Sarkozy warns that US veto on Palestinian state will spark violence Jihadwatch
Yes, and what are the implications of that? We should do what is right, come what may. Sarkozy is suggesting that we should give in to violent intimidation, and that terrorism and Islamic supremacist thuggery should be rewarded.
"Sarkozy Says USA Veto On Palestine Will Spark Violence," from AGI, September 21 (thanks to C. Cantoni):
(AGI) New York - Speaking at the U.N. General Assembly in New York, French President Nicolas Sarkozy rejected Barack Obama's position stating that a USA veto to the Palestinian PNA's request for U.N. nationhood will spark "a new wave of violence in the Middle East."
Thursday, September 22, 2011
Sarkozy's Moral Cowardice
Sarkozy warns that a US veto of a fakestinian terror state will spark violence in the Middle East. What doesn't spark islamic violence? Cartoons spark muslim violence, as well as unveiled women, teddy bears named mohamed etc. The Middle East won't be any more violent than it already is. Anyway, I think Sarkozy fears muslim violence in his own country. France opened its borders to millions of jihadis and now its leaders think they can pacify them at Israel's expense. Sarkozy is the same moral coward his predecessors were.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comments:
Earlier in the week, you posted a piece about the amoral rot of the British.
Now, it is time for an exposition of French depravity.
Yet in all fairness, given that France grovels before Muslims on the home front, is it reasonable to expect these paragons of pusillanimous putridity to exhibit honor abroad?
It remains to be seen if the ravages of ethical atrophy doom America, but there is no doubting that Europe is speeding down the highway to hell.
There is an old pet lover's saying that there must be dogs in heaven because any place without dogs is actually hell. I would paraphrase that to read that hell must be teeming with Frenchmen because any place without Frenchmen is actually heaven.
"Fuck the French!"
It's not just a vulgar turn of a phrase.
It's a venerable philosophy of life.
I think it might even be in Leviticus.
Post a Comment