb exploded, according to the U.S. military. Watch how a military unit is honoring its fallen »

The U.S. military said Monday that another soldier was killed in a bombing Sunday near Ash Shamiya in southern Iraq's Qadisiya province.

An American soldier also died Saturday from a "noncombat-related cause." The number of U.S. service members killed in the Iraq war stands at 4,083...

Brzezinski Accuses Jews of McCarthyism

Zbigniew Brzezinski, advisor to Hussein Obama, has accused American Jews of engaging in McCarthyism for daring to call him what he is, an antisemite, due to his one-sided, vehemently anti-Israel views and being an apologist for her terrorist enemies.
A foreign policy adviser of presidential candidate Barack Obama, Zbigniew Brzezinski, accused members of the American Jewish establishment of "McCarthyism" in its attitude towards critics of Israel. He called the pro-Israel lobby "too powerful" and accused American supporters of Israel as being too ready to use the slur of "anti-Semitism" against critics of Israel.

He also misrepresented the facts, stating that AIPAC, the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee has "consistently opposed a two-state solution and a lot of members of Congress have been intimidated and I don't think that is healthy". In fact, AIPAC does indeed support a two state solution. Congressmen Artur Davis (a Democrat) and Eric Cantor ( a Republican) are just two critics who have refuted the allegation that Congress is intimidated or pressured by the "Israel Lobby" . He offered further criticism

It's not unique to the Jewish community -- but there is a McCarthy-ite tendency among some people in the Jewish community. They operate not by arguing but by slandering, vilifying, demonising.

They very promptly wheel out anti-Semitism. There is an element of paranoia in this inclination to view any serious attempt at a compromised peace as somehow directed against Israel."...

Brzezinski and the entire band of Carter administration scoundrels
are largely responsible for the problems in the Middle East today
because they facilitated the islamic revolution and the rise of the
ayatollahs in Iran. Yet these fiends continually dispense advice on
Mideast policy. As far as calling them antisemites, if it quacks like
a duck...

Why doesn't Zbigniew Brzezinski crawl back under the rock from which he came. He should have stayed hidden, he had a leading role in the disasterous consequences of the Carter years with regard to foreign policy. Brzezinski and the entire Carter administration should be left to the dustbin of history, yet he has the audacity to arrogantly lecture about the Middle East and how to deal with it, despite his dismal track record. And nobody calls him on this. He should be told to shut the fuck up, you are the last person who should be dispensing advise to anyone on the Mideast considering the mess you left us with. Three decades later, we as a nation are still reeling from the cataclysmic effects of the Carter administration's Iran policy of betraying our ally the Shah and facilitating the takeover of the country by the ayatollah khomeini and those band of crazed mullahs. I hate him and everything he stands for. He will never admit the damage he has done. But instead, through hussein obama, he and Carter are are hoping for a second chance to help their islamist friends and damage Israel.

Between Brzezinski and other anti-Israel advisors such as Robert Malley, Samantha Powers, Merrill McPeak, and with antisemitic friends such as Rashid Khalidi and Jeremiah Wright, what will it take for Jewish voters to understand Hussein Obama is not their friend and reject this malcontent for president?

Tuesday, May 27, 2008

Cluelessness On Iran

More tripe about the best way to appease Iran from Hussein Obama advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski along with William Odom.

Current U.S. policy toward the regime in Tehran will almost certainly result in an Iran with nuclear weapons. The seemingly clever combination of the use of "sticks" and "carrots," including the frequent official hints of an American military option "remaining on the table," simply intensifies Iran's desire to have its own nuclear arsenal. Alas, such a heavy-handed "sticks" and "carrots" policy may work with donkeys but not with serious countries. The United States would have a better chance of success if the White House abandoned its threats of military action and its calls for regime change.

Consider countries that could have quickly become nuclear weapon states had they been treated similarly. Brazil, Argentina and South Africa had nuclear weapons programs but gave them up, each for different reasons.

Why is this imbecile comparing these nations with the totalitarian mullahcratic regime in Tehran as though the same approach that succeeded in preventing these nations from going nuclear will work with an islamist Iran? Furthermore Brazil, Argentina and South Africa even if they had nuclear weapons would not present a threat to the world. None of those nations have vowed to wipe any other country off the map.

...An additional longer-range benefit of such a dramatically different diplomatic approach is that it could help bring Iran back into its traditional role of strategic cooperation with the United States in stabilizing the Gulf region. Eventually, Iran could even return to its long-standing and geopolitically natural pre-1979 policy of cooperative relations with Israel...

Cooperative relations between Israel and Iran existed because Iran was not ruled by islamists prior to ‘79. Those that rule Iran today are not interested in cooperating and coexisting with Israel, they want to destroy Israel. Islamists reject the concept of a Jewish state in the dar al islam. Hashemi Rafsanjani has said he believes Iran could launch a first strike on Israel because it would only damage the muslim world, but would annihilate Israel. Why does Brzezinski ignore the islamic ideology which drives the regime's hatred for Israel and its desire to acquire nuclear weapons?

People like brzezinski are hopelessly clueless. Why do people from the failed Carter administration, including Carter himself, dispense advice on the Middle East when their own policies have yielded disasterous results? These were the people who facilitated the rise of the islamic revolution in Iran which is at the root cause of all of the problems in the region today. Why should anyone listen to brzezinski? Hat tip Israpundit.

Jordanian University Lecturer: Nuke Israel

Jordanian University lecturer Ibrahim Alloush advocates a nuclear jihad against Israel on Al Jazeera TV. He suggests sending suicide bombers into Israel carrying small nuclear weapons. Such lovely, peace-loving neighbors Israel has to live amongst. And Jordan is supposed to be one of those "moderate" Arab countries, one which Israel has a peace treaty with.
Dr. Ibrahim 'Alloush: Whoever managed to get a martyrdom-seeker into Dimona armed with conventional explosives should consider how to get martyrdom-seekers into Dimona and elsewhere armed with non-conventional explosives and perhaps even small nuclear bombs. We should think in this direction.

Carter's Latest Treachery

While at the Hay-on-Wye literary festival in England on Sunday, Jimmy Carter, when discussing Iran, revealed the number of nuclear weapons Israel possesses. Carter has become one of Israel's foremost antagonists in the west, and that's saying alot. But his treachery is worse, being he is an ex-president of the U.S.

Also, in an interview with The Guardian, Carter called the embargo of Gaza, "one of the greatest human rights crimes on Earth". Really? Is it a greater human rights crime than launching rockets at Israeli children? Or the genocide in Sudan? Or how about "honor" killings, genital mutilation, stonings and floggings of women in the muslim world? Or beheadings, executions of homosexuals, the persecution of Christians and other non-muslims in islamic countries? I could go on, but you get the picture. Carter also said "There is no reason to treat these people this way,". How about the incessant rocket attacks on Sderot? Is that a good enough reason, or does Carter believe the lives of Israelis are expendable? Carter is on the payroll of wealthy Arab sheiks and he is an antisemite. One has to wonder why a former president who's Mideast policy was an abysmal failure continually dispenses advice about how to deal with the Middle East. It is largely Carter who is responsible for the region's problems as a result of his administration facilitating the rise of Iran's islamic revolution.
One month after his visit to the region spurred criticism from Israeli officials for his meeting with Syria-based Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal, former US president Jimmy Carter is again making waves, this time saying that Israel possesses 150 nuclear weapons.

The London Times said Carter made the comment Sunday while at the Hay-on-Wye literary festival in England. He was discussing Iran, and the difficulty it would have in building a secret nuclear arsenal, when he mentioned the Israeli weapons, the paper said.

In a report published on Monday, Carter was quoted as saying that the international community should conduct direct dialogue with Iran in order to persuade the country to drop its nuclear ambitions.

It was unclear from the newspaper's account whether Carter was citing those estimates, offering his own independent assessment or drawing on US intelligence he would have had access to as president.

Although it is widely speculated that Israel indeed has nuclear weapons, no Israeli government has ever admitted to such.

Former Military Intelligence chief Maj.-Gen. (ret.) Aharon Ze'evi Farkash downplayed Carter's comments on Tuesday, but warned that they could potentially be used by Iran to push its nuclear development.

"[Carter] is not the first and he won't be the last to talk about this," Farkash said during an interview with Israel Radio. "I think the dialogue about Israel on this subject is known, and I wouldn't want to expand on this; as it is, it would seem that in [Carter's] latest visit to the region, he was so hurt [by the political establishment shunning him] that he saw fit to say things which I think weren't that responsible.

"He was a president a long time ago, and these kinds of things could do damage, but on the other hand, it could enhance the deterrent," Farkash continued, but added that with regard to the current international effort to stop Iran's nuclear ambitions, "they, the enemy, or some of our 'less good' friends, could use these claims against us."

Meanwhile, in an interview with The Guardian, Carter called on members of the European Union to break the embargo of the Gaza Strip, which he called "one of the greatest human rights crimes on Earth."

"Most families in Gaza are eating only one meal per day. To see Europeans going along with this is embarrassing," he said.

Carter called the ban on talking to Hamas "unrealistic" and cited Israeli cease-fire negotiations with Hamas - via Egyptian mediator Omar Suleiman - as reason enough for the Europeans to reexamine their stance.

Irrational Jew-Hatred Trumps the Lives of Sick Iraqi Children

Iraqi mothers of children with congenital heart conditions are refusing free life-saving treatment in Israel because they have been indoctrinated with a steady diet of hatred their entire lives. If people, especially leftists, want to know why there cannot be peace in the Middle East, this story sums it up. Because, as Golda Meir said many years ago,and which still holds true today, the Arabs hate the Jews more than they love their own children. How sad that these poor children must suffer and possibly die because of the irrational hatred their parents and culture have of Israel. It’s also interesting that while Israel provides them with free care, the Arab countries charge them exorbitant amounts of money to treat these desperately needy children with life-saving surgery in the very few Arab countries that actually can provide the treatment. Israelis care more about Arab children then their own people do. This is the fundamental difference between Israel’s humanitarian and compassionate culture, compared to the Arab-muslims wicked culture. But there are those mostly on the political left who are unwavering in their belief that Israel is to blame for all of the region’s troubles despite all evidence to the contrary.

The parents of Iraqi babies with congenital heart problems are facing a dilemma: should they allow their children to be treated in Israeli hospitals when they have been brought up to believe that Israel is their mortal enemy?

Hostility towards the Jewish state in Iraq is so strong that many parents refuse to travel to Tel Aviv for free life-saving hole-in-the-heart surgery.

Some accept the offer but never reveal where their children were treated, even though the operation has not been available in Iraq since its leading cardiac clinic burnt down after the American-led invasion in 2003.

Other parents are seeking treatment elsewhere in the Arab world, despite prices of up to £15,000 for heart surgery in private clinics. They fear the stigma of being treated in Israel.

Aria, an 18-month-old baby from Kirkuk in northern Iraq, was waiting to return home last week after a successful operation at the Edith Wolfson medical centre in Tel Aviv, where 11 Iraqi children are being treated. The surgery is sponsored by Save a Child’s Heart (SACH), a humanitarian organisation founded in Israel in 1996 and supported by private sources, including Christian charity groups.

Aria’s young mother, Paiman, paid tribute to the clinic and the surgeon, Dr Lior Sasson, saying: “He saved little Aria’s life.”

However, the parents of other Iraqi children in urgent need of surgery said they had rejected free treatment when they heard it would be performed in Israel.

Sara, 2, needs surgery for a defective heart valve. After taking her from Iraq to neighbouring Jordan for preliminary tests, her mother, Shatha, 37, turned down treatment at the Wolfson centre. She said she had had no idea before she left for Amman, the Jordanian capital, that the operation would be in Israel.

“We’ve been foes of Israel since before we were born. We firmly believe that they are our enemies. You can’t change this overnight,” she said.

She is now planning to have the operation performed in Algeria instead: its government agreed to pay for 14 Iraqi children to be treated there rather than be sent to Israel.

Shatha’s friend, an Iraqi Kurd from Kirkuk who was too afraid to give her first name, also travelled to Jordan so that her son, Ahmed, could be assessed for a heart operation. She too turned down the free treatment offered by SACH.

“Now I can sleep with a clear conscience. I’m able to hold my head up high and not be ashamed by having my son treated in Algeria,” she said.

The opposite view was taken by Mohammed, a 37-year-old Kurdish aid worker, whose daughter Souz, 22 months, needed urgent heart surgery. He borrowed thousands of dollars to pay for treatment in Iraq and Jordan, but the doctors there told him there was nothing they could do for her. When he heard she could be treated in Israel, he did not hesitate. She has now had surgery and is making a good recovery.

“I can honestly tell you that I didn’t worry for a moment about where or who will operate on my daughter,” he said. “Nor did I worry about the reaction of my family and relatives. Anyone who blames me should put themselves in my place and live for nearly two years watching his daughter die in front of his eyes, and then tell me what he’d have done.”

His wife, who accompanied Souz to Israel for the operation, added: “The doctors were helpful and understanding, and were sympathetic to our suffering.” She had not been charged anything and would be able to return home with the £1,000 given to her by her husband.

Apprehension about a hostile reaction in Iraq is common among families who opted for treatment in Israel.

The mother of Mustafa, 4, from Kirkuk, who has undergone two heart operations in six months, said: “My only fear, which spoils my joy at my son’s escape from death, is the revenge my family can expect when we go back to Iraq.”

Simon Fisher, the Liverpool-born executive director of SACH, said: “We welcome every child in need regardless of origin.”

Monday, May 26, 2008

Memorial Day

Muslim Campus Group Screened Pro-Terror Film

A bit of takkiya was put into practice by the UC Irvine Muslim Student Union along with CAIR last month. The groups were to co-sponsor a fund raiser and private screening of a pro-terrorist propaganda film called USA Versus Sami Al Arian at two Orange County California movie theaters. The film accuses the US government of false imprisonment of Al-Arian, a former professor at the University of South Florida and convicted terrorist. The film essentially depicts him as a political prisoner jailed for dissent and exercising his civil rights. Al-Arian however, was head of the American wing of palestinian islamic jihad and held fundraisers for hamas and advocated the murder of Jews. Two women members of the muslim community reserved the venue and mislead the theater owners by telling them they were going to screen a "college student film". Once this event became known to the wider public, calls and e-mails came in to Starplex Cinemas corporate offices and they subsequently cancelled the event. Unfortunately however, CAIR moved the screening and fundraiser to Regal Cinemas, which chose to go ahead with the event despite scores of protest calls and e-mails. But the good news is that because of short notice the fundraiser was an abysmal failure with only a couple of dozen regulars from the muslim community showing up. The lesson here is that citizens must be vigilant and take a proactive role in resisting islamic jihad. When we actually stand up to them, we get positive results.
The Muslim Student Association (MSA) maintains more than 150 chapters at colleges across the country, fronting as a cultural and religious organization. Realistically, however, the MSA is a radical political group that was initially founded by members of the Muslim Brotherhood, the godfather of al-Qaeda and Hamas. The purpose of the MSA is to promote jihad in institutions of higher learning.

At the University of California- Irvine (UCI), the Muslim Student Union (MSU) is also a part of the Muslim Student Association and has openly supported terrorist groups. Presently the MSU aims to "build an environment that enhances good, discourages bad, and provides networks of resources, knowledge, people, and companionship to its members." The MSU offers "daily congregational prayers, daily free iftars … over eight weekly classes, a quarterly magazine Alkalima, coalition building with other clubs on campus, and a gateway to the larger Muslim community …" MSU also provides career advice and a study program to help Muslims at UCI.

Yet underneath this innocuous description it also becomes apparent that this organization preserves a seething hatred of Jews, Israel, and America. MSU activities constantly reveal support for violence, anti-Americanism and anti-Semitism. MSU members have made their positions clear: they support Hamas, they support "freedom fighting" and they have publicly declared that Zionists have no future and Israel will soon be wiped off the map. Members of this organization commonly wear green armbands to signal their allegiance to the terrorist group Hamas.

Earlier this month, a student coalition led a boycott against two Orange County, CA, movie theaters for their decision to hold a private screening and fund-raiser co-sponsored by CAIR (Council of American-Islamic Relations) and the UC Irvine Muslim Student Union. The featured film was the USA Versus Sami Al-Arian: (1) a hagiographic screening on the self-starved convicted terrorist. An indictment against the United States government on the egregious charge of false imprisonment, the film compares the Palestinian Islamic Jihad collaborator to a Socratic like figure jailed for his patriotic dissent and practice of his fundamental civil rights.

The evidence against Al-Arian was damning, alleging that Al-Arian, a former professor at the University of South Florida, was the head of the American wing of Palestinian Islamic Jihad. The indictment against Al-Arian suggests that Al-Arian abused his position as a university professor to bring other members of his terrorist group into the United States "under the guise of academic conferences and meetings." (2)

Al-Arian purportedly also helped Palestinian Islamic Jihad members "receive cover as teachers or students" at USF and worked to further alliances with other groups like Hamas and Hezbollah.

Sunday, May 25, 2008

Obama's Thuggish Brown Shirt tactics

Hussein Obama has made his career by mowing down his opponents starting with having all of them removed from the Illinois state senate race and then playing dirty tricks against his opponent for the U.S. senate race when his campaign arranged to have the man's confidential divorce records publicly released after hussein was trailing him in the polls and on his way to losing. Then the GOP put up a weak candidate in Alan Keys against him.

Then there has been the abject misogyni and race-baiting against Hillary employed by hussein and the treacherous, evil david axelrod. And of course discounting voters in two states. This guy has yet to win an election legitimitely. God knows what these cretins have in store for John McCain despite the fact that he is a military hero and very experienced and therefore should be a shoe-in for the presidency when matched against this lightweight hussein. They will probably use ageism. Whenever he makes any gaffes, which inevitably we all do, watch for axelrod and his band of malcontents portray it as a sign of senility or something like that.

You see hussein obama is someone who gets ahead by tearing down his opponents because he has no credentials and qualifications to speak of. He obviously cannot convince voters to choose him on his own merits, so the strategy is to tear down his opponents in the most brutal manner.

I truly believe there are dark and sinister anti-American forces behind hussein obama's candidacy. There is a reason he has come so far, so fast. If one were to investigate, I'm positive you would find Arab money behind it, saudi sheiks and islamic terror groups.

A Rare Voice of Sanity From Hollywood

An interview with Jon Voight who visited Sderot to show solidarity with Israelis and to bring attention to their plight of regularly being bombarded with rockets. Its a breath of fresh air to hear someone in hollywood express unequivocal support for Israel. He simply states the blunt truth that surrendering Gaza was a mistake and that Israel's enemies don't want peace they want to destroy Israel and kill Jews. Obviously an avowed Christian he quotes the bible saying "those who bless Israel will be blessed and those who curse it will be cursed", and points out that throughout history that indeed has happened, those who persecuted the Jews met their eventual demise. He also points out how the terrorists deliberately target Israeli civilians with rockets and shoots them from within its own civilian populations so that when Israel acts in its own defense they can use the deaths of civilians for propaganda purposes. This is the kind of truth you don't often hear from Hollywood people. It is refreshing to hear him call out evil for what it is rather than make excuses and justifications for terrorists targeting Israel or make absurd moral equivalencies between the terrorists and Israeli defensive military measures, the typical "cycle of violence" pap. He also warns against withdrawing from Iraq which he says would result in a slaughter. And he actually says there is evil afoot in the world, much to the shock of Hollywood leftists I'm sure, who believe muslims hate us because of things we have supposedly done to them. It would never occur to that crowd that there could actually be something morally wrong with islam. That wouldn't be politically correct or culturally sensitive. Jon Voight explains his political shift to the right happened as the result of the horrors which occured after the Vietnam war when the communists committed mass slaughter. He also came to realize the anti-war movement had been and is still, I might add, controlled and manipulated by communists.

Obama's Communist Mentors

Evidence continues to mount proving Barack Hussein Obama is a danger to national security and should never be president. Obama was mentored in Hawaii and Chicago by Frank Marshall Davis, an African American poet and journalist who was a member of the Moscow controlled Communist party USA. This is according to two new reports released by investigative journalists Cliff Kincaid and Herbert Romerstein. A real life manchurian candidate molded by sinister anti-American forces in order for them to take control of the country.
Barack Obama had extensive ties with extreme anti-American elements, including agents of the Moscow-controlled Communist Party USA, in Hawaii and Chicago, according to two new reports released yesterday in Washington, D.C., by two experienced internal security investigators.

Investigative journalist Cliff Kincaid and Herbert Romerstein, a former investigator with the U.S. House Committee on Un-American Activities, presented evidence Obama was mentored, while attending high school in Hawaii, by Frank Marshall Davis, an African-American poet and journalist who was also a CPUSA member.

The authors, in a separate report, document Obama's ties to radicals in Chicago who helped launch his career.

In a paper entitled "Communism in Hawaii and the Obama Connection," the authors document that in 1948, Davis decided to move from Chicago to Honolulu at the suggestion of what they describe as two "secret CPUSA members," actor Paul Robeson and Harry Bridges, the head of the International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen Union, or ILWU.

In Chicago, Davis had worked for the Chicago Star newspaper; in Honolulu, he was hired as a reporter for the Honolulu Record, both identified by Kincaid and Romerstein as "communist front newspapers."

In his autobiography, "Dreams from My Father," Obama discusses the influence a mentor identified in the book only as "Frank" had on his intellectual development.

Obama described Frank as a drinking companion of his grandfather, who had boasted of his association with African-American authors Richard Wright and Langston Hughes during the time Frank was a journalist in Chicago...

Here is the second report entitled "Communism in Chicago and the Obama Connection", documents Hussein Obama's ties to radical leftists and terrorists in Chicago. The Students for a Democratic Society which Obama friends Ayers and Dohrn belonged to, received financial contributions from CPUSA, which in turn was being financed by the Soviet Union.
..."There has been no explanation of why Ayers et al. played a role in launching Obama's political career," Kincaid wrote.

Kincaid and Romerstein present documentation that Tom Hayden, another major figure in the SDS, is today one of four principal initiators of the "Progressives for Obama" movement, which calls for ending the war in Iraq "as quickly as possible, not in five years."

According to Kincaid and Romerstein, U.S. Peace Council executive committee member Frank Chapman "blew the whistle on communist support for Obama's presidential bid and his real agenda" in a letter to the People's Weekly World after Obama's win in the Iowa Democratic Party caucuses.

"Obama's victory was more than a progressive move; it was a dialectical leap ushering in a qualitatively new era of struggle," Chapman wrote. "Marx once compared revolutionary struggle with the work of the mole, who sometimes burrows so far beneath the ground that he leaves no trace of his movement on the surface.

Kincaid and Romerstein wrote, "The clear implication of Chapman's letter is that Obama himself, or some of his Marxist supporters, are acting like moles in the political process. The suggestion is that something is being hidden from the public."

Saturday, May 24, 2008

Another Pro-Terrorist Friend of Obama

While in Michigan Hussein Obama had a private meeting with the head of the Islamic Center of America, Imam Hassan Qazwini who is a sympathizer of Iran and hezbollah. He and hussein obama discussed such issues as the Arab-Israel conflict, the Iraq war and the status of muslims in the west. The Islamic Center of America regularly plays host to leading Iranian islamist clerics and Qazwini is close friends with hezbollah's "spiritual" leader. Qazwini has said he wants America to become a predominently islamic country and would like to see muslims infiltrate public life in America. He has also called Israel a terrorist state. As a guest speaker at Qazwini's mosque, Farrakhan spewed hatred and violence to an audience of 1000 wildly cheering Arab muslims. He preached how the U.S. government was occupied by evil forces and people in positions of power have a satanic mentality and incited the crowd to carry out holy war. I don't know what further proof is needed to make it clear that Barack Hussein Obama represents and is sympathetic to America's islamist enemies and presents a national security threat. How many communists, islamists and terrorists have so far been linked to hussein obama? What more will it take to convince Americans that he is not one of us, that what he represents is inimical to American values and is outright evil and dangerous to the security and survival of America as we know it? He made it very clear that he is not one of us when he said in his book that if the political winds shift in an ugly direction he will stand with the muslims. How is it possible that this treacherous man is still in this race? He remains in the race because the media refuses to cover the truth about him. They do not care about this country. As far as I'm concerned, the media itself is an enemy of America. It is horrible enough that we have this fifth column of jihadists operating freely, but now there's a chance one of their own can be placed in the White House. Make no mistake, barack hussein obama shares the views of farrakhan and the nation of islam. There is no chance that the pro-obama whores in the msm will take this story mainstream.
...As with almost all practicing Muslims, Imam Qazwini’s pride in being American is unrelated to his religion. Qazwini didn’t like the Mohammedan Caricatures in Denmark, considers criticism of Islam by the West an act of bigotry and Racism, and has participated in prominent lawsuits against incidents he has deemed Islamophobic. He once observed in an interview in which he claimed equivalence between Pat Robertson’s retracted statement calling for Hugo Chavez’s death, and Islamic death Fatwas:

I would love to see America become a predominantly Muslim country, but that’s not realistic…. I would like to see Muslims infiltrating the public life of America as Jews did. [source]

America a Muslim Country? Jews Infiltrating America?! Obama obviously knows how to chose his friends!

Every chance he is given, Qazwini is either railing against basic Western Values like freedom of speech, or is playing the Islamophobia card. That his Islamic Center was built with money from Dubai’s billionaire Sheikhs, is probably irrelevant. It is his intellectual acumen which is the heart of the problem.

In a recent debate in Doha Qatar, Qazniwi made it clear that he blindly believes there is no conflict in Iraq between Shia and Sunni, and that such a conflict could not be responsible for the impression that Islam was a violent religion. This is contrary to self-evident fact, but for Qazwini, negating facts is just part of his routine.

Recently Qazwini went on record that Islam has always been progressive on women’s issues as it has promoted political equality. Considering his own contributions in Detroit, to inequality between men and women….equally disingenuously Qazwini regularly maintains that no mainstream Islamic clerics support Terrorism, and emphasizes that mainstream Islam does not recognize a term such as “apostasy”! Even wikipedia, the cesspit of misinformation - spearheaded by nationalist revisionists of all colors and origin, but especially from Islam (closely followed by Hindu nationalists)– disagrees with Qazwini on that one

Either Qazwini spent his years in Iranian madrasahs sleeping - in which case his credentials to run America’s Mega-mosque are in question- or he thinks Americans are so stupid, that he can play games with us and insult our intelligence with impunity.

Qazwini is just too small fry to tell us, that Muslim Clerics all roundly denounce terrorism, when none other than the Grand Mufti of Egypt, has been consistent in going to excruciating details about why terrorism is a must, a necessity, and a good deed.

In his new book “American Crescent” Qazwini portrays America as a Racist country, whose war on Terror really amounts to a war against Islam. He regularly praises Iran, and is even willing to fudge the most basic facts in Iran’s favor. In one instance he claims that Iran has more women in Parliament than the United States. For those who wish to write off such patently false statistics as “errors” take note.

Far from a reformist or moderate in any Western sense , Qazwini is as tricky a double-faced Muslim Imam as they get. His lip service to liberal values , is overshadowed by his open support of Kmoeini’s Islamic Revolution in Iran throughout the entire eighties, and his continued support of the Iranian regime...
Read the entire thing

Friday, May 23, 2008

Obama Courts Jewish Voters

It astounds me that Jews would even CONSIDER voting for this miscreant given hussein obama's ties to radical muslims among other vile antisemites. Here he is making his pitch to Jewish voters at a Florida synagogue and having the gall to claim he has fought against antisemitism. Yet he stayed in a church for 20 years listening to a pastor repeatedly spew anti-Israel and antisemitic diatribes, stood by while the church published editorials by hamas terrorists accusing Israel of creating a weapon designed to kill blacks and Arabs, and remained in the church even after they honored louis farrakhan. Hussein Obama also associates with Rashid Khalidi who has referred to the founding of Israel as a catastrophe. This guy is about the biggest fraud, liar and charlatan to ever run for office and that's saying alot. He tailors his remarks according to what the audience he's speaking to wants to hear. For example, while he tells a leftist crowd in Oregon he doesn't believe Iran presents a threat to us, he then goes to Iowa and tells them he believes Iran is a serious threat and that he has always maintained that view. The fact that he doesn't get villified and politically damaged for such blatant contradictions and ignorance regarding history (he said Truman and FDR negotiated with enemies, which they certainly did not), is because he is protected by those degenerate low-life pimps and whores in the media who don't care about this country, in fact they likely hate America and have become no different than Pravda during the days of the Soviet Union. Hussein doesn't need to waste money paying people to serve on his campaign staff when he has the media promoting his candidacy for free. They are clearing a path for him to the White House and will attempt to destroy anyone who gets in his way. Be prepared for the same ugly, vicious treatment by the msm directed at John McCain as has been done to Hillary Clinton.

Getting back to the subject at hand, although the article makes clear that members of the synagogue were skeptical, I would bet that most foolish Jews will vote for hussein should he be the nominee. This is because they cannot conceive of themselves voting for a Republican no matter who the democrats nominate. I cannot understand this stubborn insistence by Jews of sticking with the democratic party despite all evidence it is purging itself of moderates and welcoming moveon and dailykos radical left antisemites.
Barack Obama went to a Florida synagogue and made his pitch for Jewish support. He faced a skeptical crowd that did not exactly give him a hero’s welcome. But what was most striking were comments like this that are breathtaking in their audacity:

“Don’t judge me because I have a funny name. Don’t judge me because I am an African American. People are concerned about memories of the past. … That is exactly what I am fighting in the African American community when I hear anti-Semitic statements. We are bigger than that.”

First, the insinuation, which he has made more than once, that Jews oppose him because of his name or his race (or because another African American made anti-Semitic remarks) is insulting and condescending. He should drop it from his repertoire and address the real concerns Jewish voters have expressed.

That brings us to his jaw-dropping comment that he has been fighting anti-Semitic statements in the African American community. Excuse me, but did he rebuke Reverend Wright for the Israel is a “dirty word” remark (before Wright’s National Press Club attack on his political sincerity) or when Wright launched into his tirade about a fantastical ethnic bomb created by Israel? Didn’t he attend Farrakhan’s Million Man March? One wonders why Obama would make such a remark, knowing as he must that his association with and choice of a hatemonger as mentor who spewed anti-Israel venom is one of the key concerns for the very audience whose votes he now seeks. Perhaps an apology for years of ignoring Wright’s vile comments would have been a better approach.

Obama also made his appeal at the synagogue as a defender and friend of Israel, defying anyone to find an anti-Israel comment he has made. And he vowed not to negotiate unconditonally with Hamas or Hezbollah. No such promise with regard to their state sponsor Iran, however. He claims it is “distortion” by others to claim he wants to negotiate unconditionally with the terrorist groups themselves. But of course, that is a distortion. The focus of the debate is on his promise with regard to state sponsors of terror and his apparent indifference, indeed his understanding of the reasons why Hamas would look favorably on him as President.

Many Jews have real concerns about Obama’s toleration for Wright, his willingness to provide an international publicity platform for the world’s most prominent holocaust denier, and even his close association with Palestinian activists who defame Israel. To win voters over, he will have to be honest in assessing and addressing their concerns. Then he can try to articulate why it would be in our national security interest, and in Israel’s, to talk without preconditions with Ahmadinejad. That’s the basis for a real dialogue with the Jewish community on matters of foreign policy.

Obama Delegate Committed Espionage

Yet another patriotic, upstanding individual who is backing Hussein Obama. This time it is a former muslim army chaplain, Captain James J. Yee, who was charged with espionage. He was accused of being part of a spy ring at the U.S. run prison in Guantanamo Bay. He is now a delegate for Obama.
Former Moslem Army chaplain, Captain James J. Yee, formerly stationed at Guantanamo has recently joined the ranks of Obama delegates. If the name seems familiar that is because
The West Point graduate was accused in 2003 of being part of a spy ring at the U.S. prison for suspected terrorists in Guantanamo Bay.

After spending 76 days in solitary confinement, he was exonerated, resigned from the Army and received an honorable discharge.

Ah but Charles Johnson over at Little Green Footballs clarifies and corrects the bland background of the seemingly victimized Yee.

Yee was certainly not exonerated or cleared; the charges were dropped, according to Maj. Gen. Geoffrey D. Miller, commander of Joint Task Force Guantanamo, because there were "national security concerns that would arise from the release of the evidence" if the case proceeded.

Recently, James Yee appeared on Syrian television to describe the horrors of Guantanamo Bay, even though he never actually witnessed any horrors:( Video: Former Gitmo Muslim Chaplain on Koran Desecration.)

Yes, he does sound like the perfect Obama delegate.

Unfit to be President

Barack Hussein Obama should really be proud of himself for giving a boost to Iran's maniacal ugly little dictator, thanks to his brilliant move in publicly claiming that he doesn't view Iran as a serious threat to the U.S. Even just being a candidate, this imbecile is doing damage to our international standing, bolstering our enemies and undermining internal Iranian opposition to mahmoud ahmadinejad. Just imagine the damage he would do if he were to actually become president.
May 21, 2008 -- BUOYED by their modest electoral success last month, critics of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's provocative foreign policy were preparing to launch a series of attacks on him in the Islamic Majlis, Iran's ersatz parliament. But then Ahmadinejad got an unexpected boost from Barack Obama.

Ali Larijani, Iran's former nuclear negotiator and now a Majlis member, was arguing that the Islamic Republic would pay a heavy price for Ahmadinejad's rejection of three UN Security Council resolutions on nukes. Then the likely Democratic presidential nominee stepped in.

Obama announced that, if elected, he wouldn't ask Iran to comply with UN resolutions as a precondition for direct talks with Ahmadinejad: "Preconditions, as it applies to a country like Iran, for example, was a term of art. Because this administration has been very clear that it will not have direct negotiations with Iran until Iran has met preconditions that are essentially what Iran views, and many other observers would view, as the subject of the negotiations; for example, their nuclear program."

"Talking without preconditions" would require America to ignore three unanimous Security Council resolutions. Before starting his unconditional talks, would Obama present a new resolution at the Security Council to cancel the three that Ahmadinejad doesn't like? Or would the new US president act in defiance of the United Nations - further weakening the Security Council's authority?

President Bush didn't set the preconditions that Obama promises to ignore. They were agreed upon after the International Atomic Energy Agency reported that Iran was in violation of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. Acting in accordance with its charter, the IAEA referred the issue to the Security Council.

Dismissing the preconditions as irrelevant would mean snubbing America's European allies plus Russia and China, all of whom participated in drafting and approving the resolutions that Ahmadinejad doesn't like.

Such a move would make a mockery of multilateral diplomacy - indeed, would ignore such diplomacy in exactly the way that critics claim the Bush administration has.

Victory Against Classroom Jihadis

A victory for sanity, the American way of life and a defeat for the global jihad. Thanks to the efforts of the UAC, The Academy for Learning Islam has been permanently removed from the Dividends and Speaker’s Bureau programs of the Seminole County Public School System in Central Florida for repeatedly violating the school board rules. In a class which was misleadingly named family dynamics, students had instead been forced to sit and listen to discussions about islam. This is among the myriad of ways that muslim jihadists are steathily working to infiltrate every aspect of American society and culture, schools and the government in their goal to replace the American constitution with sharia. It is thanks to groups like the UAC and many others for keeping watch and thwarting the jihadists' plans.

Thursday, May 22, 2008

Italians Fight Back

Great news from Italy. In honor of the late Oriana Fallaci, it was decided in Verona to bulldoze a building used by muslims for prayer. In its place will be a public square named after Fallaci, who courageously fought to save her country from being islamicized. This is a wonderful tribute and its great to see Italians take back their country. This is the way the west needs to fight islam. Perhaps there is hope after all. It looks as though maybe the islamists pushed too far, too soon and now a strong backlash may beginning to occur throughout the west. At least this is what I fervently hope. The islamists may have made a fatal mistake in believing the west is weak because they mostly hear the voices of surrender from leftist dhimmis and wrongly assume the vast majority of the populations in western countries also lack any fighting spirit and share the same willingness to surrender as the elites.
VERONA — Goodbye mosque. In its place, Oriana Fallaci Square.

This decision was taken by the committee of Oppeano (Verona), where yesterday morning a building used by Muslims for prayer was bulldozed. In its place, the Municipality will create a public square named after the writer of The Rage and the Pride, which promoted a bitter campaign against Islam.
- - - - - - - - -
The decision to raze the structure which had been opened by ONLUS [translator’s note: Organizzazione Non Lucrativa di Utilita’ Sociale, a non-profit registered Italian charity] “For the success of Muslims”, was taken by the municipal administration, which acquired the area for €70,000 in order to transform it into an open area for parking and green space.

“My citizens did not want this takeover,” explained the mayor, Alessandro Montagnoli, deputy of the Lega Nord, “above all because it could create problems of practicability and cohabitation with the residents.”

Why Obama is Dangerous

Barack Hussein Obama proves once more why he isn't fit to be president of the United States and why he would actually be a danger to our national security. Speaking before a crowd in Oregon on Sunday, Hussein Obama denied that Iran is a serious threat to the U.S. He makes this outrageous, foolish claim even though Iran is vigorously pursuing a nuclear weapons program, threatening to annihilate Israel once it has nukes, provides weapons and money to terrorist proxies hamas, as well as hezbollah, which is exercising control over Lebanon, and providing weapons to terrorists killing American soldiers in Iraq. Such mushy thinking is what brought the mullahs to power in the first place under Jimmy Carter who actually facilitated the fall of our ally the Shah and ushered in the islamic revolution. Carter thought the madman ayatollah khomeini was a peaceful and holy man and he screwed over the Shah. We've been paying for this fatal error for 30 years. In fact much of the problems in the Middle East today stem from Carter's bungling or even possibly outright malicious actions with regard to Iran. Hussein Obama would like to revert back to Carter era foreign policy. This is the last thing we need now that the situation in the Middle East is more dangerous than ever.

Note to Obama: Your mask is slipping.

Barack Obama has tried his best to conceal the fact that underneath all the soothing rhetoric about "change" and being a new kind of politican, he is nothing but a 1960's style liberal with some incredibly naive views about American foreign policy.

Yesterday in front of 75,000 adoring fans, Obama really let his inner liberal take over and made one of the most outrageously stupid comment of the campaign to date. If the GOP were smart, they would take this comment and run it from now until November.

Jennifer Rubin at Commentary:

This remarkable bit of footage from Barack Obama's appearance in Oregon last night is now floating around on YouTube. It might be useful as an undergraduate course exam: how many errors can you spot? Obama apparently believes that Iran and other rogues states (he lists Iran, Cuba and Venezuela) "don't pose a serious threat to the U.S." Iran, specifically, he tells us spends so little on defense relative to us that if Iran "tried to pose a serious threat to us they wouldn't . . . they wouldn't stand a chance."

So, taken literally, he seems not much concerned about Iran's acquisition of nuclear weapons, its sponsorship of terrorist organizations, its commitment to eradicate Israel, its current actions in supplying weapons that have killed hundreds of Americans in Iraq, and its role in eroding Lebanon's sovereignty through its client Hezbollah.

Echoes of the '60's to be sure. At that time, even the Soviets weren''t considered a threat because they would never start a war due to their losing 20 million in World War II. Of course, it is never brought up that the Soviets were perfectly willing to assist Hitler in starting the war by making a secret pact with the Nazi dictator that carved up Poland and deliniated spheres of influence for the two powers.

And we know now that the period from 1983-85, Soviet leaders were actively contemplating a first strike against the United States before our conventional military build up was complete.
So it should come as no surprise that Obama - a man whose associations with 1960's radicals is documented and who has immersed himself in liberal dogma his entire adult life - should come out and say something so ridiculous that it is going to cost him considerably at the polls.

How many more gaffes like this does the candidate have in him? Let's hope there are several between now and the election.

Ed Lasky adds:

Going beyond Jennifer Rubin's valuable comments about Barack Obam's benign view of Iran, why are we just hearing these views said so explicitly now? Could it be that Barack Obama, on the cusp of securing the Democratic Party nomination, no longer has to cover his true views?

Furthermore, there has been a spate of articles the last week speculating that he feels secure in being able to capture enough of the Jewish vote (whcih is not necessarily pro-Israel) in key states that he feels he can dismiss concerns about Iran and Israel. How does that relate to his early supporters who all but shilled for him regarding his "love for Israel", the steadfastness of his support for the nation? Will he be as dismissive towards them going forward as he has been towards Israel?

He seems all but ready to ignore the entire region-including regional allies-whose views towards America may be less than perfect but whose cooperation going forward will depend on their feelings that America will be alert to the threat posed by Iran and form in resisting, if not rolling back, Iranian imperialism run amok. Beyond these concerns, his naivete is remarkable. Pollyanish attitudes are perilous for a President to have; Hope is not a foreign policy. It is a Hallmark Card sentiment and a campaign slogan.

Rich Baehr agrees that "this is exactly what is going on- he has won,and is now basking in the love of his partisans on the left, who have won control of the Democratic Party."

If so, it will be interesting to see how the press plays this dramatic shift leftward.

Wednesday, May 21, 2008

Al-Dura Libel Case Overturned

The French Court of Appeals has overturned the libel judgement against Phillipe Karsenty and determined that Karsenty did not libel France 2's Charles Enderlin when he claimed that the supposed death of the Mohamed Al-Dura boy was staged with the collusion of France 2's palestinian stringer, cameraman, and with the full knowledge of Charles Enderlin and France 2, which had in its possession several minutes of raw footage showing staged scenes during the events at the Netzarim Junction in the Gaza Strip that day in September 2000. And even if the boy had been killed, his death could not have been caused by the IDF because of where they were positioned.

Hamas Raids Mosque, Injures Several

Terrorists from the Izzedeen El-Qassam Battalions wing of hamas raided and took control of a mosque, expelled and beat its caretakers as well as several equally scum hamas supporters who gathered inside to perform afternoon prayers. Not that I have a problem when jihadists beat up on each other mind you, nor do I care that they do so inside mosques and beat up crazed imams in the process. However America and Israel have rules of engagement where they can't so much as shoot at a koran, let alone attack or even enter a mosque, even if terrorists are holed up inside. Because this would be sacrilegious and enrage the muslim masses and all hell would break loose. Yet muslims, whether it be in Iraq or the PA run territories have no qualms about beating and shooting each other inside mosques and even blowing-up mosques. These "brave" mohamedan warriors also beat up on women who were protesting outside the mosque.
Gunmen belonging to Izzedeen El-Qassam Battalions and members of the Police raided Imam Mohammad Naser El-Deen El-Albani Mosque in Jabalia refugee camp two days ago. They took control of the mosque after expelling its caretakers, beating several of them. PCHR views this attack as part of the ongoing security chaos plaguing the OPT.

PCHR’s preliminary investigation and eyewitness accounts indicate that at approximately 15:45 on Saturday, 17 May, masked gunmen headed to the Imam Mohammad Naser El-Deen El-Albani Mosque in Bloc 5 of Jabalia refugee camp. A vehicle carrying Izzedeen El-Qassam Battalions gunmen and two police cars accompanied the masked gunmen. The gunmen entered the mosque and demanded that the Imam, Abd El-Halim Abdallah Awad, and the Director of the Kitab and Sunna Association, Ashraf Wadi, to leave the mosque and stop managing it under order from Hamas. After a discussion between both parties, Wadi went to the police station in Jabalia refugee camp and submitted a complaint against the gunmen. Then he returned to the mosque. Several Hamas supporters gathered inside the mosque and started to perform afternoon (Aser) prayers. The gunmen used their gun butts to attack Wadi and Awad and other members of the Kitab and Sunna Associations. Then they threw them out of the mosque. Several neighbors, including women, gathered to protest what was happening inside the mosque. The gunmen beat several women.

Imam Awad took the remaining members of the Association out of the mosque through a door connecting the mosque to his nearby house. The gunmen destroyed part of the wall separating the roofs of the house and the mosque. The whole episode resulted in the injury of more than 20 people with bruises.

It is noted that the Imam Mohammad Naser El-Deen El-Albani Mosque was established by the Kitab and Sunna Association, which is a benevolent society of the Salafi movement.

PCHR strongly condemns the attack by the Izzedeen El-Qassam Battalions gunmen on the people and the take over of the mosque in Jabalia refugee camp. The Centre strongly condemns the police for not interfering to prevent the abuse by the gunmen who have no official capacity and are not a law enforcement body. The Centre views this attack as a continuation of the security chaos plaguing the Occupied Palestinian Territory.
Hat tip Backspin

IDF Doctors Treat Palestinians

The msm and the left paint a distorted picture of the IDF as this evil and abusive "occupying" force oppressing the palestinians. Yet because Israel is actually an ethical, humane society, it provides medical treatment to the citizens of its enemies even while they wage war against Israel. Israeli army doctors serving on a military base near Ramallah run an emergency clinic for local palestinians. Now would muslims do the same thing for Jews?
Blech. Cheezy. This feels like too much of a public relations plug for Israel.

…these were my thoughts as I hung up the phone after I was briefed on a potential story involving Israeli army doctors and their benevolence toward Palestinians.

The media will never buy this - or the readers. Oh, what the hell… I’ll make a few calls.

By the time I seated myself in a stiff plastic hospital-issue chair opposite 14-year-old Shadi Sani’s bed three weeks later, my skepticism had dissipated.

Shadi is a bit goggle-eyed and he has lost the ability to speak. But his father Abu Shali, seated at Shadi’s bedside, says his son understands bits and pieces of conversation. Shadi’s food intake comes via a drip tube, he has trouble breathing and it’s tough for him to sit upright. He has undergone brain surgery to relieve pressures of brain damage and through rehab he is re-learning to walk.

As I chat with his father via an Arabic-to-Hebrew interpreter from Gaza City, Shadi occasionally offers up broad beaming smiles - the kind that prompt an urge to squeeze his hand and give him a hug.

Shadi has been in Israel’s Alyn Orthopedic Rehab Facility for Children since January and his mother Tamam, seated on his other side, says the family doesn’t know when he’ll be released home to Ramallah.

For now they’re relieved that he’s alive.

Over cappuccino at a Tel Aviv cafĂ©, Dr. Eran Poran told me Shadi’s story, which began at the Halamish army base in the West Bank, where he serves as an IDF army physician. “It was December. Raining and cold outside. I got a radio call to come to the gate. Urgently. The guard told me a taxi with a few Palestinians had pulled up and that they were screaming for help. A boy had been hurt.

“So I went with another officer. We got to the gate - we can’t take the chance of letting Palestinians inside the army base for security reasons - and the officer turned pale. I knew it wasn’t good.

“At first glance I saw a kid who looked to be about twelve. He was pasty, unconscious and bleeding from his face. He was clearly in critical condition so I called for an entire team to come help me. We worked on him on the ground right there outside the gate.”

As Poran and fellow army docs and medics administered CPR and stabilized the boy, the cousin who drove the boy to the base relayed details: while home alone in his Ramallah village, Shadi had fallen from the railing-free 3rd floor of his home directly onto his head. The cousin had found him lying on the ground unconscious and brought him to the army base because he had heard there was a doctor and medical facilities on the grounds.

Tuesday, May 20, 2008

Obama: Israel a "Constant Sore"

In an interview with the Atlantic, Barack Hussein Obama, in response to Jeffery Goldberg's question about whether he thinks America's support of Israel is a drag on America's reputation overseas, responded by terming the conflict a constant wound and a constant sore which infects our foreign policy. The "constant sore" phraseology may have been borrowed from his friend, university professor Rhashid Khalidi, anti-Israel activist and supporter of palestinian terrorism who has falsely accused Israel of ethnic cleansing, and who held a fundraiser for Hussein Obama. Khalidi has also falsely accused Israel of being a racist apartheid state, has referred to Israel's founding as a catastrophe and that Israel should be dissolved in favor of a binational state. This of course would eventually lead to the creation of an islamic state and another holocaust, as muslims would overwhelm the Jewish population, since as we know that non-muslims are persecuted, murdered and driven out of every islamic nation.

Obama is of the Walt and Mearsheimer school of thought that Israel is a burden upon America rather than a reliable and loyal democratic ally and strategic asset, and a country in which we share common values with. And like Walt and Mearsheimer, Obama attributes our policy towards Israel to Jewish hawks. Such individuals, as seen through their own narrow radical left political lens, are unable to see the value in our alliance with Israel, so they must attribute it to dark forces. Hussein Obama also referred to Jewish so-called "settlements" as a hinderance to peace rather the Arab rejectionism. It's always amusing when such people who call on Israel to commit suicide, claim they are doing so out of friendship for Israel, saving Israel from itself. They are sure they know what's best no matter how many times they are proven wrong. People like Obama and J-street continue to see this as a conflict over territory rather than a religious ideological one. They are unable to grasp the fact that muslims believe that they have a God-given right to rule over non-muslims and that non-muslims at best must live as dhimmis under islamic rule. And certainly there can be no sovereign Jewish state or any sovereign non-muslim state in the dar al islam. There is nothing America or Israel can do to make the Arab-muslims accept Israel no matter how much territory is surrendered. Only the complete transformation of the Arab-muslim culture and the destruction of islam can change the situation.
JERUSALEM – In terming the Israeli-Palestinian conflict a "constant sore" last week, did Sen. Barack Obama borrow the phraseology of a pro-Palestinian activist and harsh critic of Israel who has been described as a friend of the senator?

Columbia University Professor Rashid Khalidi also previously held a fundraiser for Obama. He has made repeated statements supportive of Palestinian terror.

In a much-quoted interview with the Atlantic, Obama was asked last week whether he thinks Israel is a "drag on America's reputation oversees."

Obama replied: "No, no, no. But what I think is that this constant wound, that this constant sore, does infect all of our foreign policy."

He went on to say the "lack of a resolution to this problem provides an excuse for anti-American militant jihadists to engage in inexcusable actions, and so we have a national-security interest in solving this, and I also believe that Israel has a security interest in solving this because I believe that the status quo is unsustainable. I am absolutely convinced of that, and some of the tensions that might arise between me and some of the more hawkish elements in the Jewish community in the United States might stem from the fact that I'm not going to blindly adhere to whatever the most hawkish position is just because that's the safest ground politically."

Obama's remarks, slammed by pro-Israel and Republican organizations, came five days after the Nation magazine published an opinion piece by Khalidi, titled "Palestine: Liberation Deferred" in which the Palestinian activist opened by calling the "Palestinian question" a "running sore."

"The 'Palestine Question' has been with us for sixty years. During this time it has become a running sore, its solution appearing ever more distant," wrote Khalidi in the first paragraph of his op-ed
Continue Reading

Monday, May 19, 2008

The Latest Haveil Havalim

This week's edition of the Jewish blog carnival Haveil Havilim, #166, the mommy blogger edition, is up at Ima.

A Portrait of Obama

A video portrait of Barack Hussein Obama, his association with pastor Wright and his lifelong indoctrination into the angry radical politics of racism, black nationalism, marxism and anti-Americanism.

The Myth of Palestine

The Arabs, in their own words, expose the fraud that is at the heart of the Palestinian cause. Here are direct quotes from prominent Arabs which prove beyond the shadow of a doubt that palestinian nationality is a recent invention created by the Arabs for the sole purpose of destroying Israel. No such country as Palestine or a people known as palestinians had ever existed. All of those western leftist enablers of the faux palestinian cause need to be confronted and challenged at every turn using these quotes. Unfortunately the Arabs' false narrative of so-called "palestinians" as the indigenious people of the region and Israeli Jews as "colonialists" and usurpers of Arab land, has been accepted throughout the world because of decades of unchallenged propaganda, lies and indoctrination from the western leftist media and academia. We should no longer allow them to get away with their lies and propaganda. We cannot be hindered by charges of "racism", a weapon leftists use to silence us. It is the Arabs who are the racist, colonial occupiers and who practice apartheid. The so-called "palestinians" are not entitled to statehood. They should be settled in Arab countries.
At the Annapolis Conference, President Bush spoke about his vision regarding the virtues of two nations for two peoples.

One of those peoples – the Jewish people – has a clear identity. Yet it would be interesting to know the identity of the second people. Already in 1977, a central spokesman of that “second people” (a PLO leader, Zahir Muhsein, head of the as-Sa’iqa Organization) revealed the truth in an interview to the Dutch newspaper Trouw. Here are his words:

“The Palestinian people do not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the State of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct ‘Palestinian people’ to oppose Zionism for tactical reasons. Jordan, a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa. As a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan.”

In 1974, the late Syrian President, Hafez al-Assad,declared, “It would be fitting for us to mention to the responsible Israeli authorities that we view Palestine not just as an inseparable part of the Arab nation, but also as a part of southern Syria.” In 1987 he reiterated this at a conference in Amman by saying, “A country named ‘Palestine’ has never existed.” Jordan’s King Hussein responded, “The appearance of the national Palestinian persona serves as a response to Israel’s claim that Palestine is Jewish.”

Yet the prize goes to Yasir Arafat who, in 1970 with candid simplicity, told the reporter Arianna Palazzi, “The question of borders doesn’t interest us… From the Arab standpoint, we mustn’t talk about borders. Palestine is nothing but a drop in an enormous ocean. Our nation is the Arabic nation that stretches from the Atlantic Ocean to the Red Sea and beyond it… The PLO is fighting Israel in the name of Pan-Arabism. What you call ‘Jordan’ is nothing more than Palestine.”

Such revelations are an eye-opener for anyone who has not understood until now the masked ball being run by the Arabs. The true meaning of Arafat’s words – that Palestine is Jordan – is that for the Arabic people living under the “Pan-Arab” umbrella, in addition to over 20 Arabic countries, there is already a country called Jordan that was established by the British for the Arabs on 78 percent of the Land of Israel. This is land promised to the Jewish people by the League of Nations in 1922.

Anywhere else on earth, could an additional country be established for a people that already has 21 countries?

All the same, there is nothing like the testimony of a PLO founder, Ahmed Shukari. Already in 1956 he proclaimed from the UN podium, as the Arab League’s ambassador there, “Such a creature as Palestine does not exist at all. This land is nothing but the southern portion of Greater Syria…”

Yet the most compelling argument for the idea that the “Palestinian people” is a fraudulent invention (and that the Arabs are all one people) was expounded by none other than Mr. Husseini, head of the Supreme Arab Committee to the UN special committee that was deliberating on Eretz Yisrael in 1947. Here are his words:

“An additional consideration of great importance for the Arab world is racial uniformity. The Arabs lived in a broad expanse stretching from the Mediterranean Sea to the Indian Ocean. They spoke one language, and shared a common history, tradition and aspirations. Their unity was the solid foundation for peace in one of the most central and sensitive regions in the world. For that reason, it does not make sense that the United Nations should facilitate the establishment of a foreign entity within that well-rooted unity.”
Read the whole thing Hat tip Israpundit

Sunday, May 18, 2008

Wahabbi Education for U.S. Soldiers

American soldiers from Fort Belvoir in Fairfax Va, graduated from a wahabbi Saudi academy where they learned Arabic and Middle Eastern culture and traditions.

This academy, the Islamic Saudi Academy came under scrutiny last year over concerns that it was promoting islamic extremism and intolerance as is the case with Saudi run schools all over the world. Textbooks used in schools in Saudi Arabia promte violence against Jews, Christians, Shias and polytheists.

The academy was founded in 1984 to educate pre-kindegarten through 12th grade children of Saudi diplomats. Others are also enrolled. The ISA teaches extreme hatred of non-muslims. Students are taught that Jews come from Apes and Christians come from Swine. The school teaches that trusted friends can only be muslim. That even family members, if they are unbelievers, should be abandoned or ignored. Now this sounds like a characteristic of a cult, which is what islam is. Cults typically brainwash their members into abandoning their families and friends and that only other cult members should be considered their true family. That people further away from you geographically and culturally are truly closer to you than the family you live with if your family does not believe. That one should never establish a close and trusted friendship with a non-Muslim. Ninth and 12th grade curricula indoctrinate in the concept of jihad, holy war, as an obligation to fight and kill the non-muslim enemy. Cinnamon Stillwell has more of this story.