New York Times’ Anti-American Heart Beats Fast for ‘Jihadis: A Love Story’Continued
Posted by Pamela Geller Apr 5th 2010 at 9:04 am in Featured Story, New York Times, media bias | Comments (102)
Yesterday’s New York Times simultaneously vilified Americans and romanticized female Muslim jihad homicide bombers. The killer, Dzhanet Abdullayeva, was the subject of a sympathetic lede story on the front page, with this headline: “Lured into Russian Jihad, 17-Year-Old Avenges Slain Husband.” (Maybe their sympathy for this murderer embarrassed them, since online the same story was given a straighter headline: “Russia Says Suicide Bomber Was Militant’s Widow.”)
Lured? In the photo, the girl is wearing a hijab, brandishing a gun and looking straight into the camera. Her husband was a bloodthirsty murdering jihadi. Do they discuss the religious motivation that led this girl to commit mass murder? No. Do they educate Americans on the Islamic texts that demand, command, and prescribe jihad? No. They make it, “Jihad, a Love Story.”
Tuesday, April 6, 2010
The NY Times' Treachery
The NY Times is a filthy rag sheet that deserves to go out of business. This was the same newspaper which failed to report on the holocaust and on the rare occasions that it did, relegated the story to the back pages. This is the same newspaper which denied the Ukrainian famine and supported stalin. It has a shameful history of enabling evil and it continues to this day. In its Sunday edition, the Times featured a story romanticizing the islamic women who blew up the Russian subways.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comments:
Does anybody Know What Benjamin Netanyahu wants? Has anybody ever wanted Predecessor Loved Understood What? Where Are They headed? And Where Are They Leading us? One after Another, Israeli Politicians Have Been Asked Questions thesis, only to reply with the standard rejoinders: "You do not expect me to answer this question" or "Let's leave this for the negotiations." Vague answers, obfuscations, evasive and noncommittal cliches - promises, promises. There Was one clear, unequivocal answer - none. There Is No Other Country Whose Citizens, Friends and Enemies have-nots about the Slightest Clue Which It Is direction facing. For o Enemies not to know IS Understandable, we do not aim Deserve to know more? Do not we at least Deserve to Know the ultimate goal?
While the Arabs Always Have Declared Their aspirations - and with clarity so DID, precision, and sharpness at times extremism, the Israelis Have donned masks. While the goals of Warring Parties in International Conflicts are Known to all, and while everyone knows What the Palestinians are after in the Middle East - the '67 lines, a state, a solution to the Refugee problem, the right of return - nobody knows What the Israelis want. Do They wish to annex the territories? Come on. Do They Want Them to evacuate? Not now. If not now, when? It Remains Unclear. How Much of the territories? Nobody knows.
A FEW days ago, journalists broached the issue of a construction freeze in Jerusalem to a few "Ministers. Almost all of 'em Refused to "give a reply. Why Should They? This is nothing less Than a Scandal. A minister who's not ready to state one year after heading Loved IS derelict in His droits. When a prime minister refrains from doing so, it is 10 times as severe. While Swedish law obligate the publication of Every letter from the Office of feels a minister, we can not extract a response from Even o Top Officials over critical issues.
Advertisement
The blame, as usual in forums thesis, shared by us all IS. Through the years We Have Agreed That implicitly o leaders would guide us on the Basis of fraud, or at the very least distortion. The mantra of there's-no-need-to-say-it-aloud Has Become a matter of consensus, Almost a year axiom.
The Conventional thinking whereby Striving for Peace is likened-to-market bartering and late-night horse-trading, 'as if it Were verboten clearly "To specify a final price, Has Become official policy. What Might Work for the illusory world of advertising and marketing, or the greed of the consumer culture, Has Become a Philosophical Cornerstone in this country. Vagueness Is The Message. Perhaps this country has no goal, gold has a way to get to goal, and the Vagueness IS Meant to obfuscate this disgrace.
Is the prime minister of Israel Ready to Withdraw from the Golan Heights in exchange for peace with Syria? Yes or No? Do we Deserve to Know? Which share of the West Bank, if "any, is he ready to evacuate? And what, for heaven's sake, Docs o defense minister want? What are Loved policy goals? Does anybody know? And Why Is It That if We Were to know the answer, this would not Weaken o Strengthen and position it? Vagueness Is Tantamount to strength? Is trickery has modus operandi?
Our amateur merchants, as is wont Their Will Never Reveal Their opinions. No wonder Their wholesale marketing strategy Has Proved to Be a resounding failure. Israel's overall standing iz at all-time low this year due to, Among Other Things, Ambiguity and a loss of direction. Even the all-knowing President Of The United States has no idea What Loved ally wants. Now at least HE IS Trying to get an answer by Saying, "Tell Me What it is you people want." It Is doubtful that Israel knows for sure. It seems like the blind leading the blind.
Post a Comment