NIF leader: disappearance of Jewish state no tragedy Fresno Zionismcontinue
This is stunning.
Actually, it’s completely expected, not surprising at all. It’s like your spouse admitting to having an affair. You knew it all along but hearing from her own lips is … stunning.
Last year, the US Embassy in Tel Aviv interviewed a number of people in connection with a law being considered by the Knesset to require transparency in non-governmental organization (NGO) funding.
It had become common knowledge that huge amounts of money from such sources as European governments and the New Israel Fund (NIF) in the US were flowing to ‘Israeli’ NGOs — primarily left-wing organizations — which were acting against the interests of the State of Israel. A particularly egregious example was the way a group of these NGOs provided almost all of the anti-IDF material in the UN’s vicious blood libel, the Goldstone Report.
Ambassador James B. Cunningham reported on the interviews in a cable sent to the State Department on February 25, 2010, now made public by Wikileaks. The cable includes an explanation by Dr. Gerald Steinberg of NGO Monitor (a source I’ve quoted often) of why the legislation, based on the US Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) is needed.
You should read that, but let’s cut to the chase. Ambassador Cunningham’s cable included this:
New Israel Fund (NIF) [former] Associate Director in Israel Hedva Radovanitz, who manages grants to 350 NGOs totaling about 18 million dollars per year, told PolOff [political officer] on February 23 that the campaign against the NGOs was due to the “disappearance of the political left wing” in Israel and the lack of domestic constituency for the NGOs. She noted that when she headed ACRI’s [Association for Civil Rights in Israel] Tel Aviv office, ACRI had 5,000 members, while today it has less than 800, and it was only able to muster about 5,000 people to its December human rights march by relying on the active staff of the 120 NGOs that participated. Radovanitz commented that the NIF was working behind the scenes through many NGOs to prevent the NGO legislation from passing in its current form. She commented that she believed that in 100 years Israel would be majority Arab and that the disappearance of a Jewish state would not be the tragedy that Israelis fear since it would become more democratic.
Monday, September 5, 2011
No More Money for the Subversive NIF
If you needed more proof that leftism is a mental disorder, here it is. New Israel Fund leader, Hedva Radovanitz, sees no tragedy in the dissolution of Israel as a Jewish state. You see, she believes that an Israel overrun with millions of genocidal Jew-haters would make Israel more "democratic". Just like all of those other democratic Arab-islamic states that Israel is surrounded by. Since Hedva and her fellow travelers reject the idea of a Jewish state, why don't they simply leave Israel and live in one of those other countries which already have an Arab-islamic majority where they will no doubt feel more at home in?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
"If you needed more proof that leftism is a mental disorder..."
I didn't, but thanks for providing a good one.
Of course, good old Hedva doesn't really want to live in a majority Arab country or she would just move to one. I would suggest Gaza, and I would further suggest that she move there today. I will let Hamas that know she's coming.
Radovanitz isn't really mentally disordered, at least not in the clinical sense of the term. She hates Jews, and wants them dead. Irrational to be sure, given that she is ostensibly Jewish. But not crazy according to the psychiatric definition.
She is crazy in the Hitlerian way. Hitler hated Jews so much that he diverted necessary resources from the Russian front and redeployed them to the extermination camps. It was a fatally self-defeating action, much as Hedva behaves in a way that is inimical to her own survival.
But I do not attribute either case to insanity. Hitler was evil, and so is Hedva. Malevolence is much worse than diminished mental capacity, so calling them "crazy" is excessively kind.
Good points.
Post a Comment