Friday, October 31, 2008

More on the Khalidi Event

Debbie Shlussel reports that a Muslim children's "dance" troupe from Milwaukee, Sanabel AlQuds Dabka, were guests at the event honoring Khalidi which Obama attended in 2003. Here is an example of the kind of "performances" this group entertains audiences with. In 2004 Debbie went undercover to attend a fundraiser for Islamic Relief, a front organization for al qaeda and hamas in which this kids dance troupe performed. She says that during this performance the dancers pulled out fake rifles and swords and pretended to behead or shoot three of the dancers who were wearing American, British and Israeli flags respectively. Then red scarves were placed on the three boys heads, signifying blood and no head. John Conyers and his wife were guests of honor at that event and applauded this sickening performance. This bum sits in the U.S. congress and yet attends events with enemies of America who want to murder our countrymen. That is because he represents a district which is an enclave of Muslim immigrant fifth columnists. It is not known if the troupe actually performed this "dance" at the Khalidi event. But even so, the idea that we are on the verge of electing to president, a man who is comfortable being in the company of radical Muslims is frightening. I'm going to pray for McCain.

As you all know, the Los Angeles Times is holding hostage a tape of Barack Obama at a 2003 Arab American Action Network (AAAN) dinner at which his friends, Rashid Khalidi, William Ayers, and Bernadine Dohrn were in attendance. It's the story I started when Los Angeles Times plagiarist/"reporter" Peter Wallsten ripped off my January column on Barack Obama's Nation of Islam staffers and friendship with AAAN founder Ali Abunimah.

But here's what you haven't yet heard: that a kids' dance troupe that appeared at the event has a history of simulating beheadings and stomping on American, Israeli, and British flags.

Obama's America

Helen Jones-Kelley, director of the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services and who donated $2,500 to Hussein Obama's campaign authorized the Ohio government to do a background check on Joe the plumber's child support records. This with the approval of the Democratic governor.

Following the third presidential debate, a state agency director and maximum donor to the Barack Obama presidential campaign immediately authorized a government background check of Joe the Plumber's child-support records.

Helen Jones-Kelley, director of the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services and a $2,500 contributor to the Obama campaign, permitted state employees to conduct a check on Samuel Joseph Worzelbacher, the Columbus Dispatch reported.

Now Ohio Inspector General Thomas P. Charles is seeking to determine whether at least four probes on state computers were legal.

Jones-Kelley denies the Support Enforcement Tracking System search was politically motivated and claims the check was ordered to verify that Worzelbacher was not behind on child-support payments.

While the state agency director would not share information about Joe the Plumber's record with the Dispatch, Worzelbacher reportedly lives with his 13-year-old boy, and it is uncertain whether he has ever been ordered to pay child support.

Jones-Kelley said such background checks are not unusual.

"Our practice is when someone is thrust quickly into the public spotlight, we often take a look," she said. "Our practice is to basically look at what is coming our way."
Continue reading

That is, of course, any public figure but "the one". The media along with the democratic party can go to hell. The media and the demorats have provided cover and enabled all of the criminal activities, the illegal caucuses, fraudulent voter registrations, hiding of Obama's background and possibly ineligibility to be president, the harassing of ordinary Americans who don't fall in line or to dare question Obama, including Joe the plumber etc. Both the media and the democratic party have declared themselves enemies of America by virtue of these activities. Their aim is to seize power at any cost and we can say goodbye to our freedoms. No criticism of the messiah will be tolerated in this new America.

Allah Favors Obama

A survey of Americans living in Israel revealed that absentee voters supported McCain over Obama by a margin of 3-1. This is the complete reversal of Jewish voters living in America. I also heard that Iraqis are hoping McCain wins, fearing Obama will abandon them to the jihadis.

On the other side, al qaeda has made an official statement essentially endorsing Obama by calling on Allah to humiliate Bush and the Republican party:

Oh Allah, Lord of mankind, humiliate Bush and his party!
Oh, Allah, degrade and defy him!
Oh Allah, Lord of mankind, defy him!
Oh Allah, make him live a day like the day Pharoah, Haman, and Qarun experienced...

The Khalidi Tape

The LA Times says it won't release the Khalidi tape because the reporter Peter Wallsten claims to have made an agreement with the source to not publicly disclose the tape. Now this doesn't make much sense, since if the source did not want the tape revealed why even bother giving it to a reporter at all, allowing him to write the story? If it was ok for him to write the story, what difference is it if he releases the tape? The bottom line is that the LA Times is lying and won't release the tape because it is potentially devastating to Obama's campaign. Supposedly the tape shows Obama congratulating Khalidi for his work and saying
"Israel has no God-given right to occupy Palestine" plus there's been "genocide against the Palestinian people by Israelis."

I also have an alternate theory. I'm curious to know where exactly this claim originated that the Khalidi tape featured that quote from Obama. I have this strong feeling that opponents of Obama are being set-up and we have to be careful about taking the bait. It reminds me of the "whitey" tape controversy. It is possible that Obama does not say something quite so devastating on the tape and that he may merely just be praising Khalidi without saying anything about Israel. Someone may have put that quote out there so that if the tape does get released, what Obama actually said would be mild in comparison and once again he would be made to look like the victim. And although its bad enough that Obama would attend a dinner honoring khalidi, that will be overlooked while he is made to seem the victim of a smear campaign. This tape would then turn out to actually benefit obama. Even though he was amongst like-minded people, Obama is careful not to be so explicit in his public statements, especially since he was running for the U.S. senate at the time. That is how he came this far, by not being candid about his true beliefs.

Thursday, October 30, 2008

The Real Obama

I was just listening to a local talk radio host and he said that Obama has a half brother living in squalor in Kenya and a disabled aunt in Boston, also living in poverty. Hussein Obama talked lovingly of both of these family members in his book, yet has not lifted a finger to assist either one of them, with all of his money, buying himself expensive suits and so forth. Yet gullible fools believe he cares about the poor and is going to take care of them and their needs. The talk radio host also said that Obama's aunt won't discuss her relationship with him until after the election and believes either she was pressured or bribed to keep quiet. If this man can treat his own family members this way, how will he treat the people of this nation?

Biden Interview

Here is Barbara West doing a great job interviewing Joe Biden on a Florida TV station. Finally someone in the media asking some tough questions of the Obama campaign. Among the questions she asked Biden was whether he was ashamed about ACORN's voter registration fraud. Biden lied and said the campaign had nothing to do with it and that the campaign did not pay ACORN to get out the vote, which of course it did. The Obama campaign paid an offshoot of ACORN $800,000 for "get out the vote" projects. In order to whitewash Obama's ties to ACORN, Biden absurdly asked Barbara West that since McCain had complimented ACORN on the work they do, if that makes McCain a benefactor of ACORN too. But of course McCain was not ACORN's lawyer nor did he train its activists or give money to the organization. And Biden also bizarrely claimed that McCain got it wrong in Iraq, while Obama got it right when just the opposite is true. It was McCain who was correct in backing the now successful surge while Obama wrongly opposed it and would instead have surrendered and withdrawn our forces from Iraq, leaving America defeated and weakened while our enemies would have been strengthened. I still can't believe this guy is considered a foreign policy expert. And of course West confronted him about Obama's marxist tendencies, which annoyed Biden and now as we know, the campaign will no longer do interviews with that station or any other media outlets which dare to ask them hard questions.

Islam is a Religion of War

Why is it that western religious and political leaders are reluctant to state publicly the obvious? That Islam is a religion of hate and war. Why are they afraid to simply say what we all know, which is that Islam mandates its adherents to wage holy war, jihad, and to subjugate or kill nonbelievers? Western leftists deny that this is a basic element of Islam, that it really is a peaceful religion that's been distorted by terrorists, or they morally equivocate by saying that all religions have their extremists, as though Christians, Jews, Buddhists and Hindus are equally guilty of mass slaughter in the name of their religions. Does it ever occur to them why Islam, unlike any other religion, inspires such extreme violent fanaticism in a large percentage of its followers? Is it logical to conclude that so many of them are getting it wrong about their own religion? Or should it tell us there is something inherently evil in the doctrine of Islam? And that the jihadis aren't merely some fringe element but indeed represent mainstream Islam.

If you don't believe me, take it from an ex-Muslim, Magdi Allam, who was baptized by the Pope and has written an open letter to Pope Benedict criticizing Cardinal Jean-Louis Tauran, president of the Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue, who told a conference back in August that Islam itself promotes peace but that some believers have betrayed their faith by committing violence. Allam insists that Islamic terrorism comes from the sayings in the Koran and thoughts and actions of Mohammed. Are western religious and political leaders listening? I doubt it. They will continue to deny the obvious to the detriment of us all.

VATICAN CITY (CNS) -- The Muslim-born journalist baptized by Pope Benedict XVI at Easter asked the pope to tell his top aide for relations with Muslims that Islam is not an intrinsically good religion and that Islamic terrorism is not the result of a minority gone astray.

As the Vatican was preparing to host the first meeting of the Catholic-Muslim Forum Nov. 4-6, Magdi Allam, a longtime critic of the Muslim faith of his parents, issued an open letter to Pope Benedict that included criticism of Cardinal Jean-Louis Tauran, president of the Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue.

In the letter, posted on his Web site Oct. 20, Allam said he wanted to tell the Pope of his concern for "the serious religious and ethical straying that has infiltrated and spread within the heart of the church."

He told the Pope that it "is vital for the common good of the Catholic Church, the general interest of Christianity and of Western civilization itself" that the Pope make a pronouncement in "a clear and binding way" on the question of whether Islam is a valid religion.

The Catholic Church's dialogue with Islam is based on the Second Vatican Council's Declaration on the Relationship of the Church to Non-Christian Religions ("Nostra Aetate"), which urged esteem for Muslims because "they adore the one God," strive to follow his will, recognize Jesus as a prophet, honor his mother, Mary, "value the moral life and worship God especially through prayer, almsgiving and fasting."

The council called on Catholics and Muslims "to work sincerely for mutual understanding" and for social justice, moral values, peace and freedom.

Allam told Pope Benedict he specifically objected to Cardinal Tauran telling a conference in August that Islam itself promotes peace but that "'some believers' have 'betrayed their faith,'" using it as a pretext for violence.

"The objective reality, I tell you with all sincerity and animated by a constructive intent, is exactly the opposite of what Cardinal Tauran imagines," Allam told the pope. "Islamic extremism and terrorism are the mature fruit" of following "the sayings of the Quran and the thought and action of Mohammed."

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Obama's Vision for America

Welcome to the People's Republic of America. American values are based on the idea of equality of opportunity. That provided with economic freedom, individual Americans can strive for success through their own hard work. The point of the civil rights movement was to remove obstacles that prevented blacks from receiving equal opportunity because of racism. The civil rights movement opened the door for blacks to attend schools and have careers in fields previously not open to them. But some people, such as Barack Hussein Obama, have confused equality of opportunity with equality of results. And that if equal results haven't been obtained naturally, it must be forced through governmental social engineering and redistribution of wealth. Here is U.S. Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D. Toledo) at a rally in Ohio, where she reveals the agenda of a potential Obama administration. Before Obama came on stage, she whipped up the crowd telling them that America needs a second bill of rights guaranteeing all Americans a job, health care, homes, an education and a fair playing field for farmers and businesses. How this can be achieved and how it will all be paid for is not explained. But Obama's followers are easily led suckers who believe they can actually get something for nothing. Forget about the traditional American ideal of rugged individualism, in Obama's America it will be a Euro-style cradle to grave system of government handouts.

Obama Equated America With Nazi Germany

While alot is being focused on Obama's comments about the redistribution of wealth during his 2001 interview with a Chicago radio station, something else he said should alarm and disgust Americans but has been ignored. He actually compared America during the time of Brown vs Board of Education, to nazi Germany.

“...just to take a, sort of a realist perspective...there’s a lot of change going on outside of the Court, um, that, that judges essentially have to take judicial notice of. I mean you’ve got World War II, you’ve got uh, uh, uh, the doctrines of Nazism, that, that we are fighting against, that start looking uncomfortably similar to what we have going on, back here at home.”

What more evidence do the voters need to finally come to the conclusion that Barack Hussein Obama is hostile to America? So the next time anyone accuses you of smearing Obama because you question his patriotism, send them a link to this interview. The segment quoted above is at 15:30 into the interview. Outside of FOX news and conservative talk radio, this interview is being ignored altogether as well as the video of Obama honoring Rashid Khalidi.

Obama, Citizen of the World

Guess who is enthusiastic over the prospect of an Obama presidency? That place which is a haven for every anti-American and anti-Israel dictatorship and Islamic terrorist state and largely controlled by the Arab League and the Organization of Islamic States. That of course would be the UN. This alone should give pause to any American considering voting for Obama. Why is it that foreigners who have anti-American feelings as well as outright enemies want to see Obama in the White House? Why is it that many of them even say they feel a kinship with Obama? Although its considered a smear to question Obama's loyalty to America, these foreign enemies know at heart what so many Americans fail to grasp, that he is fundamentally not one of us, but one of them. When Obama was in Berlin he called himself a citizen of the world. The ambassador from the Congo is even quoted in the article saying that he doesn't consider Obama African-American, he considers him African, period. And Kofi Annan says Obama becoming president would be "phenomenal". That should tell us all we need to know.

UNITED NATIONS -- There are no "Obama 2008" buttons, banners or T-shirts visible here at U.N. headquarters, but it might be difficult to find a sliver of territory in the United States more enthusiastic over the prospect of the Illinois senator winning the White House.

An informal survey of more than two dozen U.N. staff members and foreign delegates showed that the overwhelming majority would prefer that Sen. Barack Obama win the presidency, saying they think that the Democrat would usher in a new agenda of multilateralism after an era marked by Republican disdain for the world body.

Obama supporters hail from Russia, Canada, France, Britain, Germany, the Netherlands, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Indonesia and elsewhere. One American employee here seemed puzzled that he was being asked whether Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) was even a consideration. "Obama was and is unstoppable," the official said. "Please, God, let him win," he added.

"It would be hard to find anybody, I think, at the U.N. who would not believe that Obama would be a considerable improvement over any other alternative," said William H. Luers, executive director of the United Nations Association. "It's been a bad eight years, and there is a lot of bad feeling over it."

Conservatives who are skeptical of the United Nations said they are not surprised by the political tilt. "The fact is that most conservatives, most Republicans don't worship at the altar in New York, and I think that aggravates them more than anything else," said John R. Bolton, a former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations. "What they want is the bending of the knee, and they'll get it from an Obama administration."
Continue article

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

Obama's Despotism

I was just listening to a talk radio program and heard that Hussein Obama wants to overturn state laws to allow convicted felons to be able to vote. This should come as no surprise from a candidate who has used massive voter fraud in both the primaries and general election, including intimidation, harassment and busing in out of state voters to partake in caucuses, who managed to have every other candidate in his Illinois state senate race removed from the ballot. This guy is no better than a third world despot. People are looking for change and they will get change alright. There will be a radical transformation of the American form of government and economic system. With an overwhelmingly Democratic congress, there will be nothing to stop him.

Sexist Attacks Against Palin

This election season has revealed who the real misogynists are and who is really an obstacle to the progress of women. And it isn't Christian conservatives but rather so-called "progressives" who have made vicious and personal attacks against Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin. Anything from young punks wearing t-shirts which call Sarah the "c" word to shouting "stone her" during Obama rallies, and a comedienne wanting her to be gang raped, these "liberal" Obama followers are just outright hateful, angry and nasty people. I guess this is another kind of change we can expect. I also wonder how these twenty something brainless and dickless twits would like it if their mothers were being called the "c" word.

Palin deserves our respect

Helen McCaffrey

is the director of Women's Watch Inc., a nonprofit women's advocacy group based in Cape May

I cannot predict who will win the presidential campaign, but I already know who will lose big: all women.

I realized this when I saw a 20-something male student who attends a class in the community college where I teach, wearing a T-shirt that read, "Sarah Palin is a C-." He wore it in public, in broad daylight, and without shame or even consciousness of what he was doing.

I took the time to advise him of the "error of his ways" and informed him of the consequences if he wore it to my class.

This encounter shook me right down to my socks.

Most of my adult life has been spent working for civil rights for all Americans, as a lawyer defending constitutional rights and now as a college teacher and director of a nonprofit advocating for the rights of women.

Not since I told myself I could lose weight on the pizza and cheesecake diet have I been so self-deluded. This election cycle has been like stepping on the scale.

It was the encounter with the young man that woke me up, but there were signs all along the campaign trail. First, with the candidacy of Sen. Hillary Clinton, who won 18 million popular votes from the people of the United States and was ridiculed, marginalized, and put in her place when she wasn't even offered the vice presidency slot.

But the really big attack on women occurred when John McCain selected only the second woman in history to be on a major-party ticket. He chose a governor of a state critical to our energy crisis. She is a very popular governor with an 80-percent approval rate. She was elected on her own merit without previous political ties. She is her own political creation, not the wife, daughter, sister or mistress of a politician.

I thought Americans would be proud of her nomination, whether we agreed or disagreed with her on the issues. Was I in for a shock.

The sexism that I believed had been eradicated was lurking, like some creature from the black lagoon, just below the surface. Suddenly it erupted and in some unexpected places.
Continue the article h/t Soccerdad

Unmasking Obama

Just as I have said, Obama's idea of change is the entire radical overhauling of America's political and economic system. He essentially says as much in this 2001 interview where he discusses his ideas about legislating the redistribution of wealth and implies our constitution needs altering. Americans are completely in the dark about just what Obama means by his mantra of "change". This is the fault of the media which has throughout this campaign concealed the real Obama from voters. Obama has done a remarkable con job on the American public, putting a moderate face forward and not actually detailing precisely what kind of change he intends and the media doesn't ask and apparently the voters just want change for the sake of change and are putting their blind trust into this guy who has been hiding important details about his life such as his birth certificate, his college records and medical records.

If you look at the victories and failures of the civil rights movement and its litigation strategy in the court. I think where it succeeded was to invest formal rights in previously dispossessed people, so that now I would have the right to vote. I would now be able to sit at the lunch counter and order as long as I could pay for it I’d be o.k. But, the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and of more basic issues such as political and economic justice in society. To that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution, at least as its been interpreted and Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can’t do to you. Says what the Federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the Federal government or State government must do on your behalf, and that hasn’t shifted and one of the, I think, tragedies of the civil rights movement was, um, because the civil rights movement became so court focused I think there was a tendancy to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalition of powers through which you bring about redistributive change. In some ways we still suffer from that.

I’m not optimistic about bringing about major redistributive change through the courts. You know, the institution just isn’t structured that way.
Read the article

The Media Continues Protecting Obama

The LA Times refuses to release a video of Hussein Obama at an Israel bashing dinner honoring PLO operative Rashid Khalidi from 2003. Obama himself even gave a toast praising Khalidi. Khalidi and the Obama's were friends who often dined together. Khalidi has called the establishment of Israel a catastrophe and has falsely accused Israel of ethnic cleansing. Obama, as co-chairman with Bill Ayers of the Woods Fund, provided tens of thousands of dollars to Khalidi's organization the Arab American Action Network. Khalidi also hosted a fund raiser for Obama.

LA Times writer Peter Wallsten wrote about Barack Obama's close association with former Palestinian operative Rashid Khalidi back in April.
Wallsten discussed a dinner held back in 2003 in honor of Khalidi, a critic of Israel and advocate for Palestinian rights.
Barack Obama has denied his close association with Khalidi, too.

According to Wallsten the evening not surprisingly turned into a classic Jew-bash:

"During the dinner a young Palestinian American recited a poem accusing the Israeli government of terrorism in its treatment of Palestinians and sharply criticizing U.S. support of Israel. If Palestinians cannot secure their own land, she said, "then you will never see a day of peace."

One speaker likened "Zionist settlers on the West Bank" to Osama bin Laden, saying both had been "blinded by ideology."
Barack Obama also praised the former PLO operative during the event.
And, Obama confessed that his family often shared dinner with the Khalidis:

His many talks with the Khalidis, Obama said, had been "consistent reminders to me of my own blind spots and my own biases... It's for that reason that I'm hoping that, for many years to come, we continue that conversation -- a conversation that is necessary not just around Mona and Rashid's dinner table," but around "this entire world."

...The event was videotaped, and a copy of the tape was obtained by The Times.
Continue reading

Monday, October 27, 2008

This Week's Jewish Blog Canival

Edition #188 of the Jewish blog carnival Haveil Havalim is featured at What War Zone.

Obama's Birth Certificate Has Been Sealed

Now we know what Obama was really doing in Hawaii under the guise of visiting his supposedly sick grandmother. He was burying forever the truth about his citizenship. Jerome Corsi reports that Hawaii governor Linda Lingle has placed Obama's birth certificate under seal and instructed the state's Department of Health to prevent any member of the press gaining access to it under any circumstances.

It's becoming increasingly clear that this bastard is a fraud who was born in Kenya and therefore is ineligible to be president according to the constitution. It's not even clear whether he's in fact a citizen at all, let alone native born. This man has used every illegal and ruthless method necessary to force his way into power and towards his ultimate goal of taking the White House. From voter fraud, to rigging elections, forcing other candidates off the ballot, suppressing criticism of himself through intimidation tactics and even violating the constitutional requirement to be president. Obama has all the characteristics of some third world dictator. He has no respect for the rule of law or the values of this country. He has no respect for democracy, for free speech, for the constitution. And he believes he is entitled to take power and by force if necessary.

The governor's office officially declined a request made in writing by WND in Hawaii to obtain a copy of the hospital-generated original birth certificate of Barack Obama.

"It does not appear that Dr. Corsi is within any of these categories of persons with a direct and tangible interest in the birth certificate he seeks," wrote Roz Makuala, manager of constituent services in the governor's office, in an e-mailed response to a WND request seeking the information.

Those listed as entitled to obtain a copy of an original birth certificate include the person born, or "registrant" according to the legal description from the governor's office, the spouse or parent of the registrant, a descendant of the registrant, a person having a common ancestor with the registrant, a legal guardian of the registrant, or a person or agency acting on behalf of the registrant.

WND was told the official reason for denial of access to Obama's birth certificate would be authority granted pursuant to Section 338-18 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes, a provision the anonymous source claimed was designed to prevent identity theft.

Still, the source told WND confidentially the motivation for withholding the original birth certificate was political, although the source refused to disclose whether there was any information on the original birth certificate that would prove politically embarrassing to Obama.

Get the book that started it all, Jerome Corsi's "The Obama Nation," autographed by the author, exclusively from WND's online store for the amazing low price of just $4.95.

The source also refused to answer WND's question whether the original document on file with the Department of Health was a hospital-generated birth certificate or a registration of birth that may have been filed subsequent to the birth.

The anonymous source made clear the Hawaii Department of Health would immediately release Obama's original birth certificate, provided Obama requested the document be released, but the Department of Heath has received no such request from the senator or from anyone acting officially on his behalf.

WND also found on microfilm in the Honolulu downtown public library a notice published under the "Births, Marriages, Deaths" section of the Honolulu Sunday Advertiser for August 13, 1961, on page B-6, noting: "Mr. and Mrs. Barack II Obama. 6085 Kalanianaole-Hwy, son, Aug. 4."

In searching through the birth notices of the Honolulu Advertiser for 1961, WND found many birth notices were published between one and two weeks after the date of birth listed.

The notice in the Honolulu Advertiser does not list the hospital where the Obama son was born or the doctor who delivered the baby.

In a startling development, Obama's Kenyan grandmother has reportedly alleged she witnessed Obama's birth at the Coast Provincial Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya.
Read the whole thing

Obama Campaign's Massive Voter Fraud and Stolen Elections

Looking back at the Democratic primary, it seems highly improbable that a candidate can lose CA, TX, FL, NY, PA, OH, MA, NJ, MI and yet win the nomination. Not only did Obama lose these big states to Hillary Clinton, but many of them by wide margins. So how is it that Obama became the party nominee and now stands at the threshold of the presidency? It should be obvious something unseemly occurred inside the Democratic party primaries. In fact something nefarious did take place with the caucuses. Did it not seem odd that Obama defeated Hillary in every caucus state but Nevada, and all by big margins? Isn't it odd that people in rural states where even Democratic voters are largely conservative chose a far left candidate? And how is it that Hillary won the Texas primary but lost the caucus by a pretty big margin? None of this seems probable yet such outcomes have not come into question by the media.

There is proof however that in fact there was a deliberate, premeditated plan to rig the caucuses by the Obama campaign. In this documentary "We Will Not Be Silenced", Hillary Clinton voters provide testimonials to either their personal experience or having witnessed intimidation of elderly women, falsification of documents, changing results in favor of Obama, allowing unregistered people to vote for Obama, stalking and threatening or locking Hillary supporters out of polling places etc. And the Clinton campaign itself issued press releases and a letter claiming widespread voter fraud. And now ACORN with it's massive fraudulent voter registration drive is attempting to steal the general election.

The media by its silence in all of these sinister activities is complicit in the undermining of American democracy and in the hostile and forcible takeover of our republic by far left forces. The Obama mob and its media allies and enablers must be stopped and exposed lest they turn our great country into a banana republic.

Sunday, October 26, 2008

Spreading Myths About Sarah

This creep PZ Myers derides Sarah, claiming she is ignorant and anti-science. First of all, the idea that she is anti-science is another one of those liberal and media generated myths about her, in order to paint her as a far right loon. She is the daughter of a science teacher and has said that evolution should be taught as an acceptable principle. Anyway her lack of expertise of scientific work on fruit flies is a lame and phony justification for not voting for the ticket you had no intention of voting for in the first place. What a jackass. I have yet to be given a definitive answer as to why obama remotely deserves to be president of the United States, from anyone who is voting for him. They have no clue as to why they are voting for him.

A vice president or a president for that matter, doesn't need to be particularly knowledgable about science. It has nothing to do with the presidency. BTW I wonder just what scientific knowledge Hussein Obama acquired as a radical community activist in Chicago?

Myers says we have to choose between 21st century rationalism and Dark Age inanity. And that it should be an easy choice. I couldn't agree more. Therefore I won't cast my vote for the dark age insanity of Islam which Obama and his ilk want to appease.

Check out some of the mutants who have posted comments on that blog. Such as calling a decent woman like Sarah, evil. But hanging around with jeremiah wright, rev. meeks, father pfleger, bill ayers, khalid al mansour, rashid khalidi, frank marshall davis, the nation of islam etc. are not the acts of an evil person? We'll see how much scientific research is conducted when the muslims conquer western civilization. And with someone as weak as nobama gets in, we will be closer to that scenario.

Speaking of education, scientific or otherwise, when Obama was chairman of the CAC, what curriculum did he choose to fund? It wasn't science, math, reading or writing. It was indoctrination into black nationalism and the ills of America. Not surprisingly, Chicago test scores did not increase. But liberals will tell us Palin is bad for education, she will take us back to the dark ages, but Obama supposedly represents enlightenment. Ha!

Saturday, October 25, 2008

Obama Citizenship Suits

Philip Berg's suit challenging Obama's eligibility to be president on the grounds that he was not a natural born American citizen, was thrown out Friday. It was tossed on the grounds that Berg lacked standing, saying any harm from an allegedly ineligible candidate was "too vague and its effects too attenuated to confer standing on any and all voters." By fighting the suit in this manner, not on the merits of Berg's claim, but rather on procedural grounds, the Obama campaign is essentially acknowledging that he in fact is not a natural born U.S. citizen. Otherwise why won't the campaign simply release his original birth certificate? In fact, Berg confirms that he has a recording of Obama's paternal grandmother saying she was in the delivery room in Kenya when Barack was born. Also, Andy Martin's suit in Hawaii was thrown out. It is speculated that is the real reason Obama was in Hawaii, and that visiting his ailing white grandmother was just a cover story. He was going there to bury the evidence about his citizenship. Meanwhile a third suit has been filed in Washington state. Steven Marquis is suing the Secretary of State, Samuel Reed, demanding he verify Obama's eligibility before allowing him on the ballot.

Smearing Sarah

Mik Moore of is circulating this letter smearing Sarah Palin, practically having McCain at deaths door and stoking fear over the prospect of Palin becoming president. Meanwhile as a chief executive, she actually has more experience at the bottom of her ticket than Obama has at the top of his. Here's the letter and my responses to the points made:

President Sarah Palin
By Mik Moore

In the waning days of August, as Sen. Barack Obama and Sen. John McCain were getting ready to accept their party’s nomination for President, each was faced with a decision that would shape their administration: choosing a Vice President.

The U.S. Constitution requires the election of a Vice President to ensure a clear and peaceful succession of office if the President should, for any reason, become unable to serve. This occurs more often than we might think. In the 20th Century, five Vice Presidents assumed the Presidency in this fashion. Four presidents died in office and Richard Nixon resigned. Another two presidents used the position of Vice President as a stepping stone to the Presidency; first Nixon, then George H.W. Bush.

In recent years, the Vice President has taken on additional responsibilities. Our current Vice President, Dick Cheney, is known to have tremendous influence over White House policy.

So in addition to choosing their successor, the nominees for President were making their first selection of a member of their Cabinet, the inner circle of decision makers in any administration.

Sen. Obama chose Sen. Joe Biden as his Vice President, cabinet member, and possible successor. Sen. Biden is among the most highly respected foreign policy experts in the United States , serving as the Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. He is known as tough and often blunt, willing to stand up to dictators like Slobodan Milosevic, whom he called “a war criminal” to his face. Biden’s knowledge of Middle East affairs and his decades of strong support for Israel are well documented.

It’s quite safe to stand up to Milosevic. But would Biden stand up to ahmadenijad? Given that he has been in the pockets of pro-Iranian regime lobbyists, I would think not. And what exactly makes Biden a foreign policy expert when you consider that he has been getting it wrong for three decades. Whether voting against the first Gulf war or opposing the surge in this Iraq war and calling for the partition of Iraq. In the 70’s he opposed giving aid to south Vietman and supported cutoffs that led to the fall of Saigon and the deaths of 2 million. In the 80’s opposed efforts to bring freedom to the people of Nicaragua and El Salvador, and opposed SDI, a missile defense program, the prospect of which caused the fall of the Soviet empire.

Sen. McCain chose Gov. Sarah Palin as his Vice President, cabinet member, and possible successor. Gov. Palin has no foreign policy experience whatsoever. She didn’t even have a passport in 2007 when she was preparing to take a trip to visit troops from Alaska ’s National Guard. She got her start in politics as an ardent anti-choice activist and member of the Alaska Independence Party, which advocates voting on Alaska’s secession from the United States .

She did not belong to the Independence Party. Also the governor of Alaska is routinely briefed on highly classified military issues. Governor Palin has been privy to military and intelligence secrets that not even many senators have access to. You can be rest assured Obama doesn't.

In 1999 she attended a fundraiser for Pat Buchanan who was running for President. The same Pat Buchanan who praised Hitler and blames Jews for turning Congress into “Israeli occupied territory;” the same Pat Buchanan who merits seven separate pages on the Anti-Defamation League’s website. Buchanan has described Palin as a “[pitchfork] brigader for me in 1996, as was her husband. They were at a fundraiser for me. She is a terrific gal.”Like many on the Christian Right, Palin believes that the earth is 6000 years old and has supported the teaching of creationism in the classroom. As the editor of the L.A. Jewish Journal noted, a search for “Palin” in the AIPAC database produces no matches. That is because Palin has no record on Israel, one of many countries she has never visited.

Sarah did not endorse Buchanan, she endorsed Forbes. And she NEVER pushed for teaching creationism in the classroom. She only went so far as to say that students should be allowed to debate both sides.

Among Jews who take seriously American foreign policy generally, and particularly our nation’s approach to the Middle East and Israel , the choice of Sarah Palin is deeply disturbing. At this moment of international crisis and ongoing instability in the Middle East , why would John McCain choose as his successor and running mate a governor with absolutely no background in this area? With the future of Israel hanging in the balance, can we take a chance on John McCain, who chose Sarah Palin despite being told by many of his supporters that the choice was a bad idea?

I take foreign policy very seriously. That’s why I find it deeply disturbing to put in charge a man who only became a U.S. senator less than four years ago, and since he started running for president a year later, he essentially has one year experience on a national level, his entire political career spanning around a decade and prior to that, he was nothing more than a local community activist. Notice how they have to make their case by comparing Obama to the bottom of the GOP ticket, which tells us that they are admitting McCain is far better suited to be president than Obama. And what background in the Middle East does Obama have unless you count his relationship with PLO spokesman Rashid Khalidi and his relationship with Khalid al Mansour who represented Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal.

Palin is also a life-long activist of the Christian Right.. After eight years of a Bush Administration that at times appeared to exist solely to do the bidding of this powerful voting bloc, many Jews shudder at the idea that we could be in for another four years of the same with McCain/Palin. Yet according to the New York Times, McCain felt he had to ask Palin, and not his close friend Sen. Joe Lieberman or former Gov. Tom Ridge, because he feared the wrath of the Christian Right.

This has left us with some important questions to consider. Will McCain serve out his term and not be forced to turn the White House over to President Palin? Will McCain continue to be controlled by the Christian Right? Will McCain’s decision making change once he is elected to take into account the needs other communities, including the Jewish community?

It was obvious that when Barack Obama selected Joe Biden to be Vice President, he placed the interests of the United States and our allies first. Unfortunately, when John McCain selected Sarah Palin to be Vice President, he placed the interests of the Christian Right and their allies first.

Better the Christian right than the Muslim Jihadists who Obama wants to appease. By voting for McCain-Palin, we will be putting the interests of America and our allies first.

A McCain/Palin administration would combine the recklessness of McCain with the inexperience of Palin. It is now very clear that we need the steady hand of Obama/Biden during these challenging times for America , for Israel , and for our other allies abroad.

As opposed to the inexperience and naivete of Obama and the sheer stupidity of Biden who consistently got it wrong on foreign policy as I noted above? The McCain/Palin ticket is the steady experienced hand we need during these challenging times for America and Israel.

Meeting With Dictators

John Dinges on The Huffington Post makes a weak attempt at creating a moral equivalence between McCain and Obama with regard to the issue of meeting unconditionally with dictators. As you know Obama has said he would meet with Iran's Islamist dictator Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. So Dinges argues that in 1985 McCain met unconditionally with Chile's dictator Augusto Pinochet. Dinges seems to think this is a "gotcha" moment. But he overlooks certain differences. Although Pinochet was certainly a bad guy, the major difference is that he was not an enemy of America nor was he threatening to use or even develop nuclear weapons. He didn't sponsor global terrorism. He never threatened to wipe another country off the map either. And finally, Pinochet gave up his power and allowed Chile to return to democratic rule.

The Media's Double Standard

The major media has spent the last few days wasting air time uncovering the "scandal" regarding the cost of Sarah Palin's wardrobe, which has not been funded with taxpayer money, but rather contributions to the campaign. However they have yet to examine the millions in illegal foreign donations to the Obama campaign, whether he is actually a natural born U.S. citizen, Rezko, ACORN voter registration fraud, his ties to khalid al mansour and another radical Muslim in Philly, who owns the building where Obama's campaign headquarters for that city are located. Or how about just what kind of education he funded as chairman of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge. It wasn't reading, writing and arithmetic. It was a radical education in socialism and black separatism. And what about his college records which he refuses to divulge? But we aren't supposed to look too closely into Obama's background.

I have also seen an ad on Yahoo that asks people to take a survey about whether Sarah Palin is experienced enough. Why not ask if Obama is experienced enough? I am so beyond disgusted and frustrated with the hypocrisy and double standards which have permeated this campaign in favor of Obama.

Friday, October 24, 2008

What's Wrong With the American People?

I'm perplexed by polls which show Obama with a wide lead over McCain. This man was a 20 year member of a church which wasn't at all a real Christian church, but one which espoused a doctrine called black liberation theology. A belief system that is anti-American, anti-white and anti-Semitic. You mean to tell me that people actually believe him when he claims that for twenty years he was unaware of what occurred in that church and what belief system it and his pastor held. Or believe that he could have spent all of those years as a member of that church without sharing the same worldview. Could you sit in the pews of a church and listen to a pastor's hateful rants without being appalled and leaving the church immediately? Yet hearing this crap didn't phase Obama for 20 years. In fact he brought his daughters to this church. Is such behavior reflective of a man who supposedly transcends race, who will unify Americans? Or does it reflect a man who has hate in his heart? What is wrong with the American people that they are willing to overlook this and his other ties to extreme leftists and Islamists? Why are people refusing to accept that he shares the views of those he traveled in the same circles with? Americans are definitely not on the left so why would they vote for him unless they actually felt that he did not harbor the ideas of these people. There's Jeremiah Wright, the Reverend Meeks, Father Pfleger, Bill Ayers, Khalid Al Mansour, Rashid Khalidi, Frank Marshall Davis, the nation of Islam. One America-hating, white-hating and Jew-hating extremist after another, people who were his mentors and or who he worked closely with. Is it logical that he doesn't think the same as these people? How stupid are voters? Why are they allowing themselves to be hoodwinked by this guy?


Opportunist Scott McClellan who had a falling out with the Bush adminstration and wrote a tell-all book bashing Bush, has now come out in support of Obama. I don't think this punk actually believes Obama is more suited to be president than McCain is, but his petty squabble with the Bush administration and his need for revenge as well as to sell books, supersede his concern for what is best for the country. So the backstabbing traitor chooses to exact his revenge by harming McCain and America. And he does it with less than two weeks to go in order to get the maximum impact. There are some fools who will be influenced by the fact that a former Bush administration official backs the Democratic candidate. I hope most can see this endorsement for what it is, the act of a greedy vengeful, petty little man.

Obama's Medical Records

As a youth, Barack Hussein Obama was mentored by communist Frank Marshall Davis and spent alot of time alone with him. Davis was a self-professed pedophile. It is quite possible he molested the young Obama. If so, it is also possible that Obama was or is still undergoing therapy as a result, which may explain why he refuses to release his medical records. It has seemed to me for quite sometime, that Obama is not psychologically sound. If he had such experiences with Davis, that may explain his behavior in the back of a limo with Larry Sinclair years ago, if Sinclair is in fact telling the truth. The other three candidates have released all of their medical records as far as I know. Just what is Obama hiding? For that matter what is he hiding about his college records and his birth certificate? This man is asking us to trust him with the highest office in the land where he would be given control over our armed forces, and he is keeping important information about himself a secret. But I blame the media more than him, they won't hold his feet to the fire and the public doesn't seem to care. They are willing to entrust the presidency to a mystery man.

Thursday, October 23, 2008

Obama's Marxist Agenda

The stock market downturn is a generated crisis which will bring Obama to power. I said weeks ago that it is not by chance that the market downturn occured a month before the election and is continuing. I said and I am more convinced than ever that Arab investors along with wealthy leftists like Soros are manipulating the stock market to get Obama in the White House.

Here's an article from last month which reinforces my theory that Obama and his ilk intend to manufacture crises in order to gain power, stay in power and bring about the revolutionary "changes" in the American system they so desire. It is called the Cloward-Piven Strategy to orchestrate political, financial and social chaos in order to hasten the fall of capitalism. ACORN, the organization which Obama represented as its attorney and who also trained its "activists, has used the Cloward-Piven strategy through its fraudulent voter registration drive and its push to force banks to provide risky mortgages to low-income people with poor credit.

When Americans hear Obama speak of change, they naively think he simply means change of policy direction from the Bush administration. They have no clue as to the kind of real fundamental change in the American economic and political system he truly intends. An Obama presidency will result in massive upheaval.

America waits with bated breath while Washington struggles to bring the U.S. economy back from the brink of disaster. But many of those same politicians caused the crisis, and if left to their own devices will do so again.

Despite the mass media news blackout, a series of books, talk radio and the blogosphere have managed to expose Barack Obama's connections to his radical mentors -- Weather Underground bombers William Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, Communist Party member Frank Marshall Davis and others. David Horowitz and his Discover the have also contributed a wealth of information and have noted Obama's radical connections since the beginning.

Yet, no one to my knowledge has yet connected all the dots between Barack Obama and the Radical Left. When seen together, the influences on Obama's life comprise a who's who of the radical leftist movement, and it becomes painfully apparent that not only is Obama a willing participant in that movement, he has spent most of his adult life deeply immersed in it.

But even this doesn't fully describe the extreme nature of this candidate. He can be tied directly to a malevolent overarching strategy that has motivated many, if not all, of the most destructive radical leftist organizations in the United States since the 1960s.
Read the whole thing

Islamist Group Tied to Obama

Barack Hussein Obama's base of operations for Philadelphia is in an area known as an Islamist corridor with the campaign's office housed in a building owned by Kenny Gamble, a Muslim convert who also calls himself Luqman Abdul Haqq. He also holds a senior position in the Muslim Alliance in North America, a group founded by a cop killer and who has among its members, those who came out of the Nation of Islam and Black Panther movements. Gamble favors racial and religious segregation and his aim is to carve out a black Muslim enclave in south Philly. Among those who run MANA include an unindicted co-conspirator in the '93 WTC bombing and who supports sharia punishments and says America must accept the Islamist agenda or be destroyed, another who directs a mosque with ties to terrorism, and one who promotes anti-Semitic and anti-American conspiracy theories and admires hamas, hezbollah and osama bin laden. Just the usual type of individuals who you find in Muslim organizations which the media pretends are merely moderate, civil rights groups.

So, another enemy of America is added to the long list of Obama associations. But please don't dare question his patriotism.

When Barack Obama’s campaign needed a base for harvesting votes from the southern precincts of Philadelphia, it set up shop in a building owned and managed by controversial real estate baron [1] Kenny Gamble. Also known as Luqman Abdul Haqq, Gamble holds a senior position with the Muslim Alliance in North America ([2] MANA), whose founding is [3] traced to a convicted cop-killer and whose [4] leadership is stacked with radicals. He likewise serves as a community organizer of sorts — one who has been accused of slowly transforming his neighborhood into a “[5] black Muslim enclave.”

The office [6] opened on August 21 at 1501 Christian Street, with Gamble himself [7] cutting the ceremonial ribbon. Makeshift [8] banners proclaim it the “South Philly Obama Headquarters,” the address of which is listed on the Obama-Biden website as a [9] field office for the Pennsylvania Campaign for Change. Philadelphia tax records identify Gamble as the owner of the property, while signage indicates that the building is home to [10] Universal Educational Management, part of his [11] Universal Companies conglomerate.

Gamble’s associates and agendas expose him as a dubious figure that politicians seeking to present an image of inclusion would be wise to avoid. This is doubly true for a campaign like Obama’s that already has suffered serious missteps in its interaction with the Muslim community.

Best known for his work in the [12] music business, Gamble has held high-ranking posts with the [13] Muslim Alliance in North America, which focuses on African-American converts to Islam. That description fits Gamble and most of the group’s senior members, some of whom also have roots in the Nation of Islam and Black Panther movement. Indeed, the formation of MANA was [14] inspired by [15] Jamil Al-Amin, the onetime Panther “justice minister” H. Rap Brown. MANA’s enthusiasm for Al-Amin remains untainted in the wake of his [16] conviction for the 2000 murder of a sheriff’s deputy. He has even [17] addressed, by telephone, MANA meetings at Gamble’s [18] United Muslim Masjid.

MANA’s [19] governing bodies teem with Islamists: [20] Siraj Wahhaj, the organization’s amir, was named as a potential [21] unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, supports [22] Sharia-prescribed punishments, and predicts America’s demise unless it “[23] accepts the Islamic agenda.” [24] Johari Abdul-Malik directs outreach activities for a Virginia [25] mosque repeatedly [26] tied to terrorism cases. [27] Abdul Alim Musa promotes anti-Semitic and anti-American [28] conspiracy theories and has [29] expressed admiration for Hamas, Hezbollah, and Osama bin Laden.

Musa’s radical [30] As-Sabiqun group advises Muslims to assemble [31] self-contained strongholds, a strategy similar to what Gamble is pursuing in Philadelphia. As he explained in an [32] interview with Saudi TV, “One of the intentions that we had from the beginning was to create a model, so that, in the coming years, Muslims would be able to live close to each other, that they would live closer to the masjid [mosque], that they would eventually be able to open up businesses so that they would be able to employ each other and develop community life.” More darkly, Philadelphia magazine has [33] reported that some South Philly denizens “fear that Gamble, a convert to Islam, is inclined toward racial and religious segregation” and aims to carve out a “[34] black Muslim enclave.”
Read the rest

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Questioning Obama's Patriotism

Yet another politician has been browbeaten into issuing an apology for rightly calling into question Barrack Hussein Obama's values and patriotism. This time it is Minnesota's Michele Bachmann, who is in a race to retain her congressional seat.

Barack Obama has a long pattern of associating with numerous people who hate America. These were not merely casual acquaintances or people who simply lived in his neighborhood, but people who were his mentors and who he worked closely with to further a common radical agenda. WHAT IS ONE SUPPOSED TO CONCLUDE FROM THAT? I am so sick of people having to issue apologies for simply stating the obvious, given Obama's own history. It is Barack Hussein Obama who should be apologizing to America. He and not his critics should be on the defensive. The onus should be on him to prove the allegations about his patriotism or lack thereof, are untrue.

(Oct. 22) - A Minnesota congressional race has drawn national attention since incumbent Michele Bachmann called Barack Obama's patriotism into question on MSNBC's 'Hardball.'
"I am very concerned that he might have anti-American views," Bachmann said, although she later expressed regret for the remark after initially denying making the comments. Her original comment galvanized Democrats who flooded her opponent with campaign donations.

Powell Condemns "Islamophobia"

As if it wasn't bad enough that Colin Powell endorsed Obama, he also condemned what he called "Islamophobia" in the Republican party. Naturally CAIR is quite pleased with Powell's remarks.

“I’m also troubled by, not what Senator McCain says, but what members of the party say. And it is permitted to be said such things as, ‘Well, you know that Mr. Obama is a Muslim.’ Well, the correct answer is, he is not a Muslim, he’s a Christian. He’s always been a Christian. But the really right answer is, what if he is? Is there something wrong with being a Muslim in this country? The answer’s no, that’s not America. Is there something wrong with some seven-year-old Muslim-American kid believing that he or she could be president? Yet, I have heard senior members of my own party drop the suggestion, ‘He’s a Muslim and he might be associated terrorists.’ This is not the way we should be doing it in America.”

Yes, there is something wrong with being a Muslim in this country, because Islam is not merely a personal faith but a political ideology incompatible with America’s constitution. If a candidate were to be a professed Muslim who supports sharia law, that candidate would not be fit to serve because he or she could not be trusted to uphold their sworn pledge to protect and defend the constitution of the United States of America, since the contitution is at odds with sharia. Islam demands that its adherents be loyal to the Muslim umma, not their respective nations. The onus is on Muslims to prove their loyalty to America, they give us no reason to give them the benefit of the doubt. In fact they provide us every reason to be suspicious of them. It’s ironic that CAIR itself, who insists we not question the loyalty of Muslims, is a group linked to terrorism. If Powell is any indication of how our military and political leaders think, we are in serious trouble.

Taliban Murders British Aid Worker

A British aid worker in Afghanistan was murdered by crazed jihadists because they said she was teaching Christianity. Persecution and murder of Christians in the Muslim world rarely if ever evokes outrage in the west. Compare that to the Muslims who set embassies on fire, rampage and kill over cartoons of their murdering pedophile prophet.

Even though we refuse to acknowledge it, we are at war with Islam. Those who are more dedicated and committed will prevail. It is obvious that the west is indifferent about defending our common values and culture, whereas the jihadis are passionate and committed to forcibly spreading their poisonous, evil doctrine and won’t let up until we submit.

Aid worker Gayle Williams, from the Christian charity Serve Afghanistan, was killed in the capital Kabul.

Taliban spokesman Zabiullah Mujahid said she was shot because she was teaching her religion.

"This woman came to Afghanistan to teach Christianity to the people of Afghanistan," he said.

"Our (leaders) issued a decree to kill this woman. This morning our people killed her in Kabul."

Two gunmen on a motorbike targeted the 34-year-old as she walked to work alone at about 8am local time.

"She was a person who always loved the Afghans and was dedicated to serving those who are disabled," Serve Afghanistan said in a statement.

"Needless to say we are all in shock."

Ms Williams was a joint South African-UK national, Serve Afghanistan said.

Speaking from Kabul, journalist Jerome Starkey told Sky News that Ms Williams had previously been working in Kandahar but had been brought back to Kabul because it was thought to be safer.

Taliban insurgents have increasingly targeted aid workers this year in their campaign to spread an atmosphere of fear and undermine security in Afghanistan.

A total of 30 aid workers were killed during the first seven months of 2008 and 92 were abducted, according to the United Nations.

Meanwhile, a senior Nato officer has told Sky News a lack of "political will"is hampering development.

General John Craddock said not enough Nato countries were contributing troops.

Sick of the Bias

Once again the vipers in the msm have the McCain-Palin ticket on the defensive. Palin is apologizing for correctly contrasting the 'real America' from those areas which are not patriotic. It's bizarre that decent Americans like Sarah Palin who represent the real America and our values are derided and demonized and yet Hussein Obama who befriended all sorts of enemies of America never has to apologize and is never on the defensive. Sarah has nothing to apologize for. Obama on the other hand should be the one to apologize.

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

Media Vipers

These bastards in the major media outlets will not bother to investigate things such as Hussein Obama's foreign campaign contributions or whether or not he is actually a natural born American citizen, his dealings with Rezko or his ties to Kenyan Islamist thug Raila Odinga etc., but they will be sure to let us know that Sarah Palin used state funds for her children's travels. This insignificant story is treated as breaking news with blaring headlines. The msm is no different than Pravda. Let them all rot in hell. Let's defy them by electing McCain and send them a strong message that their attempt at manipulating and bullying the American people have failed.

Biden Makes the Case for McCain

Joe Biden makes the case for electing John McCain:

"Mark my words," the Democratic vice presidential nominee warned at the second of his two Seattle fundraisers Sunday. "It will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama like they did John Kennedy. The world is looking. We're about to elect a brilliant 47-year-old senator president of the United States of America. Remember I said it standing here if you don't remember anything else I said. Watch, we're gonna have an international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the mettle of this guy."

"I can give you at least four or five scenarios from where it might originate," Biden said to Emerald City supporters, mentioning the Middle East and Russia as possibilities. "And he's gonna need help. And the kind of help he's gonna need is, he's gonna need you - not financially to help him - we're gonna need you to use your influence, your influence within the community, to stand with him. Because it's not gonna be apparent initially, it's not gonna be apparent that we're right."

Do we want a novice like Obama in the White House when terrorists test the new president? Here Biden is admitting that our enemies will take advantage of Obama's inexperience and naivete. Thanks to Biden for pointing this out to the American voters.

Obama Raised Money for Kenyan Thug

Not only has Obama accepted contributions possibly from foreign enemies, he has also contributed money to a foreign enemy thug, the pro-Islamist Raila Odinga of Kenya. Odinga made a pact with an Islamist organization to institute sharia law, protect terrorists and persecute Christians. Obama has the distinction of being in the same company with the son of Libya's dictator, Muammar Gadhafi, as being among the biggest contributors to Odinga's campaign. Nearly $1 million was donated to Odinga's presidential run by "Friends of Senator B.O.".

NEW YORK – Sen. Barack Obama, with a donation of nearly $1 million, and a son of Libyan dictator Muammar Gadhafi were among the biggest contributors to the presidential campaign of controversial Kenyan leader Raila Odinga, according to an internal document obtained by WND.

The memo was prepared by the head of Odinga's campaign finance accounting section, Shakeel Shabbir, as an official report delivered to the national treasurer for Odinga's Orange Democratic Movement party, or ODM.

Among the 72 individuals and organizations that contributed money to Odinga's 2007 presidential run in Kenya, Shabbir lists "Friends of Senator B.O." as having donated 66,000,000 Kenyan schillings, about $950,000.

Saif el-Islam Gadhafi, the Libyan strongman's second oldest son, reportedly donated 53,450,000 Kenyan schillings, about $765,000.

According to several highly credible ex-ODM sources WND interviewed in Kenya, the $950,000 raised for Odinga's campaign came from a series of private meetings arranged for Odinga by Mark Lippert, a foreign policy adviser in Obama's U.S. Senate office. The meetings with top-dollar Obama fundraisers and donors took place during Odinga's 2006 trip to the U.S.

In Kenya, WND talked to several top ex-ODM officials who played key roles in Odinga's 2007 presidential campaign.

The officials became disaffected with Odinga after confirming he signed a memorandum of understanding with Sheik Abdullahi Abdi, the chairman of the National Muslim Leaders Forum, or NAMLEF. In the Aug, 27, 2007, agreement, Odinga promised that within six months of becoming president, he would "rewrite the Constitution of Kenya to recognize Shariah as the only true law sanctioned by the Holy Quran for Muslim declared religions."

The ex-Odinga officials also told WND that, as Christians, they were appalled to see Odinga use tribal violence as a strategy to gain power after he lost the election by some 250,000 votes to sitting President Mwai Kibaki, a member of Kenya's majority Kikuyu tribe.

Foreign Donations to Obama

The unusually large number of contributions to Obama's campaign in unrounded amounts is speculated to be the result of conversions from foreign currency. Foreign donations to our campaigns are of course, illegal. Also, numerous donors have contributed beyond the $4600 federal election limit. The Obama campaign claims many of these contributions have been returned, but donors say they haven't been refunded. Just as with every other untoward, illegal or unethical thing this candidate has done, he can also break campaign finance laws with impunity. I suppose it would be racist to question where these funds are coming from and from who. Our media isn't interested in finding out.

As Barack Obama reaped a stunning $150 million in campaign donations in September, bringing his total to more than $600 million, new questions have arisen about the source of his amazing funding.

By Obama’s own admission, more than half of his contributions have come from small donors giving $200 or less. But unlike John McCain’s campaign, Obama won’t release the names of these donors.

A Newsmax canvass of disclosed Obama campaign donors shows worrisome anomalies, including outright violations of federal election laws.

For example, Obama has numerous donors who have contributed well over the $4,600 federal election limit.

Many of these donors have never been contacted by the Obama campaign to refund the excess amounts to them.

And more than 37,000 Obama donations appear to be conversions of foreign currency.

According to a Newsmax analysis of the Obama campaign data before the latest figures were released, potential foreign currency donations could range anywhere from $12.8 million to a stunning $63 million in all. With the addition of $150 million raised in September, this amount could be much more.

When asked by Newsmax about excess contributions, Obama spokesman Ben LaBolt said that contributions already identified as excess had been returned and that those the campaign was just learning about -- either through news accounts or from the Federal Election Commission -- “will be returned.”

“Every campaign faces the challenge of screening and reviewing its contributions,” LaBolt said. “And we have been aggressive about taking every available step to make sure our contributions are appropriate, updating our systems when necessary.”

But many of the donors Newsmax canvassed said they had “never” been contacted by the Obama campaign or seen any refunds, even though their contributions went over the limit months ago.

In all, Newsmax found more than 2,000 donors who had contributed in excess of the $4,600 limit for individuals per election cycle.

Such donations, if not returned within 60 days, are a clear violation of federal campaign finance laws.
Read the rest

The Media is an Enemy of America

In the waning days of the campaign the media is increasingly ratcheting up the race card in a final effort to push their guy, Hussein Obama across the finish line. The strategy is to either guilt or scare whites into voting for Obama lest they be considered "racist", or should McCain win, they will explain it away as racism. This is why I have such contempt for the msm. These elitist scoundrels hate ordinary Americans, they despise those white working and middle class Americans in what they refer to as "fly over" territory who they consider to be "bitter" gun-toting, bible-thumpers. This is why they hold Sarah Palin in such contempt, because they are who she represents.

It is legitimate to bring up Obama's radical anti-American, anti-white and anti-Semitic associations. But the Obama campaign and its media allies are turning reality on its head by portraying anyone who would be concerned about the hatemongers associated with Obama, as haters themselves. Orwell's nightmare has become reality. Meanwhile all the truly hate-filled attacks are coming from the Obama camp and its crazed followers. Most notably toward white women.

Monday, October 20, 2008

Media Bias

This is how repugnant the New York Times is. They have investigative reporters out in Arizona searching for dirt about Cindy McCain, specifically her past addiction to legal prescription drugs. Meanwhile the Times refuses to do any probing of Barack Hussein Obama's past, either of his personal or public life, and those who dare discuss it are dismissed as racist by Obama's media allies. How about investigating Obama's past use of cocaine or his sexual activities, especially a certain incident in the back of a limousine with a man. Cindy McCain's lawyer has written a letter to the NYTimes pleading for fairness.

Speaking of extreme media bias, the msm has done more investigating of the life of Joe the plumber than it has about Obama, a man asking that we entrust him with the highest office in the land, a man who would be commander-in-chief of our armed forces. And the reason they are going after him is that his question to Obama regarding taxes exposed Obama's true socialist agenda when he let it slip that he wants to raise taxes in order to spread the wealth. This is how the Obama campaign and its media allies treat anyone who may present even a tiny obstacle in his path to the presidency or anyone who dares to expose the true Obama.

Sunday, October 19, 2008

Putting Race Before Country

I'm not surprised but I am disappointed that Colin Powell has endorsed Obama. Unfortunately he has chosen to put race before country. And yes, race is purely what is motivating Powell, despite whatever BS spin he tries to sell the public to justify his endorsement of this bum. Neither he nor anyone can honestly say that Barack Hussein Obama, elected to the U.S. senate just four years ago, who's entire political career spans maybe about a decade, and prior to that was nothing but a local community activist, is more qualified for the highest office in the land than John McCain. McCain, having served more than two decades in the senate and who had been a naval aviator and POW in Vietnam. No one can tell me with a straight face that Obama is more fit to be commander and chief than McCain. Obama wasn't even as qualified as those he ran against in the primary.

I was foolish to believe for years that Colin Powell was a man of high character, honor and integrity who would always put country first. After all, he was a career military officer. However all that he has done for his country in the past is offset by his placing this country in danger with his endorsement of Obama. Most Americans respect Powell and this may even influence many independent undecideds. Powell knew who he was going to support in this election a long time ago and he purposely waited until two weeks before election day to make his public endorsement in order for it to have the greatest impact.

If Powell didn't agree with the Bush administration about the Iraq war, he should have stepped down from his post then. That's what someone of integrity would have done. He chose instead to make that presentation to the UN on behalf of the administration although he obviously opposed the war. He ought to accept responsibility for his decisions. But no he chooses instead to take revenge against those who "made" him do it. It seems to me besides the racial issue he may just want to stick it to the GOP. I lost whatever respect I had for Powell in the past.

It turns out the Iraq war was the correct thing to do and we appear to be winning since the surge. Had Bush used that strategy in the beginning, the war may have ended quickly and we would not now be on the verge of the White House being taken over be the radical left.

Blog Carnival

Edition #187 of the Jewish blog carnival Haveil Havalim is featured at Ill call Baila

Former Muslims Opposing Sharia

While clueless dhimmis in Britain and elsewhere in the west advocate instituting some forms of sharia law, those who have actually experienced life under sharia and understand just how brutal and misogynist it is, are fighting to stop its implementation in Britain. At a meeting of the Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain, sharia was referred to as 'racist' and 'backward'. These liberals in the west think that they are somehow showing how "enlightened" and tolerant they are by accepting into their midst an alien culture that is intolerant and unenlightened, and they fail to see the irony in it. And they obviously don't care about the suffering of women and girls in Islamic communities. The left presents a grave danger to the rights and safety of women and girls, given its alliance with Islamists.

London ( – Sweeping legal challenges must be made against the creeping introduction of Islamic law (shari’a) in the United Kingdom, the head of a new body of former Muslims said here Friday.

The Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain, a group bringing together former adherents of the Islamic faith as well as humanists, held its first international conference in London. Several speakers decried the rise of what they called “political Islam” across Europe.

In Britain, Muslims increasingly and controversially have turned to religious courts to decide civil matters under religious law.

Since 2006, the largest such body, the Islamic Shari’a Council in east London, says it has handled around 1,000 cases, mostly dealing with divorce.

While most shari’a courts have no binding legal authority, a growing network of arbitration panels applying Islamic law have been set up around Britain since 2007, and their decisions can be enforced by regular British courts.

Proponents of shari’a courts argue that they help preserve the Muslim identity of a minority community and create a protective environment for young and old alike.

Members of the Islamic Shari’a Council said earlier this year that the vast majority of their cases deal with getting women out of marriages that have gone bad, thus enabling them to remarry under Islamic law.

“We try to reconcile, but in cases where a marriage was enforced on a girl against her wishes, against her own opinion, we don’t want to negotiate,” council president Maulana Abu Sayeed said at the time.

Archbishop Rowan Williams, head of the Church of England, was sharply criticized in February for suggesting that the establishment of shari’a in Britain was “unavoidable.”

However, Sadiq Khan, the recently-appointed government minister for “community cohesion,” told The Times of London last week that the Muslim community in Britain was not “advanced enough” to have its own system of courts.

Such courts could also enforce a system of discrimination against women, said Khan, who is himself a Muslim.

Saturday, October 18, 2008

How Obama Inspires His Followers

I find it rather interesting that a candidate who has campaigned on the slogan of "hope and change" and other such fuzzy, feel-good sentiments, brings out the absolute ugliest venom in his followers. Another Obama follower, obviously inspired by his message of hope, expresses himself by attacking a middle aged, bespectacled female McCain campaign volunteer in New York City. Enraged by the sight of the volunteer holding up a McCain sign in midtown Manhattan, the lunatic Obama cultist grabbed the sign, broke the wooden stick the sign held and then struck her in the face with it. What is it about so many male Obama followers that causes them to verbally and physically abuse women especially, and older women in particular? We've witnessed horrible treatment of women throughout this campaign by the Obama camp. Such enlightened, tolerant and peaceful liberals, aren't they?

While the Democrat-leaning media continues to scare undecided voters with bedtime stories about some mythical angry McCain supporter whom nobody has seen, here is a real district attorney’s complaint documenting an unprovoked assault by an enraged Democrat against a McCain volunteer in midtown Manhattan: “Defendant grabbed the sign [informant] was holding, broke the wood stick that was attached to it, and then struck informant in informant’s face thereby causing informant to sustain redness, swelling, and bruising to informant’s face and further causing informant to sustain substantial pain.”

The names have been redacted out of respect for people’s privacy

The overly formal document doesn’t mention this important detail: the victim was a small, quiet, middle-aged woman wearing glasses, and the attacker was a loud, angry man who went into orbit at the mere sight of McCain campaign signs.

On a Monday afternoon, September 15, 2008, three McCain volunteers were holding campaign signs and distributing leaflets on a busy corner of 51st Street and Lexington Avenue. As they were peacefully talking to each other, they were approached by a man who, in the words of the victim, provided the impression of “a rather benign, doughy-looking guy — not a person I would have expected to assault me.”

He rushed towards them, grabbed a McCain sign off a volunteer’s hands, and tore it apart. That didn’t seem enough.
Read the rest

Islam's Assault on Our Freedom

The Organization of Islamic States is attempting an assault on the sovereignty and freedom of the west. Through its control of the United Nations, this islamosupremacist organization is presenting a resolution against "defamation of religion", the purpose of which is to create an international law to criminalize criticism of Islam while at the same time Muslims are free to continue inciting hatred and violence against non-Muslims. Muslims would of course not be subjected to criminal penalties for spewing hatred against kafirs in their mosques, schools and media. So this Orwellian sounding resolution against "defamation of religion" is a one way street, as is always the case with Muslims.

Theoretically, citizens of free nations who speak out against Islam in their own countries can be charged in the courts of Muslim nations. That could only happen if their governments actually handed them over to those countries, which of course is not going to happen, at least not in the near future. However those being charged would have to be careful about traveling abroad because there might be countries willing to extradite them. Just this past summer, a Jordanian court summoned twelve Europeans on criminal charges of blasphemy, including Geert Wilders and the editors of the newspapers which published the Mohammad cartoons.

Have you seen the little old lady who passes out Jehovah’s Witness literature in your neighborhood? Some people stop and show interest. Others roll their eyes, and keep walking. But, would you ever expect anyone to threaten her? Call her a racist, and try to get her arrested?

Islamists would. And that is exactly what happened to two English Christian ministers who had the nerve to proselytize on a street corner in a predominantly Muslim immigrant area in the UK in 2007.

Such freedom of speech violations won’t be an anomaly if the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC), which has a permanent delegation to the United Nations, succeeds in passing a UN resolution against “Defamation of Religion.” Nobody in a western country will be able to discuss the socio-political consequences of Muslim immigration, for fear of being labeled “Islamophobic” and slapped with a fine, or even jail time.

Islamists are increasingly using lawful Islamism, or non-violent and legal strategies to spread Sharia, (Islamic law) in the West, encroaching on non-Muslim life everyday. Other examples include:
Sharia Finance;
Islam in public schools;
Violations of basic hygiene policy by Muslim medical staff;
Workplace violations in the name of religious freedom;
Censorship of literature.

Under the banner of “religious freedom,” Islamists attack the very fabric of democracy in favor of Islam in the public sphere. The above examples are not examples of pluralism, but a violation of the separation of church and state doctrine meant to keep people of all faiths, or no faith, equal under the law. Liberals have forgotten that secularism is not a free-for-all, but has boundaries in order to remain meaningful.
Continue the article

It should make no difference if this farce of a resolution does pass. All free nations need only ignore it, and not give it, the OIC or the UN any legitimacy through compliance. Free societies must refuse to abide by rules put forth by tyrannical savages.

Friday, October 17, 2008

Leftist Rage at McCain-Palin

While the msm pretends that it's McCain/Palin supporters who are responsible for whipping up violent rage, the reality is Obama followers resemble hitlers brownshirts, threatening, intimidating and menacing anyone who dares not to support their messiah. It's ironic how followers of a candidate campaigning on hope are so vile, nasty, vicious and hateful. It is also ironic that it is "liberals" who in this election year have been the ones who have set back women's equality and revealed just how brutally misogynistic they really are, between their disgusting sexist attacks on Hillary Clinton and now Sarah Palin.

Michelle Malkin:

Last month on the Upper West Side of Manhattan, a small, brave contingent of McCain supporters marched through the streets with campaign signs. They were met by a menacing horde of New Yorkers who displayed their disapproval with a barrage of jeers and vulgar gestures. ("The number of middle fingers in the 'progressive crowd' is directly proportional to the number of Ph.D. degrees in the 10-block radius," one of the witnesses wryly observed.) A YouTube video of the confrontation now has nearly half a million views ( and search "Pro-McCain March in Manhattan"). But don't expect to find it on the nightly news. It doesn't fit the Angry Right narrative.

Neither does the near-riotous reaction of Obama supporters to a McCain-Palin sign in Democrat-dominated Prince George's County, Md. Buried in a back local section, The Washington Post reported this week that "pandemonium" broke loose when an unsuspecting businessman erected a "Country First. McCain/Palin." message on the marquee at his Colony South Hotel & Conference Center.

"Operators of neighborhood e-mail group lists cried foul to their memberships. The NAACP logged calls. Community leaders demanded boycotts of the hotel, a common venue for Democratic events," the little-noticed article reported. A black professor called the sign "a stink bomb in the middle of the living room" of Obama land. The poor hotel manager, Alan Vahabzadeh, surrendered. "I didn't even realize it was going to be like this."

Can't blame him for missing the fiery hint from Portland, Ore. -- where two deranged vandals were arrested after throwing a Molotov cocktail at a McCain yard sign in the middle of the night. Nope, that didn't make it into the columns of Rich, Dionne or Krugman. Doesn't fit the Angry Right narrative.

Speaking of "violent escalation of rhetoric" you never hear about:

Obama supporters in Philadelphia sported "Sarah Palin is a [disgusting vulgarism referring to female genitalia]" T-shirts and yelled, "Let's stone her, old school" over the weekend.

The taliban would be so proud.

An Internet artist has designated Palin an "M.I.L.P." -- "Mother I'd Like to Punch" -- and published a drawing of a man's fist knocking a tooth out of the Alaska governor's mouth and the glasses off her face

"ABORT Palin" graffiti has sprouted on the sidewalks of Seattle, and "Abort Sarah Palin" bumper stickers are spreading in Web stores.

-- Palin-bashing Madonna performs before an audience of thousands, screeching and threatening to "kick her a**."

-- Getty Images publishes a photo of a man pointing a fake gun at the head of a cardboard cutout of Palin on display at the Brooklyn Waterfront Artists Coalition building.

And no one blinks. Not a peep from the Obamedia.

I had high hopes after McCain chose Palin. Initially her presence gave him a big boost in the polls, the public seemed to like her. But then upon Sarah becoming an increasing threat to his prospects for getting into the White House, the Hussein Obama campaign cutthroats, along with their hordes of angry followers and media allies, began a strategy of tearing her down in the ugliest, sexist manner. Obama has a history of bulldozing anyone who becomes an obstacle in his path to power. Just ask Alice Palmer and the other candidates who challenged him in his run for the Illinois state senate. Obama had them all removed from the ballot and ran unopposed. This behavior represents stalinism, not American democracy.

Thursday, October 16, 2008

Obama Says ACORN Will Shape his Agenda

At a forum last year, Obama tells ACORN that they will have a role in shaping policy in an Obama administration. This same group which is responsible for massive voter fraud around the nation and had a role in creating the current financial crisis by intimidating banks as well as lobbying congress to mandate banks into lowering their credit standards so that unqualified people could receive mortgages. ACORN is nothing but a criminal enterprise. It's members should be in prison, not taking the reigns of power in the White House. God help America if their marxist "vision" becomes a reality.

Obama's Citizenship

If true, this would be a bombshell proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that Barack Hussein Obama is not eligible to be president of the United States. Philip Berg has filed a motion to the court which states Obama's place of birth was at Coast Provincial General Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya. And if he was born in Kenya and didn't become a naturalized citizen since the age of 18, he would not be a U.S. citizen at all, let alone natural born. If this is true then Obama was also not legally entitled to hold the office of U.S. senator and Illinois state senator.
Barack Hussein Obama II

By Judah Benjamin, Guest Author

It has been asserted by a number of sources, including Andy Martin, that Barack Hussein Obama was born in Mombasa, Kenya and not in Hawaii. Philip Berg’s Latest Motion to the Court is more explicit since it gives an exact Place of Birth. I must assume that Berg did not simply pluck the Location out of thin air, Mombasa has more than one Hospital, though Coast Provincial General was the best in 1961.

British Birth Certificates have a Standard Format which has been more or less the same since 1837 and they can only be challenged in a British Court. Kenyan Law is explicit and can only be challenged in a Kenyan Court. Indonesian Law is explicit and can only be challenged in an Indonesian Court. Be clear, if Obama was born in Kenya this is not simply a matter for the US Courts, or US Law.

If he was born in Kenya, and his parents were Legally Married [which on the Preponderance of Evidence they were, his father's first "Marriage" being a Tribal, or Village, Marriage, which was not Legally Recognized] due to the age of his mother he would NOT have been a US Citizen. The Immigration and Nationality Act 1952, 8 U.S.C. 1401. Sec. 301 (g) [Effective November 14, 1986] does not apply, nor does Title III, Immigration and Nationality Act Section 309. [8 U.S.C. 1409].

Unless he has taken the Oath of Allegiance as a Naturalized Citizen since he was 18 years old, and if he was born in Mombasa, Kenya, Barack Hussein Obama II would not be a US Citizen, period. The issue of whether or not he was Natural Born under Article II of the Constitution of the United States would cease to matter and he would need to be Deported as an Illegal Alien.

Impeachment as a Senator would seem not to be necessary since he would never Legally have been one, but Diane Feinstein and the members of the Senate Ethics and Rules Committee would be liable to Impeachment. So would their opposite numbers in the Illinois Senate and the appropriate officials of the Illinois State Supreme Court and Bar, so far as I can see.

If Senator Barack Hussein Obama II was born in The Coast Provincial General Hospital at Mombasa in Kenya at 7.24 PM on August 4th 1961, or at any other time, he is not a Natural Born Citizen of these United States and he never was. Philip J Berg, Esq, is correct, under the Nationality Act of 1940, as Revised June 1952 and in accord with United States of America vs Cervantes-Nava 281 F 3d 501 (2002) and Drozd vs INS, 155 F 3d 81, 85-88 (2d Circuit 1998) Senator Barack Hussein Obama II would not ever have been a Legal US Citizen at all, unless he was Naturalized.

If he was born in The Coast Provincial General Hospital at Mombasa in Kenya any Certificate, or Certification of Live Birth, issued for him by the State of Hawaii is a Fraudulent and Illegal Document. At Birth he would have been a UK and Colonies Citizen and in accord with the Kenyan Constitution he would have become a Kenyan Citizen in December 1963. He would not have been a US Citizen.

Alternatively, his UK and Colonies Birth Certificate issued in Mombasa in August 1961 could be a Fraudulent and Illegal Document. The two BCs would need to be compared. By this I mean the Original Vault Copy of the Hawaiian Birth Certificate and not the Amended, Post Adoption, Copy, Legally available to the Senator, assuming he was, as indicated by the Preponderance of Evidence, Adopted by Lolo Soetoro. This case might also need to go through the UK and Kenyan Courts and becomes a Matter of International Law and Controversy.

If Barack Hussein Obama II was born at The Coast Provincial General Hospital at Mombasa in Kenya at 7:24 PM on August 4th 1961, or at any other time, it is certain that he is not Eligible to hold the Offices of POTUS or VPOTUS and highly probable that he is not Legally entitled to hold the Office of Senator either and that he was not Eligible to be an Illinois State Senator.

In that event the Senate Ethics and Rules Committee, Chair Diane Feinstein, have a problem because they are responsible for the Certification of a Candidate’s Compliance with Constitutional Requirements, a job they would have conspicuously failed to do. Should he be Elected the poisoned Chalice would pass to Nancy Pelosi because as Speaker of the House she, and the House, have the Responsibility to ensure that the President Elect can Effectively be Sworn In and Legally Assume the Office and Duties of the President.
Read the whole thing

The Democrats do not care about the constitution or this country, they only want their guy in the White House and believe in winning at any cost, even if it means violating the constitution. Not only would Obama deserve to be impeached so too should Feinstein and Pelosi be removed from office if this story turns out to be true. If he gets elected and it is proven he is not a U.S. citizen, we will then have a serious constitutional crisis on our hands. This is all thanks to the DNC which pushed Obama through to the nomination without vetting him.