The left has historically enabled mass murder and genocide under the guise of "peace". In the name of peace in our time, they enabled WW2 and the holocaust. The "peace" movement drove America out of Vietnam and thus enabled the killing fields of Cambodia. The left also supported mass murderers Stalin and Mao.
Why is Ahmadinejad Smiling?Continue reading
Sprightly Ahmadinejad tours nuclear facilities, having stolen an election he marches on as his police batter and protesters. And everywhere he goes, he smiles his trademark loopy smile. The smile of a psychopath or a saint.
Why is Ahmadinejad smiling? The answer is not a terribly complicated one. With every step he takes and every day that he remains in power, he discredits the most deeply held ideas of Western liberals about the power of diplomacy to resolve conflicts and internal civil disobedience to achieve peaceful regime change. Despite years of diplomatic and hundreds of thousands of protesters taking to the streets-- Ahmadinejad's grip on power remains as secure as ever.
Walking over the bodies of student protesters, of political dissidents, of the thousands killed by the wars he has touched off, he continues to taunt the rest of the world to do anything about it. And the rest of the world has done nothing except talk. And as Ahmadinejad has demonstrated, talk counts for nothing at all.
While Mahmoud Ahmadinejad may be detached from ordinary reality, living in an Islamic version of Charles Manson's fantasies about touching off a spectacular war in order to bring on a new age, he understands his enemies well enough to call them out on their weakness. Like every other Islamic terrorist and warlord, Ahmadinejad sees diplomacy as weakness behind a mask of civility. And like just about every strongman in the world, he laughs at it.
Ahmadinejad may be a monster, but there are no shortage of monsters in the Middle East. Saddam Hussein was just as bad, yet much of the American and European left proved eager to shut their eyes to the rape rooms, to Uday's horrors of mangled limbs and broken fingers, to the ethnic cleansing and gassing-- while demanding that we respect Saddam's sovereignty. Today those very same people pat themselves on the back, as if defending the right of a tyrant to keep killing his own people were some great act of moral courage.
But even Saddam and Ahmadinejad are not particularly unique, because monsters proliferate in the Middle East like mushrooms after a rainstorm, growing off the oil money that their enemies send them, which they exchange for weapons and payments to their own loyalists to secure their base of power. Every petrodollar sent to the Middle East means death of a certain kind, whether it's the death of a passerby by a suicide bomb in Basra funded by Iranian or Saudi money, the death of an imported Indian contract worker in Dubai or the murder of an African Sudanese in Sudan. Either way oil money is death money, and the world knows it, and yet does nothing. No wonder Ahmadinejad keeps on smiling.
4 comments:
Palestinians must stop “incitement to hate”—while only recently, Israeli soldiers proudly sported t-shirts depicting a pregnant Arab woman framed in crosshairs under the caption: “one shot—two kills.” Arabs want to “push Jews into the sea”—while Israel herds Palestinians into the open-air prison of Gaza. Hamas must stop “rocket attacks”—with no mention that Gaza is home to many Palestinians expelled by Zionists in 1948 from the Arab village of Najd, literally erased from the map by Israel only to reappear in 1951 as the Jewish town of Sderot.
Jews were expelled by Jordan in 1948 from eastern Jerusalem and Judea and Samaria.
The only ones imprisoning Gazans at gunpoint are hamas: http://abcnews.go.com/International/WireStory?id=3292917&page=4
"In related news, Hamas have deployed gunmen along the 8-mile border road separating Egypt from Gaza, and at the Rafah border crossing, to keep people from fleeing into Egypt. Palestinians who tried to leave Gaza via Rafah were turned back at gunpoint."
BTW that t-shirt story was another pallywood fabrication.
The policy should ALWAYS be: if any nation even looks like being able to say no to us, or resist our will in ANY way, then we should pre-emptively git 'em while they are weaker than us. We've missed China. Now it looks like Iran. We can only keep our lifestyles this good by force, the world isn't going to blithely let us use 25-30% of the earth's resources for just 4% of its population unless we do it by force, just like our parents and grandparents did. And Don Corleone. It makes my blood boil to think that Iran could sit tight on all that oil and refuse to give it us for peanuts, which - believe me! - they will if they get nukes. They'll be able to sell it to whomever, and protect their territory and shipping lanes and DEFY us.... WTF is going on, man!!!! We need those bunker busters NOW before its too late.
The policy should ALWAYS be: if any nation even looks like being able to say no to us, or resist our will in ANY way, then we should pre-emptively git 'em while they are weaker than us. We've missed China. Now it looks like Iran. We can only keep our lifestyles this good by force, the world isn't going to blithely let us use 25-30% of the earth's resources for just 4% of its population unless we do it by force, just like our parents and grandparents did. And Don Corleone. It makes my blood boil to think that Iran could sit tight on all that oil and refuse to give it us for peanuts, which - believe me! - they will if they get nukes. They'll be able to sell it to whomever, and protect their territory and shipping lanes and DEFY us.... WTF is going on, man!!!! We need those bunker busters NOW before its too late.
Post a Comment