Hillary’s Malice Toward Israel

Mrs. Clinton needs to be informed that the religious interests of people of all faiths around the world already ARE respected in a united Jerusalem under full Israeli sovereignty. However under a muslim “palestinian” state, Jewish and Christian people’s faith will NOT be respected just as they weren’t respected under Jordanian occupation. Hillary is neither ignorant or naive. Certainly she is aware that this is not a dispute over territory, but rather a religious imperative on the part of muslims to obliterate the Jewish state. She surely knows that Israeli land concessions and the creation of a “palestinian” islamic terror state will not bring about peace. So what else can we conclude from her and her boss’ continued insistence on Israel surrendering land be about except malice towards Israel?

Clinton a danger to Israel

Op-ed: Hillary Clinton’s disregard for Arab desire to eliminate Israel delusional, evil

Moshe Dann, YNet News

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s address to the Saban Forum should leave little doubt that she is a danger to the State of Israel and, thereby, to the Jewish people. For those who care about Israel, her words, because she expresses the position of President Obama’s administration, are alarming.

Clinton’s speech was praised for not demanding a further settlement freeze; this was because US policy makers realized it would accomplish nothing, and PM Netanyahu had already agreed to stop, or severely limit building de facto. Instead, she emphasized state-building, “ending the occupation,” and borders. Coupled with international recognition of Palestinian statehood, this side-steps Israeli resistance to a freeze and insistence on Palestinian acceptance of Israel, further isolating Israel. What she did not say is worse.

Not once did she mention official PA support, directly and indirectly, for incitement and terrorism. While passing on the usual gesture to America’s “commitment to Israel’s security,” her focus was elsewhere.

Blindly obedient to the notion of building a Palestinian state, she ignored the recent statement of Fatah, the PA’s ruling party in the West Bank: “No to Israel as a Jewish state, no to interim borders, no to land swaps.” And that’s only for openers.

continue