Saturday, January 31, 2009

Jews Under Siege In Europe

In another sign that Jews in Europe are under siege, ex-soldiers are being hired by Jewish schools across Britain to protect their students from muslims. Classrooms are being swept for bombs and visitors searched for weapons. This is also a further sign of the demise of British civilization. The inmates are running the asylum. Instead of forcing innocent children and all civilized people to live their lives constantly besieged, England ought to consider throwing the savages out of their country so that normal human beings can conduct their lives in a normal fashion without needing the protection of armed guards at all times. I'm certain that the islamic schools don't need military guards to protect their kids. It's bizarre that the native population in England are essentially foreigners in their own country while the hostile invaders are perfectly safe and free to do as they please. In a sense, England is currently under islamic occupation.
25 January 2009
Ex-soldier guard for Jew pupils
By Russell Myers
Jewish schools across Britain are hiring elite former soldiers to protect pupils from Islamic extremists following Israel's invasion of Gaza.

Classrooms are being swept for bombs and visitors searched for weapons after Hamas said Jewish children are legitimate targets.

A staff member at North West London Jewish Day School said the premises now resembles a military barracks. He added: "Many of the security staff served in armies in specialist units."

Phaivish Pink, head at Manchester Jewish Grammar School, said: "Like most other schools we've taken steps to ensure pupils, staff and visitors are safe."

The FBI Dumps CAIR

The FBI finally wises up and cuts its ties with the hamas front group CAIR, an un-indicted co-conspirator in the holy land foundation trial. The media loves to depict CAIR as “moderate”, as nothing more than a muslim civil rights group. Some have bought into the idea of CAIR as moderate simply because the group has said it opposes terrorism. I would take these proclamations with a grain of salt. When muslims say they oppose killing innocents, they have quite a different definition than we do about who is innocent. And when asked specifically if they believe hamas and hezbollah are terrorist groups, they will not say so. They will talk around it, avoid giving a straight answer. Anyone who doesn’t believe that the genocidal hamas and hezbollah are terrorist groups, is a virulent anti-Semite. I don’t care how moderate they may appear.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has cut off contacts with the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) amid mounting concern about the Muslim advocacy group's roots in a Hamas-support network, the Investigative Project on Terrorism has learned.

The decision to end contacts with CAIR was made quietly last summer as federal prosecutors prepared for a second trial of the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development (HLF), an Islamic charity accused of providing money and political support to the terrorist group Hamas, according to people with knowledge of the matter.

CAIR and its chairman emeritus, Omar Ahmad, were named un-indicted co-conspirators in the HLF case. Both Ahmad and CAIR's current national executive director, Nihad Awad, were revealed on government wiretaps as having been active participants in early Hamas-related organizational meetings in the United States. During testimony, FBI agent Lara Burns described CAIR as a front organization.

Hamas is a US-designated foreign terrorist organization, and it's been illegal since 1995 to provide support to it within the United States.

The decision to end contacts with CAIR is a significant policy change for the FBI. For years, the FBI worked with the national organization and its state chapters to address Muslim community concerns about the potential for hate crimes and other civil liberty violations in the wake of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.

But critics said the FBI improperly conferred legitimacy on CAIR by meeting with its officials, even as its own investigative files contained evidence of CAIR leaders' ties to Hamas.
Continue reading

Friday, January 30, 2009

Islam is the Dark

"The Third Jihad" is a must-see video by Zuhdi Jasser, a rare moderate muslim who courageously speaks out publicly against terrorism. He warns us about the true agenda of muslims and the dangers we face with its growing population in this country. Also featured is some graphic video of extreme violence committed in the name of islam. Life under islamic rule is hell on Earth for millions. Unfortunately the ones who need to see this shocking video, liberals, will not bother as they prefer to live in their little fantasy world where islam is a peaceful religion. This would be like cold water in the face for them.

Turkish Anti-Semitism

Israel needs to finally get the message that Turkey is an enemy, with virulent anti-Semitism on full display from its current islamist government and ordinary citizens alike. Turkey's small Jewish community is increasingly endangered.

Erdogan blasted Israel throughout the fighting, called on it to be barred from the UN, accused it of using white phosphorus against Gaza civilians and charged it with other "inhuman actions which would bring it to self-destruction. Allah will sooner or later punish those who transgress the rights of innocents."


Yet during the fighting, Erdogan "did not utter one word that placed even one percent of the responsibility for the conflict on Hamas," said the Israeli official. "He has utterly adopted the Hamas narrative."

One example cited by the official of Erdogan's alleged encouragement of anti-Semitic sentiments came in a January 13 speech to Turkey's parliament in which, moments after he claimed to oppose anti-Semitism, Erdogan accused Jews of controlling the media and intentionally targeting civilians.

"Media outlets supported by Jews are disseminating false reports on what happens in Gaza, finding unfounded excuses to justify targeting of schools, mosques and hospitals," Erdogan charged.

The community, estimated to number some 26,000, has seen a spate of anti-Semitic incidents in the wake of Israel's operation against Hamas.

At anti-Israel demonstrations throughout the country, demonstrators were seen carrying blatantly anti-Semitic signs. At a demonstration in the industrial city of Eskisehir, for example, signs read, "Dogs allowed, but no Jews or Armenians."

Posters placed on billboards throughout Istanbul showed bloodied children from Gaza, and addressed Jews directly, calling them "no sons of Moses."

An Istanbul newspaper published a caricature this week showing Hitler flying an Israel Air Force jet, while another called for the expulsion of Turkey's chief rabbi and claimed the Torah permitted Jews to murder their own parents.

So much for the long held fallacy that Turkey is a "moderate" muslim country.

England Caves in to Barbarism

What is it in the character of modern day England and the whole of Europe for that matter which makes them prefer submitting to islam and losing their national and cultural identities, their freedom and democracy, rather than resist the onslaught of islamization?

A member of the House of Lords had invited Geert Wilders to a private meeting and also invited her colleagues to a private viewing of Wilders' film "Fitna", followed by discussion and debate as a normal, civilized democracy does. But then in steps a muslim member of the House of Lords, threatening to send 10,000 muslims to physically prevent Wilders from entering the House. So now the screening of "Fitna" has been cancelled. This is what happens when you let muslims into the government. This is what happens when you welcome millions of people from a primitive, tribal and barbaric culture which abhors freedom and democracy, inside your borders. Take heed America, this is what is coming to our shores if we don't stop it now. Sadly, Britain is already lost, what is happening to that country will not be undone. But perhaps this is what they deserve. Winston Churchill must be rolling over in his grave, along with those who came before him.

Lord Ahmed is a repugnant individual. Not only in appearance, but in association, character and morality. And to hear that he has threatened jihad on the House of Lords if their lordships should fail to meet his demands only serves to intensify Cranmer’s loathing of the man.

It appears that a member of the House of Lords had invited the Dutch politician, Geert Wilders, to a private meeting in the Palace of Westminster. She had intended to invite her colleagues in the Lords to a private viewing of his ‘documentary’ Fitna, followed by discussion and debate in true parliamentary fashion. This is, after all, a liberal democracy, and their lordships enjoy the rights of freedom of expression and freedom of association, not to mention certain parliamentary privileges for the protection of their function in the legislature.

But no sooner had the unsuspecting baroness sent out her invitations, Lord Ahmed raised hell. It is reported that he ‘threatened to mobilise 10,000 Muslims to prevent Mr Wilders from entering the House and threatened to take the colleague who was organising the event to court’.

And so Fitna has been cancelled: it shall not now be screened in the House of Lords on 29th January.

The Pakistani Press is jubliant, and Lord Ahmed is praising Allah for delivering ‘a victory for the Muslim community’.
Continue reading

Thursday, January 29, 2009

The Persecution of Wilders

Holland, at one time the most liberal of countries, is morphing into a fascist state.
When controversial Dutch MP Geert Wilders decided to make Fitna, his hard-hitting movie about Islam, he knew it could lead to big problems. First, he could be prosecuted for insulting a group of believers: Muslims. Second, his film could create a major international controversy, possibly resulting in major riots abroad and at home.

To do what he could to ensure limited fallout, Wilders made the movie in such a way that he could not easily be accused of insulting Muslims personally. Although the film is critical of Islam and depicts it in a highly negative light, it is not negative about individual Muslims. It is a loophole used by Wilders and many before him.

Some Dutch Muslim organizations nonetheless responded with outrage to Fitna and asked Dutch prosecutors to file charges against Wilders. Prosecutors looked into it but concluded that they did not have a strong case against Wilders. They informed the organizations and individuals involved about their decision, and that was the end of it. Or so most thought.

The organizations, made up of immigrants, did not take no for an answer and went to court. They asked the judge to force the justice department to prosecute Wilders on the basis of anti-insulting statutes as established by Dutch law. To everyone’s surprise, the judges agreed with the groups and ordered prosecutors to file charges against Wilders, the most controversial and well-known member of the Dutch parliament.

Wilders rightfully responded with outrage to the news. It signaled, he said, the end of freedom and the end of the long-standing Dutch tradition of welcoming controversial figures with controversial opinions. The country that was once a safe haven for figures like Spinoza, who were not tolerated in any other country, now prosecutes those with strong opinions. It is something our forefathers could not have dreamed of.

He was not alone. Dutchmen and foreigners were angered by the court ruling, declaring that no self-respecting society would ever agree to prosecute a man who simply says what he believes. Especially a man who, although often not correct, has the backing of a sizable part of the population and has proved able to discuss those issues worrying society tremendously in a rational manner.

In fact Wilders is quite correct in everything he says about islam. I don’t like this Van Der Galien. I used to read his moderate blog. He is among those muddled thinking fools that believes that the extremists and terrorists don’t represent the real islam.

Although 53% of the Dutch support the prosecution of Wilders

I find it shocking that the majority of the Dutch want to see someone prosecuted for condemning an ideology which presents a dire threat to their own country. Muslims are raping and killing on their own streets and yet they want to persecute Wilders for his attacks on islam and defending the values and culture of their own country. The Dutch seem to be ok with the islamization of their country and are thus treating Wilders as a pariah rather than the islamists. Sick people.

Egypt's Persecution of Christians

While speaking to the muslim world, will Obama speak out for non-muslims who are being persecuted there? Will he speak out against the horrid treatment of women? This doesn't seem to be a concern for the western media and liberals. It's only about how we have to listen and respect them, never about what the muslim world must do in terms of human rights and respecting the rights of non-muslims and women, recognizing Israel, ending incitement in their schools, mosques and media.

A woman was arrested at a Cairo airport because her identity card listed her as Christian and the judge told her if he had a knife he would kill her. I'm waiting for those who are organizing boycotts against Israel for defending herself, to start a movement to boycott Egypt until the human rights of Coptic Christians and Christian converts are respected.

A woman arrested at the Cairo airport because her identity card described her as a Christian has been threatened for her faith by the judge in her case, according to a new report.

As WND reported, authorities in Egypt deprived the woman's two children, ages 2 and 4, of food to try to coerce her to abandon Christianity and return to Islam.

According to the Assyrian International News Agency, a woman identified as Martha Samuel Makkar was arrested Dec. 13 as she, her husband, Fadl Thabet, and two sons were trying to leave Cairo for Russia.

Makkar, formerly known as Zainab Said Abdel-Aziz, was accused of carrying forged government documents, because she identified herself as a Christian. Islamic law forbids Muslims from abandoning the faith.

Now, according to Compass Direct News, she has been granted bail, and released to rejoin her husband and sons at home pending her forgery trial.

However, the release was not without complications.

Makkar's lawyer, Nadia Tawfiq, reported that Judge Abdelaa Hashem questioned Makkar closely about her Christian faith during a courtroom hearing.

The decision to grant her bail came Saturday in the hearing before Hashem after Makkar told the judge about her new Christian faith and her abandonment of Islam.

Tawfiq told Compass Direct "the judge then said, 'I want to talk with Martha alone,' so we all left the room, and he said to her, 'Nobody changes from Muslim to Christian – you are a Muslim.'

"And she said, 'No, I am a Christian.' He told her, 'If I had a knife now, I would kill you,'" the lawyer said.
Continue reading

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

Carter is Unhinged

Jimmy Carter claims that hamas can be trusted and says they adhered to the ceasefire which they certainly did not, as hundreds of rockets were fired at Israel during the six month hudna. It's beyond me how he can say we should trust hamas, which gained sole power in Gaza through a coup, throwing fatah members off of roofs and inflicting sharia law on its own people, smuggled in weapons through tunnels and incessantly fires rockets at Israel. Carter has shown himself to be as obtuse as ever. The idea that there cannot be peace without the inclusion of hamas is ludicrous since the very purpose of hamas' existence is to destroy Israel. Carter ought to read the hamas charter, which is not only dedicated to the obliteration of Israel, but to killing Jews simply because they are Jews. Apparently Carter doesn't see this as an obstacle to peace.

Hamas can be trusted, former US President Jimmy Carter said Monday, in an interview on NBC's 'Today' show. Carter spoke with NBC's Meredith Vieira about his perspective on the Middle East conflict, and his new book, "We Can Have Peace in the Holy Land."

According to the former president, Hamas never deviated from their commitments as per the ceasefire agreement. He said that, during his meetings with Hamas leaders in Damascus and Gaza, he was promised that Hamas would honor agreements between Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and Israel, as long as they were supported by public referendum.

Hamas did bad things. I'm not defending them. But they did adhere to the ceasefire fully, Carter maintained. He added that Israel has a choice between a one-state solution – which is, for Israel, a catastrophe, and a two-state solution, which everyone would support.

In his interview, Carter explained the rationale behind his book, saying "I am writing another book about the Middle East because the new president of the United States is facing a major opportunity — and responsibility — to lead in ending conflict between Israel and its neighbors. The time is now. Peace is possible."
Continue reading

The Truth About Islam

To further emphasize the point that muslim terrorism is not a product of imaginary modern day grievances against America and Israel, but rather an inherent part of the islamic doctrine known as jihad, here is a quote from a 19th century British Prime Minister regarding the koran and islam:

William Ewart Gladstone (1809–1898) was Prime Minister of Great Britain four times: 1868–74, 1880–85, 1886 and 1892–94. He called the Qur'an an "accursed book" and once held it up during a session of Parliament, declaring: "So long as there is this book there will be no peace in the world."

Of course this quote was said a time when Britain actually had leaders who didn't have to fear saying exactly what islam is. And they had no shame in stalwartly defending their country and way of life. The same goes for the rest of western civilization. Today's spineless western leaders grovel and submit to our muslim enemies and apologize for who we are. Those few who do speak out against the islamization of the west will be criminalized.

Doesn't this quote reveal that islam has been menacing the world for centuries? Why does this fail to get through to "blame America first" liberals?

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

Obama Grovels on Arab TV

It should offend all Americans that the first people Obama chooses to address as president is not us, but instead grovels to the riffraff on the Arab street. Just as the first foreign leader he chose to call was abbas and during his inauguration speech he chose to place muslims ahead of Jews saying "this is a nation of Christians, muslims, Jews and Hindus".

President Barack Obama presented a humble and conciliatory face of America to the Islamic world Monday in the first formal interview since he assumed office, stressing his own Muslim ties and hopes for a Palestinian state, and avoiding a belligerent tone — even when asked if America could "live with" an Iranian nuclear weapon.

The interview with the Dubai-based Al-Arabiya Network was a dramatic piece of public diplomacy aimed at capitalizing on the new American president's international popularity, though it balanced America's traditional commitment to Israel, whose security Obama called "paramount.'

"I have Muslim members of my family. I have lived in Muslim countries," Obama said, according to a White House transcript. "My job to the Muslim world is to communicate that the Americans are not your enemy."

Anyone who dared to refer to Obama's muslim background during the campaign or to so much as use his middle name was deemed "racist". Now Hussein Obama himself discusses his muslim family members and his childhood in muslim Indonesia. And just what do we have to be conciliatory to muslims for? For liberating millions of them from a tyrant in Iraq and closing down the torture chambers and rape rooms? For overthrowing the taliban and the fact that girls can now go to school in Afghanistan?

The occasion for this interview was the departure of Obama's special envoy, George Mitchell, to the Middle East, and a more aggressive and optimistic approach to that conflict than some argued that the circumstances dictated. The president offered no timeline for peace, but a firm view that a Palestinian state remains within reach.

"What I told him is start by listening, because all too often the United States starts by dictating — in the past on some of these issues — and we don't always know all the factors that are involved," Obama said. "What we want to do is to listen, set aside some of the preconceptions that have existed and have built up over the last several years. And I think if we do that, then there's a possibility at least of achieving some breakthroughs."

Is he going to bother to listen to Israel's concerns or does only the Arab point of view matter? Is our support of Israel another reason we should apologize to the muslim world? Why does the foreign policy establishment view favoring Israel as a negative which needs to be rectified with an "even handed" approach? Even handed being code for turning against Israel. But why shouldn't we favor Israel over her enemies since they are not on the same moral plane. Israel is a free, democratic country while her enemies are dictatorships and terrorists.

Obama responded only generally, expressing disapproval of an Iranian bomb but not the flat condemnation that is standard from American officials.

"You know, I said during the campaign that it is very important for us to make sure that we are using all the tools of U.S. power, including diplomacy, in our relationship with Iran," he said. "Now, the Iranian people are a great people, and Persian civilization is a great civilization. Iran has acted in ways that's not conducive to peace and prosperity in the region: their threats against Israel; their pursuit of a nuclear weapon which could potentially set off an arms race in the region that would make everybody less safe; their support of terrorist organizations in the past -- none of these things have been helpful."

That should be present tense. Iran is currently supporting terror groups.

Obama also signaled a move away from President Bush's confrontational, generalizing language. Melhem noted to Obama that "President Bush framed the war on terror conceptually in a way that was very broad, 'war on terror,' and used sometimes certain terminology that the many people -- Islamic fascism. You've always framed it in a different way, specifically against one group called al Qaeda and their collaborators."

President Bush’s language was unfortunately far from confrontational. In fact he foolishly went out of his way to falsely declare that the terrorists hijacked a peaceful religion, although it is quite clear that the terrorists are carrying out islamic doctrine as stated in the koran. Bush briefly used terms like “islamic fascism” and was quickly pressured to back off on that and other such truthful language to describe the enemy we face.

"I think that you're making a very important point. And that is that the language we use matters," Obama replied. "[W]hat we need to understand is, is that there are extremist organizations -- whether Muslim or any other faith in the past -- that will use faith as a justification for violence. We cannot paint with a broad brush a faith as a consequence of the violence that is done in that faith's name.

So we are not supposed to refer to terrorism committed in the name of islam as islamic terrorism.

I don’t want a president who grovels to seventh century barbarians and believes that we need to apologize to and gain the approval of society’s where women and girls are executed for being rape victims and adultery in soccer stadiums filled with thousands of cheering savages.

What he is doing projects weakness. We have nothing to apologize for. Our values and our civilization are superior. It is not us who has to change, it is the muslim world which needs transforming. We are not the ones who's schools, media and places of worship indoctrinate people to hatred and murder. We went to war in Iraq and Afghanistan because WE WERE ATTACKED BY MUSLIMS. And they didn’t attack us because of anything we did to them or because of Israel or any other imaginary modern day grievances. Muslims have been waging jihad against infidels since the seventh century, when islam began. Jihad is mandatory, it is in the koran, in the hadiths. Liberals are stupid and dangerous in their refusal to grasp what islam is about and why muslims are waging war against us.

Why does Obama feel that the onus is on us to make amends? How about Arab leaders apologize to Americans on American TV for funding and inciting hatred and violence against us and how about the saudis actually cease funding these mosques and madrassas around the world which are responsible? That is something we won't see in this lifetime.

This is the fundamental problem with liberalism, the notion that the responsibility for islamic terrorism lies with us and our behavior rather than the poisonous ideology which prevails throughout the muslim world and has since the seventh century. And another problem is in pretending that terrorism is not unique to islam but rather as Obama absurdly states that there are extremist organizations whether Muslim or any other faith that will use faith as a justification for violence. Where is there an equivalent to al qaeda in the Christian, Jewish, Hindu or Buddhist religions? There are none, they don’t exist. What religion other than islam is waging jihad and mass murdering people around the globe, beheading, flogging and stoning? There is no other. Obama’s politically correct language is dangerous.

The Demise of Free Speech in Europe

Freedom continues to be whittled away in Europe in deference to their muslim overlords. In today's Europe one can actually serve time in prison for "thought crimes". Although I believe this is only confined to criticism of islam. Meanwhile muslims themselves can publicly call for the deaths of infidels with impunity.

This time an Austrian court has convicted a member of parliament for her criticism of islam and mohammed. You'll notice how the media always refers to critics of islam as "far right" in order to marginalize them, making it appear that condemning islam is itself an extremist position. Geert Wilders is also referred to as "far right" which he is nothing of the kind.
Vienna - Austrian far-right parliamentarian Susanne Winter was convicted Thursday of incitement because of her anti-Muslim statements, including the claim that Islam's prophet Mohammed was a paedophile. A court in Winter's home town of Graz also found the 51-year-old politician guilty of humiliating a religion. She was sentenced to a fine of 24,000 euros (31,000 dollars) euros and a suspended prison term of three months, Austrian news agency APA reported.

The politician, who took a seat in parliament last fall for the Freedom Party (FPOe), made the anti-Islamic remarks in January 2008.

She also proposed in a discussion with students that Muslim men should commit bestiality rather than making "indecent advances" on girls.

The politician had pleaded innocent Thursday, claiming that she "did not want to insult anyone, but only to point out problems."

The verdict is not yet legally binding.

Winter's son Michael, a former youth leader in the Freedom Party, was convicted of the same crime last October. He had suggested in a newsletter that Turkish Muslims were in the habit of committing bestiality.

Of course mohammed was indeed a pedophile who married a six year old girl and consummated the marriage when she was nine. And also, there is a serious problem of muslim gang rapes in Europe.

Cat Stevens Raising Money For Hamas

The artist formerly known as cat stevens and now islamic jihadist scumbag, recorded a song to raise money for hamas.

JERUSALEM (AFP) – Singer-songwriter Yusuf Islam, formerly known as Cat Stevens, released on Sunday a charity song whose proceeds will go towards assisting Palestinians in the war-ravaged Gaza Strip.

The new recording of the song ‘The day the world gets round’, originally recorded by George Harrison, features Yusuf on vocals and Klaus Voorman, known to many as the fifth Beatle, on bass.

The song can be dowloaded online at different rates and its proceeds will go towards the United Nations Relief and Works Agency and Save the Children to aid children and families in the Gaza Strip, UNRWA said in a statement.

Yusuf said on his website he hoped the recording will “help remind people of the immense legacy of love, peace and happiness we can share when we get round to looking at mankind’s futile wars and prejudices.”

Of course as everyone should know by now, the UNRWA is run by hamas and any money sent there will be used for weapons. Twenty years ago stevens was shunned and boycotted for making public statements in support of the ayatollah khomeini's fatwa against Salman Rushdie. Apparently now he is being embraced by the music industry these days. That's because those leftists have no problem with someone who's a muslim, but just don't be an evangelical Christian.

Monday, January 26, 2009

Yvonne Ridley Fantasizes the End of Israel

Converted muslim, yvonne ridley dreams that someday Israel will no longer exist:

We still do not know how many Israeli soldiers have died... it is a figure Olmert is trying to keep quiet. No public, ceremonial funerals are shown on TV in Tel Aviv. The Israelis, so used to playing the victim for U.S. and European media outlets, have not been able to publicly display their mourning to the world. Could it be that mothers, wives, and daughters of the dead would want to blame the Israeli government for yet another failed campaign?


I hope Barrack Obama and Hilary Clinton take note.

And I hope they realize now that democratically elected Hamas is the only party in town to sit down and negotiate with. Failed Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas should now be viewed as collateral damage. His credibility has gone and any deal he made with Israel over this shameful period will soon be revealed. By the way, I have heard that his luxury villa in Gaza is about the only building that is free of shrapnel, shells, or bullet marks. It certainly survived the bombing in a district which was attacked without mercy. Funny that!

Gaza will rise again from the rubble with its people even stronger than before. They are an example to resistance fighters across the world and they will go down in history for their bravery and courage.

In a few years time children across the Middle East will be raised on the heroic stories and exploits of the people of Gaza. And as they are safely tucked up in their beds, they'll probably ask: "So what did happen to Israel? Did it really exist?"

Of course it is the so-called "palestinians" who always successfully play victim for US and european media outlets with the help of moral degenerate westerners like ridley herself, even as they terrorize and call for the deaths of Jews.

Gaza was rubble before this war, because these pathetic people do not build up anything, they only destroy. The former Jewish residents who were ethnically cleansed from Gaza left greenhouses which were subsequently destroyed by yvonne's wonderful noble "palestinians". Jews took a barren desert and built an economic and technological giant. The Arab-muslims turn every land they have into a hellhole. And as for her disgusting, distorted interpretation of hamas cowards as being brave and couragous, these fiends hid away from the IDF and used their own people, women and children as human shields. Some courage that took. Furthermore, a few days prior to the war, hamas instituted sharia law, allowing crucifixions and amputations. These are the savages ridley glorifies. Yvonne ridley is a disgrace to women for defending a culture which treats women as chattel and abuses and sacrifices their own children as they raise them to be suicide bombers.

England Succumbs to Islam

Melanie Phillips laments Britain's surrender to jihad by the country's media, academia and political class:

By Melanie Phillips, Wall Street Journal (Europe), 20 January 2009

In Britain, the war in Gaza has revealed the extent to which the media, intelligentsia and political class have simply crumbled in the face of the global jihad.

The U.K. is a major player in European and world politics and is America’s most significant strategic ally. Until now, it has been considered one of Israel’s firm supporters and a linchpin of the Western defense against the world-wide Islamist onslaught. With the reaction to Gaza, however, that reputation is no longer sustainable.

Years of demonizing Israel and appeasing Islamist extremism within Britain have now coalesced, as a result of the media misrepresentation of the Gaza war as an atrocity against civilians, in an unprecedented wave of hatred against Israel and a sharp rise in attacks on British Jews.

Throughout the war, London’s streets have witnessed a hallucinatory level of violent and explicit support for Hamas from Muslims, members of the far left and supposedly progressive individuals.

Night after night, Israel’s embassy in well-to-do Kensington found itself under violent siege. Demonstrators attempted to storm the building, howling their support for the terrorist body whose genocidal intentions toward Israel and the Jews necessarily includes killing every one of the occupants inside.

Certainly, there have been anti-Israel protests around the world. But in Britain, not only have these been particularly violent but the authorities have done nothing to stop such incitement of hatred.

The police told pro-Israel demonstrators on at least one occasion to put away their Israel flags because they were ‘inflammatory.’ Yet officers allowed some anti-Israel demonstrators to scream support for Hamas — and even to dress up as hook-nosed Jews pretending to drink the blood of Palestinian babies.

In general, the police have reacted passively to the violence. One recent video clip captured the astonishing spectacle of Muslims stampeding through London’s West End hurling traffic cones and other missiles at the police, all the time shrieking ‘Allahu akbar’ and ‘cowards.’ The police ran and stumbled backward rather than standing their ground and stopping the rampage.

A microcosm of the emasculated state of modern day Great Britain. This kind of reminds me of the "Conquest of the Planet of the Apes", where at the end of the movie the apes rampage through the streets, set the city on fire and finally overtake the humans. Though it's really not a fair comparison, since in reality apes are much more civilized. Read the rest

60 Minutes' Distortions

I watched part of a 60 Minutes report from Bob Simon about the Israeli/palestinian conflict. And naturally it was what you would expect it to be, a completely one-sided pro-palestinian, anti-Israel piece portraying the poor palestinians as the innocent victims of Israeli oppression and intransigence.

It started out by demonizing the "settlers" in Judea and Samaria as the obstacles to a palestinian state. Of course I oppose palestinian statehood, nevertheless, the obstacle to such a state is not the Jewish residents themselves, but the fact that the "palestinians" demand a state free of Jews. This is pure racism and Judeophobia. Why can't they have their state with Jews as residents? Arabs live in Israel, they are 20% of the population. If Jews were demanding that their state has to be free of Arabs, they would be vilified as racists around the world. In fact the irony is that Israel is vilified as being a racist, apartheid state anyway, although Arabs have equal rights. Meanwhile Arabs demand they be given a state free of Jews, as other Arab states are, and that not only isn't condemned as racist, it is actually demanded that Jews be ethnically cleansed from those Arab majority areas. I am so tired of the world indulging this sickening double standard. And to further belie the popular notion that Jewish settlements are the obstacle to peace, every single Jew in Gaza was removed and instead of peace there was rockets. You would think people would get the message by now.

Then Simon went on to mention a Jews only highway and left it at that. He did not bother to give any context as to why that is. A separate highway was created because Arab snipers were shooting at Jewish drivers. He also of course mentioned the checkpoints. And again he provided no context such as the fact that Arab suicide bombers were entering Israel to murder Jews. Every time they are allowed freedom of movement, Israelis die. There is a reason of course why things have become relatively quiet in Judea and Samaria ever since operation defensive shield, because contrary to what the gasbags say on TV, there IS a military solution to terrorism. At that point of the broadcast I changed the channel. Even that small segment was more than I could stomach. Is it any wonder why people in the west get such a distorted view of the Middle East. I'm sure CAMERA and Honest Reporting will cover that 60 Minutes report.

Sunday, January 25, 2009

Haveil Havalim

Edition #202 of the Jewish blog carnival Haveil Havalim is up over at SuperRaizy.

Frightening Scenario For Israel

An extremely frightening scenario of what Iran, Syria, hamas and hezbollah may be planning against Israel once Iran obtains nuclear weapons. The article claims the missiles Iran provided to hamas through Syria and made by China and North Korea were deliberately devoid of guidance systems. The reason being that they did not want to provoke Israel into a far more devastating attack possibly against Iran itself and Syria, before Iran has nuclear weapons. The conclusion is that the rockets fired by hamas were merely a practice run for the "real" war to come once these weapons are in Iran's arsenal.

WHY AREN’T JEWS SMARTer?

by Emanuel A. Winston, Mid East analyst & commentator

How did we Jews get such an exaggerated reputation for our advanced thinking?

Just because we have so many Nobel Prize winners, out of proportion to our numbers?

Just because we value education based on our thousands of years of living by the Torah which requires constant study?

Well, today the analysts of military accomplishments or losses are busy configuring the recent 22 days of War in Gaza against 8 years of Hamas launching from 8,000 to 10,000 Rockets, Missiles and Mortars against Israel’s civilians. Many are blaming the “Three Stooges”: Prime MInister Ehud Olmert (resigned due to imminent criminal indictments - but, still in power); Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni (a sycophant of the former U.S. Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice); and Defense Minister Ehud Barak (known for running away from combat, leaving his soldiers and allies wounded and vulnerable) for quitting too soon and not finishing Hamas off. The smuggling tunnels are already being refurbished and running new weapons into Gaza, with Egypt keeping its eyes closed.

The future course for Israel will likely be entitled: “How to Abandon Victory and Lose a Nation”.

How did Olmert, Livni and Barak manage to stage another blunder after the 2006 Lebanon War against Hezb’Allah blunder?

Both Hamas and Hezb’Allah are proxies of Iran and Syria, from whom Hezb’Allah and Hamas receive their advanced weaponry.

In a recent conversation with a world traveler and deep thinker, we discussed the thousands of Rocket and more advanced long-range Grad Missiles still in the hands of Hamas and Hezb’Allah. Our question was: Why did Hamas not score more hits on substantive targets?

My friend opined that the “unguided” Missiles supplied by Iran through Syria (often made by China or North Korea) deliberately did not yet come with guidance systems and, therefore, what Hamas fired was their pre-practice for their next saturation Missile attack when they launch a real war with guidance-controlled Missiles.

In other words, Iran did not want Hamas to be accurate. Their 8 years of launching Rockets, Missiles and Mortars was just “practice” for the real thing - and to terrorize the civilian population of Israel.

Clearly, if more important strategic targets were hit prematurely and obliterated (not “just” civilians), even the reluctant Leftist leaders and population of Israel would have to retaliate with devastating attacks on Iran and Syria - before Iran’s nuclear weapons are ready.

But, if Iran, Syria, Hezb’Allah, Hamas and the internal Terror groups of Muslim Arab Palestinians were to be effective in a future attack, they needed launch crews who were sufficiently trained to fire advanced Missiles with accurate guidance systems. The inept leaders of Israel have not grasped what is happening, nor can they understand their own incoming Intelligence adequately to know what they must do - pre-emptively.
Continue reading

Saturday, January 24, 2009

The Creepy Cult of Obama

Someone needs to tell these dimwit celebrities that you are supposed to pledge your allegiance to the United States of America, not to any one particular leader. This "I Pledge" video of celebrities pledging to serve Obama is nauseating. If it weren't scary it would be funny.

The Obama Cult
Writing in the Province, a Vancouver, British Columbia, newspaper, columnist Ethan Baron describes some creepy Canadians as they watch President Obama's inauguration:
Rapt eyes shone as Obama spoke with stunning eloquence of re-building America. When the president delivered perhaps his most impressive rhetorical offering, telling the world's tyrants, "We will extend a hand if you are willing to unclench your fist," many in the audience gasped audibly at the sheer power of his language.
I haven't seen a group of people wearing their fervour so completely, and so uniformly, since a guy I used to work with brought me to visit his weird sex cult in California.

We liked that line too. But this degree of adulation for a politician is rather unsettling. And it's not only Canadians. Check out the "I Pledge" video, produced by Demi Moore and Ashton Kutcher, which Michael Graham describes in the Boston Herald:
When rocker Anthony Kiedis says "I pledge to be of service to Barack Obama," it seems humorously over the top.
But then Moore stares intently into the camera and announces "I pledge to be a servant to our president," a pledge echoed by all the celebs who promise to become "the change that we seek."
A pledge of allegiance to Obama? I don't care if you're a Republican, Democrat or a Vegan Evangelical Anarchist--that's just plain creepy.
It's also odd coming from a group of people who've previously shown little enthusiasm for pledging allegiance to our flag, much less a previous president.

"This isn't patriotism," Graham observes--and he's right. Patriotism is the love of one's country, not a devotion to any particular officeholder. We would venture to say that patriotism demands a degree of respect for the presidency, and for the man who holds the office at any given time, whether or not one admires the president or finds his policies congenial.

Obama is our president too, and we wish him well. But this cult phenomenon is the flip side of the hatred that the left too often displayed during the Bush years. As long as it remains the province of a political fringe, and as long as Obama is wise enough not to let it go to its head, it is likely to be harmless. But history offers numerous cautionary tales about the dangers of treating politicians as objects of worship.

Trivializing Threats Against Israel

This jerk Mark Steel who writes an opinion column for Britain's The Independent makes light of the qassam rockets fired at Israel.

Also, if the Israelis think the Hamas rockets are as lethal as they say, why don't they swap their F-16 fighters and Apache helicopters for a few of them?

These things are capable of terrorising a whole nation for years apparently, yet the Israelis have neglected to buy any, wasting their money on gunboats and stuff. Given that their annual arms budget is $7.2bn plus $2.2 bn in "aid", they'd save enough to buy a selection of banks in every country in the world.

Perhaps that punk should have to live in Sderot for a month and then we'll see if he finds the qassam rockets amusing.

Good News for Terrorists

Obama begins dismantling Bush administration anti-terror policies. These are policies which have kept America safe since 9/11. For all of the talk of change, in reality Obama is merely reverting us back to the situation which existed before president Bush was in office. Even with many of the same people. Now did those people and policies keep us safe? The answer is obviously not.

Key components of the secret structure developed under Bush are being swept away: The military’s Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, facility, where the rights of habeas corpus and due process had been denied detainees, will close, and the CIA is now prohibited from maintaining its own overseas prisons. And in a broad swipe at the Bush administration’s lawyers, Obama nullified every legal order and opinion on interrogations issued by any lawyer in the executive branch after Sept. 11, 2001.
h/t Soccerdad

Obama and like minded people believe that this will improve America's image in the world. Now I don't particularly care what the riffraff on the Arab street thinks of us nor the snobs in Paris cafes or the London intelligencia. I want a president who's priority is to keep America safe. And anyway why should we be concerned about the judgement of countries in which girls and women are executed in soccer stadiums in front of thousands of cheering barbarians for being rape victims or committing adultery? Obviously liberals think the opinions of seventh century savages is of utmost importance.

Friday, January 23, 2009

England Becomes an Islamic Country

Its worse in England than I thought. Essentially the country is already lost. This country which had once been lead by the likes of Winston Churchill and Margaret Thatcher has surrendered to islam, its culture, religion, laws and way of life. From Mere Rhetoric:

British Islam has functionally defeated British Anglicanism. Schools are canceling Christmas in favor of Eid. Defending Christianity on the radio is now a firing offense. British prisoners are converting en masse to Islam either to get gang protection or because Muslims, having hijacked maximum security prisons, are forcing them to.

Everyday British institutions - those daily things that give life and color to a culture - are being gutted whenever they conflict with Muslim sensibilities. Historic pubs are being quickly altered whenever they rouse offense. Cultural staples like pork are becoming subject to discrimination lawsuits.

Meanwhile bloody Ashura flogging is now a public British ritual. There is a wave of honor killings crashing across Britain, with brothers killing their own sisters. Sharia - having been supported by a broad range of British legal officials - has now been officially incorporated into financial policy and civil law. "Moderate" British Muslim organizations are launching witchhunts against Muslims who cooperate with anti-terrorism investigators. "Moderate" British mosques are hosting 9/11 champions. The country is crawling with jihadists. British radicals even have their own airline.

The only thing left to do is to replace the Union Jack with a green field and crescent flag.

Hamas Lies About Casualties

This is something the international left as well as the Arab-muslim world will be disappointed to hear. The Italian newspaper Corriere Della Sera is reporting that a doctor at a gaza hospital says that no more than 600 were killed and that hamas purposely exaggerated the number of civilian casualties. And that among those were mostly youths recruited by hamas. The reporter also based his conclusions by touring Gaza hospitals and interviewing families of casualties. The paper also reports that a resident of Tal al-Hawa said that armed hamas teenagers fired at residents houses in order for Israel to be blamed for war crimes. Finally a reporter actually doing real reporting and actually trying to get at the truth.

What really is behind the numbers reported on the number of civilian casualties in the Gaza Strip? Italian newspaper Corriere Della Sera reported Thursday that a doctor working in Gaza's Shifa Hospital claimed that Hamas has intentionally inflated the number of casualties resulting from Israel's Operation Cast Lead.

"The number of deceased stands at no more than 500 to 600. Most of them are youths between the ages of 17 to 23 who were recruited to the ranks of Hamas, who sent them to the slaughter," according to the newspaper article.

The doctor wished to remain unidentified, out of fear for his life.


A Tal al-Hawa resident told the newspaper's reporter, "Armed Hamas men sought out a good position for provoking the Israelis. There were mostly teenagers, aged 16 or 17, and armed. They couldn't do a thing against a tank or a jet. They knew they are much weaker, but they fired at our houses so that they could blame Israel for war crimes."

The reporter for the Italian newspaper also quoted reporters in the Strip who told of Hamas' exaggerated figures, "We have already said to Hamas commanders – why do you insist on inflating the number of victims?"

These same reporters mentioned that the truth that will come out is likely to be similar to what occurred in Operation Defensive Shield in Jenin. "Then, there was first talk of 1,500 deaths. But then it turned out that there were only 54, 45 of which were armed men," the Palestinian reporters told the Italian newspaper


Even Gaza residents now confirm what Israel had been trying to explain throughout the war, that hamas used civilians as human shields and used UN buildings for launching rockets. But the international media, the UN and human rights groups weren't interested in hearing as they screeched about Israeli atrocities and "war crimes".

The number of Palestinians killed in Operation Cast Lead did not exceed five or six hundred, Lorenzo Cremonesi, a correspondent for Italy's Corriere della sera reported on Thursday.

Cremonesi based his report on tours of hospitals in the Gaza Strip and on interviews with families of casualties. He also assessed the number of wounded to be far lower than 5,000, the number quoted by Hamas and repeated by the UN and the Red Cross in Gaza.

"It is sufficient to visit several hospitals [in the Gaza Strip] to understand that the numbers don't add up," he wrote.

In the European hospital in Rafah, one of the facilities which would presumably be filled with wounded from the "war of the tunnels," many beds were empty, according to Cremonesi. A similar situation was noted in the Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis, and in the privately-run Amal Hospital Cremonesi reported that only five out 150 beds were occupied.

Cremonesi interviewed Gazans who echoed Israel's insistence of how Hamas gunmen used civilians as human shields. One Gazan recalled civilians in Gaza shouting at Hamas and Islamic Jihad men, "Go away, go away from here! Do you want the Israelis to kill us all? Do you want our children to die under their bombs? Take your guns and missiles with you."

"Traitors, collaborators with Israel, spies of Fatah, cowards! The soldiers of the holy war will punish you. And in any case you will all die, like us. Fighting the Zionist Jews we are all destined for paradise. Do you not wish to die with us?" the religious fanatics of Hamas reportedly responded.

Other Palestinians told Cremonesi of Hamas operatives donning paramedic uniforms and commandeering ambulances. A woman identified as Um Abdullah, 48, spoke of Hamas using UN buildings as launch pads for rockets.

Cremonesi reported that he had difficultly gathering evidence as the local population was terrified of Hamas.


So it would seem that the war hasn't resulted in hamas gaining in popularity contrary to the prediction of pundits.

Thursday, January 22, 2009

The Closing of Guantanimo

I don't want it closed ever. The sacrifices our troops have made will go for naught as these prisoners will go back to terrorism like 61 of them who were released from Gitmo already did. I really can't understand the misguided concern liberals have for the worst terrorists on the planet who wouldn't hesitate to slaughter us en masse. These are sub-human scum. Some liberals are touting this as Obama showing his commitment to "human rights". Of all of the priorities regarding the issue of human rights around the world, why this? How about helping the people of Sudan if Obama wants to show his commitment to human rights. I wouldn't blame our soldiers for being pissed off not only at Obama but their fellow Americans for having elected him.

Dutch Court Submits to Islam

A Dutch court genuflects before islamists and rules to suppress freedom of speech. The court intends to prosecute Geert Wilders for inciting racial hatred. I didn't know islam was a race. Wilders is being persecuted for telling the truth about the horrors of islam and rightly calling the koran a fascist book, comparing it to mein kampf and called for its banning. It's ironic that Wilders can be accused of inciting hatred since the koran, which he has condemned, incites hatred and murder throughout. It is insane when those who speak out against fascism and stand up for freedom, are themselves labeled as haters and extremists. Europe is rotting from within. Europe doesn't have a modicum of self-respect. At least the governments don't. There is something very seriously psychologically wrong with those in positions of power that they would literally hand their countries over to enemies and throw their own to the wolves. Governments throughout Europe are guilty of treasonous behavior. I think the reason why America and Israel are hated by Europeans is because our willingness to fight for ourselves contrasts with how emasculated the European male is. Wilders of course is a rare exception. I wonder if these laws apply to the muslim imams who spew hatred and incite violence against infidels? I bet not.

THE HAGUE, Netherlands – A right-wing lawmaker should be prosecuted for inciting racial hatred with anti-Islamic statements that include calling the Quran a "fascist book," a Dutch court ruled Wednesday.

Freedom Party leader Geert Wilders made headlines around the world in March 2008 with his film "Fitna," which juxtaposed Quranic verses against a background of violent film clips and images of terrorism by Islamic radicals.

In 2007, Wilders called for a ban on the Quran "the same way we ban 'Mein Kampf.'" He said both Adolf Hitler's work and the Muslim holy book contain passages that contradict Western values.

The Amsterdam Appeals Court called Wilders' statements in his film, newspaper articles and media interviews "one-sided generalizations ... which can amount to inciting hatred."

The court's ruling reverses a decision last year by the public prosecutor's office , which said Wilders' film and interviews were painful for Muslims but not criminal.

Wilders told Dutch media it was a "black day for myself and for freedom of speech."

The decision set the stage for what will likely be a highly charged trial touching on the declining Dutch tolerance toward a large immigrant population from Muslim countries, mainly Morocco and Turkey. Dutch attitudes shifted markedly after the 2004 murder of filmmaker Theo van Gogh by a radical Dutch Muslim.

Wilders, whose party has nine lawmakers in the 120-seat lower house of Dutch Parliament, has built his popularity largely on tapping into fear and resentment among Dutch voters of Muslim immigrants.

"I've had enough of Islam in the Netherlands; let not one more Muslim immigrate," he wrote once in national newspaper De Volkskrant. "I've had enough of the Quran in the Netherlands: Forbid that fascist book."

The three judges said they had weighed Wilders' anti-Islamic rhetoric against his right to free speech, and ruled he had even gone beyond the normal leeway given to politicians.

Because Wilders has not yet been charged, it is not clear what maximum penalty he could face if convicted.

While judges in the Netherlands generally are loathe to become involved in public debate, the court said it was making an exception in the case of Wilders' comments about Islam.

"The court considers this so insulting for Muslims that it is in the public interest to prosecute Wilders," a summary of the court's decision said.

Gerard Spong, a prominent lawyer who joined Islamic groups in pushing for Wilders' prosecution, welcomed the decision.

"This is a happy day for all followers of Islam who do not want to be tossed on the garbage dump of Naziism," Spong told reporters in Amsterdam.

Islam IS nazism.

Gazans Deserve No Sympathy

The NY Times continues its sympathetic coverage of the palestinians, whitewashing of hamas war crimes and demonization of Israel. This latest is from Sabrina Tavernise: Many Civilian Targets, but One Core Question Among Gazans: Why?
Why? There's a very simple answer. If you don't want Israeli bombs, stop being a threat to the lives of Israelis, stop launching rockets at Israeli children and other kinds of terrorist attacks. Don't vote in terrorists, don't teach your children that it is their religious duty to kill Jews and that by doing so you will be rewarded in the hereafter. Israel removed its troops and civilians from Gaza three years ago. You were given a chance to build a viable, productive society but instead you chose to burn down the greenhouses which were left to you, you voted for terrorists to lead you and who use civilian structures such as schools, hospitals to store weapons and take up positions to fire at the IDF and then use the people for human shields. Why is this so difficult to grasp? Why don't these people ever take responsibility for their actions and why do western liberals indulge their infantile behavior and attitudes? Message to the folks at the NY Times and like-minded people, Israel is not the villain in this nor is there any moral equivalence between Israel and hamas.

They hit my future with a rocket,” said Muhammad Baroud, one of the students at the Islamic University in Gaza City. “This is a university. What does it have to do with war?

How many Israelis were deprived of a future because of your people's sick hatred and fanaticism, your rockets, bombs and guns? Islamic university was a hamas run school in which weapons were being produced.

We are sympathizers, but we have nothing to do with launching rockets,” said Adam Ghabin, 21, a firefighter at Gaza City’s main fire station, which has two giant craters in its complex from bombings. Hamas martyr posters were taped to the walls


Nothing to do with the rockets all the while having hamas posters taped to the wall. The palestinians give their support to hamas therefore they are responsible for hamas' actions and thus deserve no sympathy.

“The police is a civil institution,” he said outside the pile of rubble that once was Gaza City’s central police station. “It serves the people, not the parties.”

The police are hamas terrorists. Frankly I am so sick of these people whining about their supposed victimization all the while it is they who are the victimizers. Unfortunately with the help of the distorted and bias coverage of the western media, they are able to manipulate western public opinion to empathize with them. I feel no guilt in saying that I don't have a shred of sympathy. The NY Times is disgraceful.

Norwegian Envoy Equates Israel With Nazis

A Saudi based Norwegian diplomat, Trine Lilleng, compared Israel to the nazis. Yet the country she currently resides in is among the most brutally repressive, racist, misogynist on Earth, and where the practice of all other religions but islam is forbidden. It is also ruled by sharia where women are forced to cover themselves in public, enforced by religious police. Beheadings, floggings and the amputation of limbs are the kinds of punishments meted out for various "crimes". And among the "crimes" in which women can be imprisoned, flogged, stoned or whipped, is for something as minor as being alone with an unrelated man or even being a rape victim. But does this Norwegian bitch call the saudis nazis, of course not. That comparison is reserved for the freest country in the Middle East, and has the greatest respect for human rights. It takes a truly morally depraved individual to refer to the Israelis as nazis.

A Norwegian diplomat based in Saudi Arabia has sent out e-mails from her Foreign Ministry e-mail account equating Israel's offensive against Hamas in Gaza with the systematic mass murder of six million Jews by the Nazis.

One of the picture sets that Norwegian diplomat Trine Lilleng attached to her anti-Israeli e-mail.
Slideshow: Pictures of the week

The e-mail, sent out by Trine Lilleng, a first secretary at the Norwegian Embassy in Riyadh, includes a juxtaposition of black-and-white pictures from the Holocaust with color images of Operation Cast Lead.

"The grandchildren of Holocaust survivors from World War II are doing to the Palestinians exactly what was done to them by Nazi Germany," the e-mail states.

A copy of the e-mail was obtained by The Jerusalem Post.

The 40-plus pictures included as attachments in the e-mail include the famous image of a Jewish boy with his hands raised as a German soldier points his gun at him, next to an image of an Israeli soldier aiming his weapon at a Palestinian boy.

Another depicts a German soldier firing his weapon, next to an IDF soldier shooting his, while others juxtapose the barbed wire surrounding ghettos and concentration camps to the fence around Gaza, and the West Bank security barrier.

The e-mail asks recipients to forward the message to others.

Reached on her cellphone in Riyadh, Lilleng told the Post she had sent the message to "a few friends" in a "private e-mail," and had not sent any copy to the Post.

She would not say whether it was proper for her to use her ministry e-mail account for such a controversial message.

"I am not interested in saying anything about that," she said.
Continue reading

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

Brit General Defends Israel

A former British general being interviewed on the BBC actually blames hamas and not Israel for civilian casualties and even explains to the twit interviewer that no other military in the history of warfare has made more efforts to reduce civilian casualties than Israel has. Imagine that. He also explains that hamas uses human shields as a major part of their defensive plan. It's a pleasant surprise that he would even be interviewed by the BBC.


Still Race-Baiting

White people have no self respect. Why else would they vote for, fawn over and celebrate a president who associates with those who hate them? Why else would they sit by in silence after they were insulted and demeaned by a black speaker at the inauguration? These people speak unity and we are told to fall in line, all the while they remain divisive. I'm talking about white leftists as well as black supporters of Hussein Obama. No matter that we just inaugurated a black president, to the perpetually aggrieved, the white race is still collectively guilty for past decades and past centuries over the mistreatment of blacks and America as far as they are concerned has still not made amends. They act as though nothing has changed in a hundred years no matter how many positions of power blacks obtain. Yet today, it is blacks who are openly expressing racial hatred.

Outrage is erupting over the inauguration benediction by Rev. Joseph Lowery, an 87-year-old civil rights pioneer, for asking God to help mankind work for a day when "white would embrace what is right."

Lowery, known for co-founding the Southern Christian Leadership Conference with Martin Luther King Jr., opened with a quote from the "Black National Anthem." He then asked God to encourage America to make "choices on the side of love, not hate, on the side of inclusion not exclusion, tolerance not intolerance" after President Barack Obama took the presidential oath.

Then he ended his prayer with, "Lord, in the memory of all the saints who from their labors rest, and in the joy of a new beginning, we ask you to help us work for that day when black will not be asked to get back, when brown can stick around – when yellow will be mellow – when the red man can get ahead, man – and when white will embrace what is right."

Obama reacted to the benediction with a smile.

The crowd cheered and boomed with a loud "Amen."
Continue reading

Classless Obama Crowd

I couldn't watch any of the coronation. For me this was a very lousy, depressing day. I cannot believe the groupthink that goes on. What exactly has this guy ever done to inspire this kind of worshipful treatment? What has he actually achieved for so many to make declarations of his greatness and compare him to Kennedy and Lincoln? It's absolutely nauseating. He's a skilled and ruthless politician, nurtured by the criminal Chicago machine who's good at getting himself into office but hasn't actually done anything in either of the two previous positions of US and Ill. state senator. I'm so glad I am capable of thinking for myself.

And the left has also shown just what classless scum it is by the way they treated Bush right down to the final moment. It was despicable. They chanted "Nah nah nah nah, hey hey, good-bye," as he took the stage. But this is the kind of behavior we have come to expect from Obama sycophants. We were witness to it throughout the election season. I intend to give Obama the same respect they have given Bush. This is the thanks he gets for keeping this country safe since 9/11. People do not yet realize or appreciate just what Bush has accomplished. I do believe history will look upon Bush far better than he is seen today. I wonder how Obama will fight terrorism? Perhaps he will use his oratory skills to talk the jihadis out of mass murdering.

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

Look Who's Attending the Coronation

I heard that jeremiah wright and louis farrakhan were going to be present at Obama's corronation. So for anyone who thought Obama befriended these kind of people simply to move up through Chicago politics and that he was going to throw them under the bush once he got in the White House, I think you can disabuse yourselves of that notion. Having those two in attendance along with ISNA president Ingrid Mattson sends a clear in-your-face "fuck you" message to the real America that the black nationalist, islamist, communist front has taken over your country and you can't do a damn thing about it. It will be dark times ahead for America and Israel. I would not expect anything other than Israel being treated with hostility.

Europe May Not Be Completely Hopeless


Despite so much anti-Israel and anti-Semitic sentiment throughout Europe, there are pockets of sanity and morality. I don't know if there is enough of such people to save Europe however. In Italy last week there was a pro-Israel demonstration featuring members of the Italian parliament from across the political spectrum.

And here was a pro-Israel demonstration which took place in Finland with 2500 participants.

Monday, January 19, 2009

Israelis Deserve Better Leaders

Israeli officials have said they will withdraw all IDF forces from Gaza as a gesture to Obama. The war might take the focus off his coronation or because they don't want poor obama to have to deal with an international crisis as soon as he comes in to office. Too fucking bad. If he can't handle these situations he has no business being president. Someone needs to tell these assholes who currently run the Israeli government that their job is to protect Israel, not please foreign heads of state and make life easier for them. As superb as the IDF has performed on the battlefield, ultimately Israel's political leaders screw it all up and turn what should have been a sure victory into a defeat because they did not allow the IDF to finish the job, placing a priority on geopolitics instead. I have really come to feel contempt for the current Kadima government. Israel needs true Zionist leaders. The current crop is not worthy of leading a great nation and its committed, dedicated and patriotic soldiers as well as the rest of its citizens.

Barring any unforeseen developments, Israeli forces are expected to complete their withdrawal from Gaza prior to the inauguration of US President-elect Barack Obama on January 20 (7 pm GMT).

Israel's plan to withdraw prior to the inauguration as a gesture to the incoming US president was mentioned during Sunday's talks between visiting European leaders and Ehud Olmert at the prime minister's official Jerusalem residence.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy, UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown, Spanish Premier Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi and Czech PM, Mirek Topolánek, all traveled to the Middle East over the weekend to assist in the Gaza ceasefire efforts.

Senior officials who attended a dinner party with the world leaders at the PM's residence, including Defense Minister Ehud Barak, Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni and Likud Chairman Benjamin Netanyahu, said Israel is looking to complete its withdrawal as soon as possible.

IDF Officers to Be Persecuted By the UN

As yet another indication of how sick, twisted and morally perverse the world is, Israeli soldiers are going to be prosecuted by the UN for "war crimes" and yet the real perpetrators of war crimes, those who purposely slaughter civilians, hamas, will be let off the hook. And while the UN is accusing Israel of violating its Convention on the Rights of the Child, it has long remained silent while hamas uses children as human shields and brainwhashes and trains them to be terrorists as we saw in those videos. Human rights organizations and the UN are a farce.

The Israeli government is preparing defenses for a “wave of international lawsuits” expected over its offensive in Gaza.

The government believes Israeli army officers and soldiers will be sued over actions in the 21-day old offensive which began on December 27.

A number of human rights organizations, and the International Red Cross, have already indicated they are looking at breaches of international law. The whole question of the legality of the Gaza War is also being examined.

Amnesty International has written to the United Nations Security Council calling for the establishment of full accountability for crimes committed in the Gaza conflict and for deployment of human rights monitors.

In the letter, Amnesty says it wants the Security Council to “take firm action to ensure full accountability for war crimes and other serious abuses of international human rights and humanitarian law.”

Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak has ordered the Israeli army to establish a task force comprising operational, intelligence, and legal experts, to assemble information, documentation, and footage of military operations during the offensive, which will assist in the defence of officers against legal actions expected to be filed by a number of international bodies.

The task forced named “Incrimination Team” is presently examining all footage taken by the Israeli army of the Gaza operation since it began.

Israeli Attorney General Menahem Mazuz warned the government earlier this week a “wave of international lawsuits” was expected.

"We need to be prepared for the potential lawsuits that will be filed against senior officers," a defense official told The Jerusalem Post. "The team will review the footage and intelligence information and formulate arguments that can be used to defend against claims that Israel committed war crimes in Gaza." The footage collected by the team was filmed by regular combat soldiers who received special training on how to film and document military operations under combat conditions.
Continue reading

Good Riddance to Europe

Europe responds to the threat of islam by increasing its hatred and hostility towards Israel and Jews.

I am standing in a queue waiting to buy a train ticket from London to Canterbury. A well-dressed lady standing behind me informs her friend that she “can’t wait till Israel disappears off the face of the earth.” What struck me was not her intense hostility to Israel but the mild-mannered, matter-of-fact tone with which she announced her wish for the annihilation of a nation. It seems that it is okay to condemn and demonize Israel. All of a sudden Israel has become an all-purpose target for a variety of disparate and confused causes. When I ask a group of Pakistani waiters sitting around a table in their restaurant why they “hate” Israel, they casually tell me that it is because Jews are their “religion’s enemy.” Those who are highly educated have their own pet prejudice. One of my young colleagues who teaches media studies in a London-based university was taken aback during a seminar discussion when some of her students insisted that since all the banks are owned by Jews, Israel was responsible for the current global financial crisis.

I can’t wait till Britain is completely swallowed up and destroyed by the muslims they have embraced. They deserve nothing less for choosing to side with evil. And the same goes for the rest of Europe. Despite their countries being invaded and destroyed by muslims, it is Israel they want disappeared instead of the islamic countries. This is nothing less than moral cowardice and depravity.

Increasingly expressions of aversion towards Israel have assumed the status of a taken-for-granted sentiment in many sections of polite European society. Such attitudes are underwritten by powerful cultural forces that communicate the idea that Israel is a malevolent society sui generis. It alone faces regular demands for academic and commercial boycotts. In the media and popular culture it is often portrayed as an intensely racist and barbaric society. Once upon a time its opponents depicted Israel as a guard dog of the West; these days they are more likely to castigate it as the biggest threat to world peace and stability. For a variety of reasons, Israel has come to bear the cross of all of the West’s sins. In Europe in particular, there is a powerful sense of weariness towards Israel. “If only it would go away, then we would have a chance for peace in the Middle East” is the fantasy view of some European officials and writers. Europe’s population agrees. Islamic terrorism is often portrayed as the inevitable consequence of Israel’s policies.

In reality, many Western European officials are worried not just about peace in the Middle East, but also about managing the radicalization of their own Muslim population. Distancing Europe from Israel is seen as necessary for appeasing the anger of Europe’s Muslim population. From this perspective, the problem is not simply Israel but also Europe’s Jewish population. So in order to accommodate what are taken to be Muslim sensibilities, Jewish interests often become a negotiable commodity. For example, in England some teachers are reluctant to discuss the experience of the Holocaust in the classroom in case it alienates children from a Muslim background. An illustration of a similar dynamic at work is shown by the example of Denmark.
Continue reading

Israel's Leaders Refuse Victory

Another major letdown from Israel's political leadership choosing to stop short of total victory and allowing hamas, just as they did hezbollah, to remain intact and able regroup, rearm and to wage war again sometime in the near future.

This is a shit and meaningless agreement. Why do Israel’s political leaders continue to fail to grasp the fact that only the IDF can and will protect Israel, not foreign countries and international organizations? And to add insult to injury, Gilad Shalit is not included as a condition for a ceasefire.

Diplomatic officials said that the effort to stop the smuggling has three parts: an international effort to choke off the smuggling routes before the arms find their way to the tunnels under the Philadelphi Corridor; more effective Egyptian efforts in fighting the smuggling at the border; the building of some type of physical barrier - a moat, trench or some kind of underground "wall" - that could be built by US or European engineers and technicians.

Europe also committed itself over the weekend to fighting the smuggling, with French President Nicolas Sarkozy, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi and Spanish Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero, scheduled to arrive in Israel Sunday to give their support to the agreement.

They will be coming to Israel from Sharm e-Sheikh, where Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak and Sarkozy are cochairing a summit to discuss the crisis.

Among other participants invited to attend are UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, Turkish Prime Minister Recap Tayyip Erdogan - who on Friday called for Israel to be barred from the UN - and Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas.

Brown announced Saturday that Britain was prepared to provide naval resources to help monitor and stop arms being smuggled into the Gaza Strip.

Brown said Germany, France and Britain sent a letter to Israel and Egypt saying that they were prepared to do everything they could to prevent arms trafficking. Italy also signed on the letter.

In addition, Brown said Britain was also prepared to do everything it can to help with the border crossings, including European support for monitors at the crossings.

"We are prepared to provide British naval support to stop arms trafficking. Other countries are agreeing also that they will provide the support that is necessary to stop arms getting into Gaza," Brown said. "At the same time, we're prepared to provide European support for monitoring at the crossings."

The Moral Bankruptcy of Juan Cole

Juan Cole, the guy who defended Iran's dictator by claiming he really didn't threaten to wipe Israel off the map, but rather his words were mistranslated, warns Israel not to spoil Obama's coronation by continuing to defend herself.

There are rumors that the Israeli government may declare a unilateral cease fire Saturday. They had better. Because if they ruin the Obama inauguration by splashing the bloody bodies of dead Palestinian children all over the press during the next few days, no Americans, even the most pro-Israeli, are going to forgive them. The war has left 1,140 Palestinians dead, over 300 children, and over 5,000 wounded including many women and children, as well as 13 Israelis (4 of them civilians killed by rocket fire). We pay for these wars, we provide the fighter jets, bombs, and tanks. And we don't want our money used for this sanguinary purpose in the first place; we have enough to be guilty about all on our own. And we especially don't want to hear a peep from over there while we swear in our first African-American president.

So as far as this punk cole is concerned, Israel should prioritize obama's party ahead of the protection of its own citizens. Drop dead juan cole! Americans strongly support Israel and her right to defend herself, regardless of vile propagandists like cole. Despite the media hype surrounding Obama's corronation, and the importance on it placed by leftists, most Americans just view this as another presidential inauguration, not anything special and would not be angered at Israel for "ruining" it by defending herself.

In a previous post, cole compared the situation of Gazans to slavery:
I would argue that Israel is keeping the Gazans in a state akin to slavery. Here are some similarities between the condition of the people of Gaza and classical slavery:

# They were deprived of their basic rights as a result of a military conquest. (Peoples and individuals have often been enslaved as a result of being vanquished.)

# They are stateless. In fact, US slaves at the time the constitution was written in the eighteenth century were at least counted as 3/5s of a citizen. Gazans are not counted as citizens at all by any existing state.

# They have suffered what Orlando Patterson called "social death." Most Gazans are refugees from the 1948 and 1967 wars and used to live in what is now Israel, but had their property stolen by the European Jewish settlers. They are now trapped in Gaza, and are cut off from many other members of their clan. Social death occurs when the enslaved is removed from his or her original social and geographical context. The Gazans are certainly for the most part cut off in this way.

# Gazans lack mobility, being trapped in the Gaza Strip. Israel controls their borders and their air and coastline. There is also a checkpoint on the short border with Egypt, but it is strictly policed. It is typical of the condition of slaves that they are deprived fo the liberty of movement.

# They do not control their own property. Thus, Gazans cannot own a medical clinic [or a Qassam launcher--YG], e.g., and be sure of it not being bombed by the Israelis. They can never know from day to day what the Israelis will do to their property. They cannot export their goods via their harbor on the Mediterranean because Israel does not allow it. They cannot have a functioning airport. Likewise slaves do not actually own property, since the slavemaster actually owns it and can dispose of it as he likes.

# Innocent Gazans may be killed or maimed with impunity by Israeli bombs and shells. Likewise, slavemasters in most societies can kill or beat their slaves with few repercussions.

# Gazans can be deprived of enough nutrition to be healthy at will. A free person lacking nutrition can make arrangements to get more. A slave, because of lack of freedom of movement, is forced to simply go hungry.

It may be objected that Israelis do not make Gazans work for them for free. But forced labor is only one element of slavery. The essential characteristics of any slave system have more to do with the denial of liberty than with the precise economic form of exploitation practiced on the slave. That there has been Israeli economic exploitation of Gazans and their resources is in any case undeniable.

Unless and until the Gazans are freed by the Israeli Pharoah from their debilitating bondage, the violence will go on. And the Gazans, having been deprived of their liberty as Samson was deprived of his sight, are perfectly capable of bringing down the whole structure of Levantine security if this unhealthy and outrageous denial to them of the elements of basic human dignity does not cease once and for all.

The reason the so-called "palestinians" are not counted as citizens of any state is because the Arabs have refused to absorb them into their own countries and give them citizenship. It is the Arabs who should be held responsible for their own, not Israel. It is the Arabs who are solely to blame for their situation since they have deliberately kept them as perpetual refugees in order to be used as political pawns.

And the reason there are checkpoints, fences and a lack of freedom of movement for Gaza's Arabs is because they present a threat to the lives of Israeli citizens when given such freedom. Juan Cole and like-minded creeps refuse to hold the palestinian population accountable for its own plight. They refuse to acknowledge that their predicament has been self-inflicted. Gaza was handed over to these people and they had the chance to build a viable economic and political entity and instead they looted and burned down the greenhouses left to them, voted in hamas which built up an arsenal of rockets and other weaponry and chose to war against Israel. Its a very simple equation, stop being a threat to the lives of Israelis and you can have freedom of movement and thus economic prosperity. Yet this is something that a supposed intellectual like juan cole simply cannot wrap his brain around. There were no fences and checkpoints pre-Oslo when Israel had full control over the territories and there was little terrorism.

Sunday, January 18, 2009

Haveil Havalim

Edition #201 of the Jewish blog carnival Haveil Havalim is up at Rebbetzin's Husband.

Unilateral Ceasefire

I'm frustrated and furious about Israel's decision for a unilateral ceasefire just when it has hamas on the ropes. I think they wanted to end it before Obama gets in and also are wilting under world pressure. But why is Israel's political leadership more concerned about the screeching of the world's riffraff and rabble then they are of protecting their own citizens? Why give your enemies the satisfaction of dealing hamas anything less than a crushing defeat? Even more sickening than the howling, enraged protests of islamists, marxists and neo-nazis the world over, is the idea of them gloating over Israel's defeat. Whenever they are angry, it means Israel and America are doing something RIGHT. I really thought Israel learned its lesson from Lebanon.

Moyers' Attack on Israel and Jews

PBS's Bill Moyers in a disgusting diatribe against Israel, referred to the Jewish state as being "genetically coded" to commit violence and morally equivocating Israeli self-defense with hamas terrorism.

Moyers and most of the rest of the commentators, journalists and reporters from the big media outlets are moral degenerates. The mass media has been absolutely abominable in its coverage of Gaza, as it was in Lebanon and Jenin, where we had false reports of a "massacre" which was later uncovered as a hoax. This is also what they have done with regard to our wars in Afghanistan and Iraq in which American soldiers were falsely accused of atrocities. It is this kind of coverage which turned Americans against the war in Iraq and almost undermined it. And as bad as our media is, its so much worse in Europe. You can just imagine what they are hearing and part of the reason why Europe is so anti-Israel and not just the muslim immigrants but the native populations.

I'll take Joe the plumber over each and every one of them. If a community activist can become president of the United States and a comedian can be a senator, then a plumber can become a war correspondent. And at least Joe has moral clarity and understands who is good and who is evil in this conflict, unlike those miscreants in the msm.

Bill Moyers Journal (excerpts)

Jan 9, 2009

BILL MOYERS: For too much of the world at large the names of the dead and wounded in Gaza might as well be John Doe too. They are the casualties and victims of Israel's decision to silence the rockets from Hamas terrorists by waging war on an entire population. Yes, every nation has the right to defend its people. Israel is no exception, all the more so because Hamas would like to see every Jew in Israel dead.

But brute force can turn self defense into state terrorism. It's what the U.S. did in Vietnam, with B 52s and napalm, and again in Iraq, with shock and awe. By killing indiscriminately the elderly, kids, entire families by destroying schools and hospitals Israel did exactly what terrorists do and exactly what Hamas wanted. It spilled the blood that turns the wheel of retribution.

Hardly had Israeli tank fire killed and injured scores at a UN school in Gaza than a senior Hamas leader went on television to announce, "The Zionists have legitimized the killing of their children by killing our children." Already attacks on Jews in Europe are escalating a burning car crashes into a synagogue in Southern France, a fiery object is hurled through a window in Sweden, venomous anti Semitic graffiti appears across the continent, and arsonists strike in London.

What we are seeing in Gaza is the latest battle in the oldest family quarrel on record. Open your Bible: the sons of the patriarch Abraham become Arab and Jew. Go to the Book of Deuteronomy. When the ancient Israelites entered Canaan their leaders urged violence against its inhabitants. The very Moses who had brought down the commandment "Thou shalt not kill" now proclaimed, "You must destroy completely all the places where the nations have served their gods. You must tear down their altars, smash their pillars, cut down their sacred poles, set fire to the carved images of their gods, and wipe out their name from that place."

So God soaked violence became genetically coded. A radical stream of Islam now seeks to eliminate Israel from the face of the earth. Israel misses no opportunity to humiliate the Palestinians with checkpoints, concrete walls, routine insults, and the onslaught in Gaza. As if boasting of their might, Israel defense forces even put up video of the explosions on YouTube for all the world to see. A Norwegian doctor there tells CBS, "It's like Dante's Inferno. They are bombing one and a half million people in a cage."

America has officially chosen sides. We supply Israel with money, F 16s, winks and tacit signals. Our Christian right links arms with the religious extremists there who claim divine sanctions for Israel's occupation of the West Bank. Our political elites show neither independence nor courage by challenging the consensus that Israel can do no wrong. Although one recent poll found Democratic voters overwhelmingly oppose the Israeli offensive by a 24 point margin, Democratic Party leaders in Congress nonetheless march in lockstep to the hardliners in Israel and the White House. Rarely does our mainstream media depart from the monotonous monologue of the party line. Many American Jews know, as Aaron David Miller writes in the current "Newsweek", that the destruction in Gaza won't do much to address Israel's longer term needs.

But those who raise questions are accused by a prominent reform rabbi of being "morally deficient." One Jewish American activist told me this week that never in 30 years has he seen such blind and binding conformity in his community. "You'd never know," he said, "that it is the Gazans who are doing most of the suffering."

We are in a terrible bind Israel, the Palestinians, the United States. Each greases the cycle of violence, as one man's terrorism becomes another's resistance to oppression. Is it possible to turn this mindless tragedy toward peace? For starters, read Aaron David Miller's article in the current "Newsweek". Get his book, "The Much Too Promised Land". And pay no attention to those Washington pundits cheering the fighting in Gaza as they did the bloodletting in Iraq. Killing is cheap and war is a sport in a city where life and death become abstractions of policy. Here are the people who pay the price.

That's it for the Journal. I'm Bill Moyers. We'll be back next wee

Saturday, January 17, 2009

Self-Hating Jewish British MP

Here is a traitorous self-hating "Jewish" member of the British parliament accusing Israel of acting like nazis in Gaza. Ultimately kapos such as this bastard are even more contemptible than the hordes of sub-human islamist, marxist and neo-nazi filth around the world screaming for the blood of Israelis and Jews. They are no doubt pleased by this statement as you can read from the hundreds of vile anti-Semitic comments posted. They just love these self-hating Jews of the Chomsky and Finkelstein ilk. Please go over and flood this Youtube video with comments to counter the sick haters.

Surprise For a Hamas Terrorist

Here's a cool video of what happened to a hamas terrorist as he was firing mortars at Israel.

UNRWA Employed Hamas and Islamic Jihad Terrorists

Here is yet one more reason that the UN should be considered a terrorist entity as well as guilty of war crimes. The UNRWA school which the IDF struck, employed hamas and islamic jihad members and provides textbooks which incite hate.

The United Nations agency that administers a school in Gaza where dozens of civilians were killed by Israeli mortar fire last week has admitted to employing terrorists to work at its Palestinian schools in the past, has no system in place to keep members of Hamas or Islamic Jihad off its payroll, and provides textbooks to children that contain hate speech and other incendiary information.

A growing chorus of critics has taken aim at the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) in recent years, although momentum on Capitol Hill has been slow. But last week's incident, which Israel maintains was prompted by Hamas operatives firing mortars at Israelis from a location near the school, has prompted some lawmakers to scrutinize the U.N. agency.

Rep. Steve Rothman, D-N.J., introduced a resolution in the fall calling for greater transparency and accountability at UNRWA. The bill called on the agency to make its textbooks available on the Internet for public inspection and to implement "terrorist name recognition software and other screening procedures that would help to ensure that UNRWA staff, volunteers, and beneficiaries are neither terrorists themselves, nor affiliated with known terrorist organizations."

Rothman said he plans to re-introduce his UNRWA resolution in the coming weeks because, "as timely as this bill was before, it is even more timely now. It is urgent that Congress can be assured that U.S. taxpayer money is not being spent to support Hamas and its murderous activities."
Continue reading