Wednesday, September 16, 2009

HRW Suspends Garlasco

Finally HRW has suspended Marc Garlasco. Let's just call Marc Garlasco what he truly is, an anti-Semite. That fact is more than obvious when you combine the double standard he applies to the IDF in condemning their military operations compared to his rightful defense of the US military under the same circumstances, and now the revelations about his nazi paraphernalia collection.

Nazi Fetishist Suspended by HRW

Human Rights Watch's weapons "expert" suspended following outcry over bizarre "hobby".


Last week we reported on the outing of Human Rights Watch's Marc Garlasco as a collector of Nazi memorabilia. To recall, Garlasco has appeared regularly in the media, touted as a military "expert". Garlasco played a prominent role in promoting the 2006 Gaza Beach Libel, which wrongly blamed Israel for a "massacre" of Palestinians. (See HonestReporting's interactive Big Lies presentation for more on this story.)

Initially, HRW used every means available to defend Garlasco, including, as revealed by Harry's Place blog, resorting to creating a fake "activist" with a Middle Eastern sounding name to post comments defending Garlasco on various blog sites.

Mark Gardner of the CST blog addresses HRW's response, which involved attacking Jewish and pro-Israel organizations rather than the very legitimate concerns arising from Garlasco's collecting of Nazi memorabilia.

Garlasco himself wrote a piece for The Huffington Post defending his bizarre "hobby". Even associates of HRW, however, such as Helena Cobban, who sits on HRW's Middle East advisory board have been suitably disturbed.

HRW has finally succumbed to pressure by suspending Garlasco (pictured here wearing a Nazi-themed sweatshirt) with pay "pending an investigation," according to HRW's associate director Caroll Bogert. "We have questions about whether we have learned everything we need to know," she said.
Continued

1 comments:

NormanF said...

Without going into the question of Garlasco's views about Jews, does he meet the standards of professionalism and integrity that should be expected of an expert working for an NGO? Well, he's failed that test. And in only suspending him, HRW is still tone deaf and still doesn't grasp why their employee is a liability to both their mission and their organization's image.