Sharia in New Jersey

A judge in New Jersey decided that a muslim man who raped his wife shouldn't be punished because islamic law permits a husband to rape his wife if she refuses sex. Can you believe that sharia law is being accepted in 21st century America? I wonder if any feminists raised their voices in protest. We should be able to expect the law to protect abused women but instead a politically correct dhimmi judge essentially gives muslim men a license to rape. Fortunately the decision was overturned by an appellate court.

Sharia in New Jersey: Muslim husband rapes wife, judge sees no sexual assault because Islam forbids wives to refuse sex
Muhammad said: "If a husband calls his wife to his bed [i.e. to have sexual relation] and she refuses and causes him to sleep in anger, the angels will curse her till morning" (Bukhari 4.54.460).

He also said: "By him in Whose Hand lies my life, a woman can not carry out the right of her Lord, till she carries out the right of her husband. And if he asks her to surrender herself [to him for sexual intercourse] she should not refuse him even if she is on a camel's saddle" (Ibn Majah 1854).

And now a New Jersey judge sees no evidence that a Muslim committed sexual assault of his wife -- not because he didn't do it, but because he was acting on his Islamic beliefs: "This court does not feel that, under the circumstances, that this defendant had a criminal desire to or intent to sexually assault or to sexually contact the plaintiff when he did. The court believes that he was operating under his belief that it is, as the husband, his desire to have sex when and whether he wanted to, was something that was consistent with his practices and it was something that was not prohibited."

More from Atlas Shrugs